Judges versus artificial intelligence in juror decision-making in criminal trials: Evidence from two pre-registered experiments.
<h4>Background</h4>Artificial intelligence (AI) is anticipated to play a significant role in criminal trials involving citizen jurors. Prior studies have suggested that AI is not widely preferred in ethical decision-making contexts, but little research has compared jurors' reliance...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Eiichiro Watamura, Yichen Liu, Tomohiro Ioku |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0318486 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Juror Characteristics and Decision Making in a Developed Coercive Control Case
by: Kacey May Barnett, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
Making legal sense: on jurors’ discovery of objectivity in Argentina’s experience of lay participation in criminal trials
by: Santiago Abel Amietta
Published: (2025-07-01) -
The Role of Stereotypes in Jurors’ Indian Status Determinations and Guilt Decisions
by: Kimberly Schweitzer, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01) -
The Usage of Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence) as material for consideration of the judge's decision In the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia
by: Syamsul Fatoni, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Criminal Disparity in Judges' Decisions on The Crime of Sexual Intercourse Against Minors
by: Yuniar Yudha Himawan, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)