Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond

The actual burden and future burden of the small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies turn their screening in pregnancy a question of major concern for clinicians and policymakers. Half of stillbirths are due to growth restriction in utero, and possibly, a quarter of livebirths of low- and middle-income...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Debora F. B. Leite, Jose G. Cecatti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1519048
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561121792360448
author Debora F. B. Leite
Jose G. Cecatti
author_facet Debora F. B. Leite
Jose G. Cecatti
author_sort Debora F. B. Leite
collection DOAJ
description The actual burden and future burden of the small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies turn their screening in pregnancy a question of major concern for clinicians and policymakers. Half of stillbirths are due to growth restriction in utero, and possibly, a quarter of livebirths of low- and middle-income countries are SGA. Growing body of evidence shows their higher risk of adverse outcomes at any period of life, including increased rates of neurologic delay, noncommunicable chronic diseases (central obesity and metabolic syndrome), and mortality. Although there is no consensus regarding its definition, birthweight centile threshold, or follow-up, we believe birthweight <10th centile is the most suitable cutoff for clinical and epidemiological purposes. Maternal clinical factors have modest predictive accuracy; being born SGA appears to be of transgenerational heredity. Addition of ultrasound parameters improves prediction models, especially using estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Placental growth factor levels are decreased in SGA pregnancies, and it is the most promising biomarker in differentiating angiogenesis-related SGA from other causes. Unfortunately, however, only few societies recommend universal screening. SGA evaluation is the first step of a multidimensional approach, which includes adequate management and long-term follow-up of these newborns. Apart from only meliorating perinatal outcomes, we hypothesize SGA screening is a key for socioeconomic progress.
format Article
id doaj-art-fa02f0e30a8c4c13b1564f543d654740
institution Kabale University
issn 2356-6140
1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-fa02f0e30a8c4c13b1564f543d6547402025-02-03T01:25:55ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2019-01-01201910.1155/2019/15190481519048Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyondDebora F. B. Leite0Jose G. Cecatti1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, School of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Sao Paulo, BrazilDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas, School of Medical Sciences, Campinas, Sao Paulo, BrazilThe actual burden and future burden of the small-for-gestational-age (SGA) babies turn their screening in pregnancy a question of major concern for clinicians and policymakers. Half of stillbirths are due to growth restriction in utero, and possibly, a quarter of livebirths of low- and middle-income countries are SGA. Growing body of evidence shows their higher risk of adverse outcomes at any period of life, including increased rates of neurologic delay, noncommunicable chronic diseases (central obesity and metabolic syndrome), and mortality. Although there is no consensus regarding its definition, birthweight centile threshold, or follow-up, we believe birthweight <10th centile is the most suitable cutoff for clinical and epidemiological purposes. Maternal clinical factors have modest predictive accuracy; being born SGA appears to be of transgenerational heredity. Addition of ultrasound parameters improves prediction models, especially using estimated fetal weight and abdominal circumference in the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. Placental growth factor levels are decreased in SGA pregnancies, and it is the most promising biomarker in differentiating angiogenesis-related SGA from other causes. Unfortunately, however, only few societies recommend universal screening. SGA evaluation is the first step of a multidimensional approach, which includes adequate management and long-term follow-up of these newborns. Apart from only meliorating perinatal outcomes, we hypothesize SGA screening is a key for socioeconomic progress.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1519048
spellingShingle Debora F. B. Leite
Jose G. Cecatti
Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond
The Scientific World Journal
title Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond
title_full Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond
title_fullStr Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond
title_full_unstemmed Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond
title_short Fetal Growth Restriction Prediction: How to Move beyond
title_sort fetal growth restriction prediction how to move beyond
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1519048
work_keys_str_mv AT deborafbleite fetalgrowthrestrictionpredictionhowtomovebeyond
AT josegcecatti fetalgrowthrestrictionpredictionhowtomovebeyond