Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family

Introduction. Germline aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations are responsible for 15–30% of familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPAs). We report a FIPA kindred with a heterozygous deletion in AIP, aiming to highlight the indications and benefits of genetic screening, variab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pedro Marques, Sayka Barry, Amy Ronaldson, Arla Ogilvie, Helen L. Storr, Peter J. Goadsby, Michael Powell, Mary N. Dang, Harvinder S. Chahal, Jane Evanson, Ajith V. Kumar, Joan Grieve, Márta Korbonits
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Endocrinology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8581626
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567770186776576
author Pedro Marques
Sayka Barry
Amy Ronaldson
Arla Ogilvie
Helen L. Storr
Peter J. Goadsby
Michael Powell
Mary N. Dang
Harvinder S. Chahal
Jane Evanson
Ajith V. Kumar
Joan Grieve
Márta Korbonits
author_facet Pedro Marques
Sayka Barry
Amy Ronaldson
Arla Ogilvie
Helen L. Storr
Peter J. Goadsby
Michael Powell
Mary N. Dang
Harvinder S. Chahal
Jane Evanson
Ajith V. Kumar
Joan Grieve
Márta Korbonits
author_sort Pedro Marques
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. Germline aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations are responsible for 15–30% of familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPAs). We report a FIPA kindred with a heterozygous deletion in AIP, aiming to highlight the indications and benefits of genetic screening, variability in clinical presentations, and management challenges in this setting. Patients. An 18-year-old male was diagnosed with a clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). Two years later, his brother was diagnosed with a somatolactotrophinoma, and a small Rathke’s cleft cyst and a microadenoma were detected on screening in their 17-year-old sister. Following amenorrhoea, their maternal cousin was diagnosed with hyperprolactinaemia and two distinct pituitary microadenomas. A 12-year-old niece developed headache and her MRI showed a microadenoma, not seen on a pituitary MRI scan 3 years earlier. Discussion. Out of the 14 members harbouring germline AIP mutations in this kindred, 5 have pituitary adenoma. Affected members had different features and courses of disease. Bulky pituitary and not fully suppressed GH on OGTT can be challenging in the evaluation of females in teenage years. Multiple pituitary adenomas with different secretory profiles may arise in the pituitary of these patients. Small, stable NFPAs can be present in mutation carriers, similar to incidentalomas in the general population. Genetic screening and baseline review, with follow-up of younger subjects, are recommended in AIP mutation-positive families.
format Article
id doaj-art-fe4e9a88f40a4a32a75a926983efab79
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8337
1687-8345
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Endocrinology
spelling doaj-art-fe4e9a88f40a4a32a75a926983efab792025-02-03T01:00:36ZengWileyInternational Journal of Endocrinology1687-83371687-83452018-01-01201810.1155/2018/85816268581626Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive FamilyPedro Marques0Sayka Barry1Amy Ronaldson2Arla Ogilvie3Helen L. Storr4Peter J. Goadsby5Michael Powell6Mary N. Dang7Harvinder S. Chahal8Jane Evanson9Ajith V. Kumar10Joan Grieve11Márta Korbonits12Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKWest Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford, UKCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKBasic & Clinical Neuroscience and NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility, King’s College London, London, UKThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH, NHS Trust, London, UKCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKDepartment of Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UKDepartment of Radiology, Barts and the London School of Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UKNorth East Thames Regional Genetics Service, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UKThe National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, UCLH, NHS Trust, London, UKCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UKIntroduction. Germline aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) mutations are responsible for 15–30% of familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPAs). We report a FIPA kindred with a heterozygous deletion in AIP, aiming to highlight the indications and benefits of genetic screening, variability in clinical presentations, and management challenges in this setting. Patients. An 18-year-old male was diagnosed with a clinically nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). Two years later, his brother was diagnosed with a somatolactotrophinoma, and a small Rathke’s cleft cyst and a microadenoma were detected on screening in their 17-year-old sister. Following amenorrhoea, their maternal cousin was diagnosed with hyperprolactinaemia and two distinct pituitary microadenomas. A 12-year-old niece developed headache and her MRI showed a microadenoma, not seen on a pituitary MRI scan 3 years earlier. Discussion. Out of the 14 members harbouring germline AIP mutations in this kindred, 5 have pituitary adenoma. Affected members had different features and courses of disease. Bulky pituitary and not fully suppressed GH on OGTT can be challenging in the evaluation of females in teenage years. Multiple pituitary adenomas with different secretory profiles may arise in the pituitary of these patients. Small, stable NFPAs can be present in mutation carriers, similar to incidentalomas in the general population. Genetic screening and baseline review, with follow-up of younger subjects, are recommended in AIP mutation-positive families.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8581626
spellingShingle Pedro Marques
Sayka Barry
Amy Ronaldson
Arla Ogilvie
Helen L. Storr
Peter J. Goadsby
Michael Powell
Mary N. Dang
Harvinder S. Chahal
Jane Evanson
Ajith V. Kumar
Joan Grieve
Márta Korbonits
Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family
International Journal of Endocrinology
title Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family
title_full Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family
title_fullStr Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family
title_full_unstemmed Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family
title_short Emergence of Pituitary Adenoma in a Child during Surveillance: Clinical Challenges and the Family Members’ View in an AIP Mutation-Positive Family
title_sort emergence of pituitary adenoma in a child during surveillance clinical challenges and the family members view in an aip mutation positive family
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/8581626
work_keys_str_mv AT pedromarques emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT saykabarry emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT amyronaldson emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT arlaogilvie emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT helenlstorr emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT peterjgoadsby emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT michaelpowell emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT maryndang emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT harvinderschahal emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT janeevanson emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT ajithvkumar emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT joangrieve emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily
AT martakorbonits emergenceofpituitaryadenomainachildduringsurveillanceclinicalchallengesandthefamilymembersviewinanaipmutationpositivefamily