Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial

Objective of the study: To compare the results of circumcision by open technique and the Plastibell technique in male babies. Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, 1440 babies whose circumcision was done as religious rite were divided into two groups. Group A underwent...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Muhammad Iqbal, Sadaf Ijaz, Muhammad Hassan Zafar, Naveed Akhtar Malik
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1960
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832086994740576256
author Muhammad Iqbal
Sadaf Ijaz
Muhammad Hassan Zafar
Naveed Akhtar Malik
author_facet Muhammad Iqbal
Sadaf Ijaz
Muhammad Hassan Zafar
Naveed Akhtar Malik
author_sort Muhammad Iqbal
collection DOAJ
description Objective of the study: To compare the results of circumcision by open technique and the Plastibell technique in male babies. Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, 1440 babies whose circumcision was done as religious rite were divided into two groups. Group A underwent circumcision by open technique whereas group B underwent circumcision by Plastibell method. Results: Majority 720 (50%) were in age group 6-8 weeks. Compared with open method, significantly less number of patients in plastibel method experienced moderate pain (47.91% versus 35% p value .00001 and severe pain 31.94% versus 9.02% p value .00001.Rate of wound infection was significantly less in plastibell method 2.77% versus 4.86% p value .020. However more patients in plastibell technique needed re-do circumcision 4.02% versus 1.94% p value .0202. Overall greater parent’s satisfaction was attained with plastibel method. Conclusion: Plastibell technique has many advantages over open method in terms less post op pain, wound infection, and greater cosmetic  satisfaction however more patients will need re-do circumcision in this technique compared with conventional method. Keywords: Circumcision, open technique, Plastibell, post-op complications
format Article
id doaj-art-f7418b1803984b6692aaefe9f1302eba
institution Kabale University
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
spelling doaj-art-f7418b1803984b6692aaefe9f1302eba2025-02-06T08:45:20ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702022-12-0126410.37939/jrmc.v26i4.1960Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trialMuhammad IqbalSadaf IjazMuhammad Hassan ZafarNaveed Akhtar Malik Objective of the study: To compare the results of circumcision by open technique and the Plastibell technique in male babies. Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, 1440 babies whose circumcision was done as religious rite were divided into two groups. Group A underwent circumcision by open technique whereas group B underwent circumcision by Plastibell method. Results: Majority 720 (50%) were in age group 6-8 weeks. Compared with open method, significantly less number of patients in plastibel method experienced moderate pain (47.91% versus 35% p value .00001 and severe pain 31.94% versus 9.02% p value .00001.Rate of wound infection was significantly less in plastibell method 2.77% versus 4.86% p value .020. However more patients in plastibell technique needed re-do circumcision 4.02% versus 1.94% p value .0202. Overall greater parent’s satisfaction was attained with plastibel method. Conclusion: Plastibell technique has many advantages over open method in terms less post op pain, wound infection, and greater cosmetic  satisfaction however more patients will need re-do circumcision in this technique compared with conventional method. Keywords: Circumcision, open technique, Plastibell, post-op complications https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1960
spellingShingle Muhammad Iqbal
Sadaf Ijaz
Muhammad Hassan Zafar
Naveed Akhtar Malik
Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
title Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
title_full Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
title_fullStr Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
title_short Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
title_sort comparison of open vs plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction a randomized control trial
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1960
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadiqbal comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial
AT sadafijaz comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial
AT muhammadhassanzafar comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial
AT naveedakhtarmalik comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial