Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
Background/objective: This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height. Methods: Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2025-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000674 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832087729380261888 |
---|---|
author | Christopher J. Cleary Summer B. Cook Ashley A. Herda |
author_facet | Christopher J. Cleary Summer B. Cook Ashley A. Herda |
author_sort | Christopher J. Cleary |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background/objective: This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height. Methods: Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate in four sessions: familiarization, 3-min rest interval with no jumps (CON), and two randomized experimental sessions with a rest interval of either 1-min (ER1) or 5-min (ER5) after a series of tuck jumps. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was assessed at baseline (PRE) and after (POST) the CON, ER1, and ER5 conditions, and 10-s Wingate cycling testing. Wingate relative peak power (RPP) and mean peak power (RMP) were measured. Separate mixed-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance assessed changes across conditions and sex for the Wingate variables and conditions, sex, and time for CMJ height at an alpha of p ≤ 0.05. Results: RPP and RMP were significantly greater than CON for ER1 by 0.92 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.41 ± 0.14 W kg−1, respectively, and ER5 by 0.77 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.36 ± 0.10 W kg−1, respectively. ER1 and ER5 RPP and RMP were similar (p > 0.05). For CMJ height, there was only a main effect for sex as males jumped higher than females by 31.3 % (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Performing tuck jumps prior to anaerobic exercise may increase performance for up to 5-min. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-5f8ca74e7819499090584b41fb81ac0f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1728-869X |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness |
spelling | doaj-art-5f8ca74e7819499090584b41fb81ac0f2025-02-06T05:11:23ZengElsevierJournal of Exercise Science & Fitness1728-869X2025-01-0123116Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performanceChristopher J. Cleary0Summer B. Cook1Ashley A. Herda2Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas Edwards Campus, Overland Park, KS, USADepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USADepartment of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas Edwards Campus, Overland Park, KS, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA; Corresponding author. 12604 Quivira Road, BEST 350X, Overland Park, KS, 66213, USA.Background/objective: This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height. Methods: Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate in four sessions: familiarization, 3-min rest interval with no jumps (CON), and two randomized experimental sessions with a rest interval of either 1-min (ER1) or 5-min (ER5) after a series of tuck jumps. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was assessed at baseline (PRE) and after (POST) the CON, ER1, and ER5 conditions, and 10-s Wingate cycling testing. Wingate relative peak power (RPP) and mean peak power (RMP) were measured. Separate mixed-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance assessed changes across conditions and sex for the Wingate variables and conditions, sex, and time for CMJ height at an alpha of p ≤ 0.05. Results: RPP and RMP were significantly greater than CON for ER1 by 0.92 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.41 ± 0.14 W kg−1, respectively, and ER5 by 0.77 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.36 ± 0.10 W kg−1, respectively. ER1 and ER5 RPP and RMP were similar (p > 0.05). For CMJ height, there was only a main effect for sex as males jumped higher than females by 31.3 % (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Performing tuck jumps prior to anaerobic exercise may increase performance for up to 5-min.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000674WingatePostactivationPlyometricsErgogenic |
spellingShingle | Christopher J. Cleary Summer B. Cook Ashley A. Herda Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness Wingate Postactivation Plyometrics Ergogenic |
title | Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance |
title_full | Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance |
title_short | Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance |
title_sort | evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance |
topic | Wingate Postactivation Plyometrics Ergogenic |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000674 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT christopherjcleary evaluationofrestintervalfollowingaseriesoftuckjumpsonanaerobicperformance AT summerbcook evaluationofrestintervalfollowingaseriesoftuckjumpsonanaerobicperformance AT ashleyaherda evaluationofrestintervalfollowingaseriesoftuckjumpsonanaerobicperformance |