Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail
The objective of our paper consists in testing on the ground the concept of governance, which should be understood as a form of intervention by companies in public action. Using the social problem of “racial” discrimination in the workplace, we will show how this has been taken up by private players...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles
2014-07-01
|
| Series: | Développement Durable et Territoires |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/1880 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832095538920554496 |
|---|---|
| author | Romain Huët Morgane Cantrelle |
| author_facet | Romain Huët Morgane Cantrelle |
| author_sort | Romain Huët |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The objective of our paper consists in testing on the ground the concept of governance, which should be understood as a form of intervention by companies in public action. Using the social problem of “racial” discrimination in the workplace, we will show how this has been taken up by private players in initiatives such as the production of reports on the subject (Bébéar 2004, Sabeg and Méhaignerie 2004…) and in the recent signing of the “Charter of diversity” by forty french firms. In fact, these various initiatives (reports, charters…), show how private players are tempted to build on a public problem, to influence relations with the State, to legitimise and support their own explanations of what is real, their own ways of defining the causes, and their solutions. The fact that the question of discrimination has been appropriated by private players is a testimony to their increasing participation in political decision-making, and thus illustrates a way of working which is codified from the point of view of a negotiated standard, and partly characterised by the tools and procedures of governance. Thus, starting from the premise that governance is a way of working codified from the point of view of a negotiated standard, we have studied the Charter of Diversity in business which was published in October 2004. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-33134603c9b74cd1ac2dbbfe37864e99 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1772-9971 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2014-07-01 |
| publisher | Réseau Développement Durable et Territoires Fragiles |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Développement Durable et Territoires |
| spelling | doaj-art-33134603c9b74cd1ac2dbbfe37864e992025-02-05T16:35:34ZfraRéseau Développement Durable et Territoires FragilesDéveloppement Durable et Territoires1772-99712014-07-0110.4000/developpementdurable.1880Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travailRomain HuëtMorgane CantrelleThe objective of our paper consists in testing on the ground the concept of governance, which should be understood as a form of intervention by companies in public action. Using the social problem of “racial” discrimination in the workplace, we will show how this has been taken up by private players in initiatives such as the production of reports on the subject (Bébéar 2004, Sabeg and Méhaignerie 2004…) and in the recent signing of the “Charter of diversity” by forty french firms. In fact, these various initiatives (reports, charters…), show how private players are tempted to build on a public problem, to influence relations with the State, to legitimise and support their own explanations of what is real, their own ways of defining the causes, and their solutions. The fact that the question of discrimination has been appropriated by private players is a testimony to their increasing participation in political decision-making, and thus illustrates a way of working which is codified from the point of view of a negotiated standard, and partly characterised by the tools and procedures of governance. Thus, starting from the premise that governance is a way of working codified from the point of view of a negotiated standard, we have studied the Charter of Diversity in business which was published in October 2004.https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/1880responsabilité sociale des entrepriseschartes et codes de conduiteaction publiquediscriminationsgouvernancecommunication |
| spellingShingle | Romain Huët Morgane Cantrelle Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail Développement Durable et Territoires responsabilité sociale des entreprises chartes et codes de conduite action publique discriminations gouvernance communication |
| title | Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail |
| title_full | Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail |
| title_fullStr | Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail |
| title_full_unstemmed | Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail |
| title_short | Gouvernance et acteurs privés : le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail |
| title_sort | gouvernance et acteurs prives le cas de la lutte contre les discriminations au travail |
| topic | responsabilité sociale des entreprises chartes et codes de conduite action publique discriminations gouvernance communication |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/developpementdurable/1880 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT romainhuet gouvernanceetacteurspriveslecasdelaluttecontrelesdiscriminationsautravail AT morganecantrelle gouvernanceetacteurspriveslecasdelaluttecontrelesdiscriminationsautravail |