Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial
Objective of the study: To compare the results of circumcision by open technique and the Plastibell technique in male babies. Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, 1440 babies whose circumcision was done as religious rite were divided into two groups. Group A underwent...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Rawalpindi Medical University
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College |
Online Access: | https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1960 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832086994740576256 |
---|---|
author | Muhammad Iqbal Sadaf Ijaz Muhammad Hassan Zafar Naveed Akhtar Malik |
author_facet | Muhammad Iqbal Sadaf Ijaz Muhammad Hassan Zafar Naveed Akhtar Malik |
author_sort | Muhammad Iqbal |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Objective of the study: To compare the results of circumcision by open technique and the Plastibell
technique in male babies.
Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, 1440 babies whose circumcision
was done as religious rite were divided into two groups. Group A underwent circumcision by open
technique whereas group B underwent circumcision by Plastibell method.
Results: Majority 720 (50%) were in age group 6-8 weeks. Compared with open method,
significantly less number of patients in plastibel method experienced moderate pain (47.91% versus 35% p value .00001 and severe pain 31.94% versus 9.02% p value .00001.Rate of wound infection was significantly less in plastibell method 2.77% versus 4.86% p value .020. However more patients in plastibell technique needed re-do circumcision 4.02% versus 1.94% p value .0202. Overall greater parent’s satisfaction was attained with plastibel method.
Conclusion: Plastibell technique has many advantages over open method in terms less post op pain, wound infection, and greater cosmetic satisfaction however more patients will need re-do circumcision in this technique compared with conventional method.
Keywords: Circumcision, open technique, Plastibell, post-op complications
|
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-f7418b1803984b6692aaefe9f1302eba |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1683-3562 1683-3570 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
publisher | Rawalpindi Medical University |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College |
spelling | doaj-art-f7418b1803984b6692aaefe9f1302eba2025-02-06T08:45:20ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702022-12-0126410.37939/jrmc.v26i4.1960Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trialMuhammad IqbalSadaf IjazMuhammad Hassan ZafarNaveed Akhtar Malik Objective of the study: To compare the results of circumcision by open technique and the Plastibell technique in male babies. Methods: In this randomized controlled interventional study, 1440 babies whose circumcision was done as religious rite were divided into two groups. Group A underwent circumcision by open technique whereas group B underwent circumcision by Plastibell method. Results: Majority 720 (50%) were in age group 6-8 weeks. Compared with open method, significantly less number of patients in plastibel method experienced moderate pain (47.91% versus 35% p value .00001 and severe pain 31.94% versus 9.02% p value .00001.Rate of wound infection was significantly less in plastibell method 2.77% versus 4.86% p value .020. However more patients in plastibell technique needed re-do circumcision 4.02% versus 1.94% p value .0202. Overall greater parent’s satisfaction was attained with plastibel method. Conclusion: Plastibell technique has many advantages over open method in terms less post op pain, wound infection, and greater cosmetic satisfaction however more patients will need re-do circumcision in this technique compared with conventional method. Keywords: Circumcision, open technique, Plastibell, post-op complications https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1960 |
spellingShingle | Muhammad Iqbal Sadaf Ijaz Muhammad Hassan Zafar Naveed Akhtar Malik Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College |
title | Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial |
title_full | Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial |
title_short | Comparison of open vs Plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction;A randomized control trial |
title_sort | comparison of open vs plastibell techniques of circumcision for surgical outcomes and cosmetic satisfaction a randomized control trial |
url | https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1960 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadiqbal comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial AT sadafijaz comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial AT muhammadhassanzafar comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial AT naveedakhtarmalik comparisonofopenvsplastibelltechniquesofcircumcisionforsurgicaloutcomesandcosmeticsatisfactionarandomizedcontroltrial |