Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data

Abstract Higher‐order ionospheric corrections, including second‐ and third‐order effects and signal bending, are essential for improving Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series accuracy. However, their influence on long‐term Precise Point Positioning (PPP) time series, particularly sig...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kaichun Yang, Weiping Jiang, Zhao Li, Xin Ding, Ran Lu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2024-12-01
Series:Space Weather
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004178
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832575435722981376
author Kaichun Yang
Weiping Jiang
Zhao Li
Xin Ding
Ran Lu
author_facet Kaichun Yang
Weiping Jiang
Zhao Li
Xin Ding
Ran Lu
author_sort Kaichun Yang
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Higher‐order ionospheric corrections, including second‐ and third‐order effects and signal bending, are essential for improving Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series accuracy. However, their influence on long‐term Precise Point Positioning (PPP) time series, particularly signal bending, remains underexplored. Most studies rely on Global Ionosphere Maps (GIMs) for second‐order delay corrections due to the complexity of RINEX‐based inversions. Analyzing data from 37 International GNSS Service stations (2009–2020), we found that higher‐order ionospheric effects predominantly impact the North component of mid‐ and low‐latitude stations. Second‐ and third‐order delays contribute 50% and 20% to annual and semi‐annual amplitudes, respectively, while signal bending accounts for 5% and 2%. Additionally, signals traveling along the magnetic field direction induce phase delays, with equatorial regions experiencing more frequent and intense ionospheric activity. This leads to maximum horizontal velocity impacts of 0.45 mm/yr at the equator and a distinct southern trend at mid‐ and low‐latitudes. GIM‐based corrections increase seasonal signal amplitudes and root mean square error (RMSE) at some stations due to discrepancies with RINEX‐based corrections, which generate higher‐order ionospheric residuals. These residuals contribute 48.6% of the RMSE in RINEX‐based corrections, surpassing the 39.8% from second‐ and third‐order delays. To address this, we propose a GIM‐based residual model incorporating horizontal gradients, reducing RMSE by 48%, 26%, and 52% for the East, North, and Up components, respectively. Monthly or quarterly gradient updates during quiet ionospheric periods ensure precise corrections, enhancing GNSS time series and coordinate system accuracy.
format Article
id doaj-art-fb9ca0a8b7734d26bb363efed62530a6
institution Kabale University
issn 1542-7390
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Space Weather
spelling doaj-art-fb9ca0a8b7734d26bb363efed62530a62025-02-01T08:10:33ZengWileySpace Weather1542-73902024-12-012212n/an/a10.1029/2024SW004178Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX DataKaichun Yang0Weiping Jiang1Zhao Li2Xin Ding3Ran Lu4GNSS Research Center Hubei Luojia Laboratory Wuhan University Wuhan ChinaGNSS Research Center Hubei Luojia Laboratory Wuhan University Wuhan ChinaGNSS Research Center Hubei Luojia Laboratory Wuhan University Wuhan ChinaGNSS Research Center Hubei Luojia Laboratory Wuhan University Wuhan ChinaGNSS Research Center Hubei Luojia Laboratory Wuhan University Wuhan ChinaAbstract Higher‐order ionospheric corrections, including second‐ and third‐order effects and signal bending, are essential for improving Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) time series accuracy. However, their influence on long‐term Precise Point Positioning (PPP) time series, particularly signal bending, remains underexplored. Most studies rely on Global Ionosphere Maps (GIMs) for second‐order delay corrections due to the complexity of RINEX‐based inversions. Analyzing data from 37 International GNSS Service stations (2009–2020), we found that higher‐order ionospheric effects predominantly impact the North component of mid‐ and low‐latitude stations. Second‐ and third‐order delays contribute 50% and 20% to annual and semi‐annual amplitudes, respectively, while signal bending accounts for 5% and 2%. Additionally, signals traveling along the magnetic field direction induce phase delays, with equatorial regions experiencing more frequent and intense ionospheric activity. This leads to maximum horizontal velocity impacts of 0.45 mm/yr at the equator and a distinct southern trend at mid‐ and low‐latitudes. GIM‐based corrections increase seasonal signal amplitudes and root mean square error (RMSE) at some stations due to discrepancies with RINEX‐based corrections, which generate higher‐order ionospheric residuals. These residuals contribute 48.6% of the RMSE in RINEX‐based corrections, surpassing the 39.8% from second‐ and third‐order delays. To address this, we propose a GIM‐based residual model incorporating horizontal gradients, reducing RMSE by 48%, 26%, and 52% for the East, North, and Up components, respectively. Monthly or quarterly gradient updates during quiet ionospheric periods ensure precise corrections, enhancing GNSS time series and coordinate system accuracy.https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004178higher‐order ionospheric delayGNSS coordinate time seriessignal bendinghorizontal gradientsglobal ionosphere mapshigher‐order ionospheric residuals
spellingShingle Kaichun Yang
Weiping Jiang
Zhao Li
Xin Ding
Ran Lu
Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data
Space Weather
higher‐order ionospheric delay
GNSS coordinate time series
signal bending
horizontal gradients
global ionosphere maps
higher‐order ionospheric residuals
title Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data
title_full Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data
title_short Comparative Analysis of Higher‐Order Ionospheric Delay on PPP Long‐Term Coordinate Time Series and Residual Modeling Using Horizontal Gradients and RINEX Data
title_sort comparative analysis of higher order ionospheric delay on ppp long term coordinate time series and residual modeling using horizontal gradients and rinex data
topic higher‐order ionospheric delay
GNSS coordinate time series
signal bending
horizontal gradients
global ionosphere maps
higher‐order ionospheric residuals
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW004178
work_keys_str_mv AT kaichunyang comparativeanalysisofhigherorderionosphericdelayonppplongtermcoordinatetimeseriesandresidualmodelingusinghorizontalgradientsandrinexdata
AT weipingjiang comparativeanalysisofhigherorderionosphericdelayonppplongtermcoordinatetimeseriesandresidualmodelingusinghorizontalgradientsandrinexdata
AT zhaoli comparativeanalysisofhigherorderionosphericdelayonppplongtermcoordinatetimeseriesandresidualmodelingusinghorizontalgradientsandrinexdata
AT xinding comparativeanalysisofhigherorderionosphericdelayonppplongtermcoordinatetimeseriesandresidualmodelingusinghorizontalgradientsandrinexdata
AT ranlu comparativeanalysisofhigherorderionosphericdelayonppplongtermcoordinatetimeseriesandresidualmodelingusinghorizontalgradientsandrinexdata