Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance

Background/objective: This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height. Methods: Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher J. Cleary, Summer B. Cook, Ashley A. Herda
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-01-01
Series:Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000674
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832087729380261888
author Christopher J. Cleary
Summer B. Cook
Ashley A. Herda
author_facet Christopher J. Cleary
Summer B. Cook
Ashley A. Herda
author_sort Christopher J. Cleary
collection DOAJ
description Background/objective: This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height. Methods: Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate in four sessions: familiarization, 3-min rest interval with no jumps (CON), and two randomized experimental sessions with a rest interval of either 1-min (ER1) or 5-min (ER5) after a series of tuck jumps. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was assessed at baseline (PRE) and after (POST) the CON, ER1, and ER5 conditions, and 10-s Wingate cycling testing. Wingate relative peak power (RPP) and mean peak power (RMP) were measured. Separate mixed-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance assessed changes across conditions and sex for the Wingate variables and conditions, sex, and time for CMJ height at an alpha of p ≤ 0.05. Results: RPP and RMP were significantly greater than CON for ER1 by 0.92 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.41 ± 0.14 W kg−1, respectively, and ER5 by 0.77 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.36 ± 0.10 W kg−1, respectively. ER1 and ER5 RPP and RMP were similar (p > 0.05). For CMJ height, there was only a main effect for sex as males jumped higher than females by 31.3 % (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Performing tuck jumps prior to anaerobic exercise may increase performance for up to 5-min.
format Article
id doaj-art-5f8ca74e7819499090584b41fb81ac0f
institution Kabale University
issn 1728-869X
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
spelling doaj-art-5f8ca74e7819499090584b41fb81ac0f2025-02-06T05:11:23ZengElsevierJournal of Exercise Science & Fitness1728-869X2025-01-0123116Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performanceChristopher J. Cleary0Summer B. Cook1Ashley A. Herda2Department of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas Edwards Campus, Overland Park, KS, USADepartment of Kinesiology, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USADepartment of Health, Sport, and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas Edwards Campus, Overland Park, KS, USA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA; Corresponding author. 12604 Quivira Road, BEST 350X, Overland Park, KS, 66213, USA.Background/objective: This study assessed the influence of rest interval duration after tuck jumps on 10-s Wingate outcomes and countermovement jump height. Methods: Eighteen resistance trained individuals (males: n = 10, 21.3 ± 3.6 years; females: n = 8, 22.1 ± 2.2 years) volunteered to participate in four sessions: familiarization, 3-min rest interval with no jumps (CON), and two randomized experimental sessions with a rest interval of either 1-min (ER1) or 5-min (ER5) after a series of tuck jumps. Countermovement jump (CMJ) height was assessed at baseline (PRE) and after (POST) the CON, ER1, and ER5 conditions, and 10-s Wingate cycling testing. Wingate relative peak power (RPP) and mean peak power (RMP) were measured. Separate mixed-factorial repeated measures analyses of variance assessed changes across conditions and sex for the Wingate variables and conditions, sex, and time for CMJ height at an alpha of p ≤ 0.05. Results: RPP and RMP were significantly greater than CON for ER1 by 0.92 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.41 ± 0.14 W kg−1, respectively, and ER5 by 0.77 ± 0.23 W kg−1 and 0.36 ± 0.10 W kg−1, respectively. ER1 and ER5 RPP and RMP were similar (p > 0.05). For CMJ height, there was only a main effect for sex as males jumped higher than females by 31.3 % (p = 0.002). Conclusion: Performing tuck jumps prior to anaerobic exercise may increase performance for up to 5-min.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000674WingatePostactivationPlyometricsErgogenic
spellingShingle Christopher J. Cleary
Summer B. Cook
Ashley A. Herda
Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness
Wingate
Postactivation
Plyometrics
Ergogenic
title Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
title_full Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
title_fullStr Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
title_short Evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
title_sort evaluation of rest interval following a series of tuck jumps on anaerobic performance
topic Wingate
Postactivation
Plyometrics
Ergogenic
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1728869X24000674
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherjcleary evaluationofrestintervalfollowingaseriesoftuckjumpsonanaerobicperformance
AT summerbcook evaluationofrestintervalfollowingaseriesoftuckjumpsonanaerobicperformance
AT ashleyaherda evaluationofrestintervalfollowingaseriesoftuckjumpsonanaerobicperformance