Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities

Purpose. This US FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study evaluated the extended use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in catheter-dependent men with urinary retention who were not deemed candidates for corrective surgery but demonstrated bladder contractility. Materials and Methods....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angelo J. Cambio, Richard M. Roach, Paul Arnold, Joseph Cambio, Clifford D. Gluck, Sean P. Heron
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Advances in Urology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7367851
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832550947225600000
author Angelo J. Cambio
Richard M. Roach
Paul Arnold
Joseph Cambio
Clifford D. Gluck
Sean P. Heron
author_facet Angelo J. Cambio
Richard M. Roach
Paul Arnold
Joseph Cambio
Clifford D. Gluck
Sean P. Heron
author_sort Angelo J. Cambio
collection DOAJ
description Purpose. This US FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study evaluated the extended use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in catheter-dependent men with urinary retention who were not deemed candidates for corrective surgery but demonstrated bladder contractility. Materials and Methods. The Spanner was placed for 3 cycles of 30 days in catheter-dependent men with comorbid conditions, confirmed detrusor contractility, and catheter-associated discomfort. At each visit, postvoid residual, maximum flow rate, international prostate symptom score, quality of life, and adverse events were assessed. Voiding success was defined as PVR ≤ 150 ml at all visits. Results. One hundred seven men were enrolled at 8 US sites; 82/107 (76.6%) completed the trial, and 79/107 (73.8%) successfully maintained PVR ≤ 150 ml for the trial duration. Patients were 77.1 ± 10.6 years old; 63/107 (58.9%) were dependent on Foley and 40/107 (37.4%) on intermittent catheterization for 36.0 ± 39.3 days and 30.2 ± 45.8 days, respectively. 25/107 (23.4%) discontinuations were primarily due to voluntary patient withdrawal 9/107 (8.4%), investigator-initiated withdrawal 8/107 (7.5%), or lack of effectiveness 4/107 (3.7%). During Spanner use, the mean Qmax was 11.2 ± 6.6, mean IPSS was 7.5 ± 6.4, and mean QOL was 2.0 ± 1.6. The most prevalent device-related adverse events were asymptomatic bacteriuria 25/107 (23.4%), discomfort 10/107 (9.4%), and urinary urgency 8/107 (7.5%). No device-related serious AEs were reported. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that catheter-dependent men with sufficient bladder contractility can achieve volitional voiding and successful bladder drainage using The Spanner Temporary Prostatic Stent for extended periods of time.
format Article
id doaj-art-f5e80335254a44f8b3f4c5e5d150645d
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6377
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Urology
spelling doaj-art-f5e80335254a44f8b3f4c5e5d150645d2025-02-03T06:05:32ZengWileyAdvances in Urology1687-63772022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7367851Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with ComorbiditiesAngelo J. Cambio0Richard M. Roach1Paul Arnold2Joseph Cambio3Clifford D. Gluck4Sean P. Heron5Brown Urology Brown PhysiciansAdvanced Urology InstituteAdvanced Urology InstituteBrown Urology Brown PhysiciansCarney HospitalPinellas UrologyPurpose. This US FDA investigational device exemption (IDE) study evaluated the extended use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in catheter-dependent men with urinary retention who were not deemed candidates for corrective surgery but demonstrated bladder contractility. Materials and Methods. The Spanner was placed for 3 cycles of 30 days in catheter-dependent men with comorbid conditions, confirmed detrusor contractility, and catheter-associated discomfort. At each visit, postvoid residual, maximum flow rate, international prostate symptom score, quality of life, and adverse events were assessed. Voiding success was defined as PVR ≤ 150 ml at all visits. Results. One hundred seven men were enrolled at 8 US sites; 82/107 (76.6%) completed the trial, and 79/107 (73.8%) successfully maintained PVR ≤ 150 ml for the trial duration. Patients were 77.1 ± 10.6 years old; 63/107 (58.9%) were dependent on Foley and 40/107 (37.4%) on intermittent catheterization for 36.0 ± 39.3 days and 30.2 ± 45.8 days, respectively. 25/107 (23.4%) discontinuations were primarily due to voluntary patient withdrawal 9/107 (8.4%), investigator-initiated withdrawal 8/107 (7.5%), or lack of effectiveness 4/107 (3.7%). During Spanner use, the mean Qmax was 11.2 ± 6.6, mean IPSS was 7.5 ± 6.4, and mean QOL was 2.0 ± 1.6. The most prevalent device-related adverse events were asymptomatic bacteriuria 25/107 (23.4%), discomfort 10/107 (9.4%), and urinary urgency 8/107 (7.5%). No device-related serious AEs were reported. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that catheter-dependent men with sufficient bladder contractility can achieve volitional voiding and successful bladder drainage using The Spanner Temporary Prostatic Stent for extended periods of time.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7367851
spellingShingle Angelo J. Cambio
Richard M. Roach
Paul Arnold
Joseph Cambio
Clifford D. Gluck
Sean P. Heron
Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities
Advances in Urology
title Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities
title_full Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities
title_fullStr Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities
title_full_unstemmed Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities
title_short Extended Use of The Spanner® Temporary Prostatic Stent in Catheter-Dependent Men with Comorbidities
title_sort extended use of the spanner r temporary prostatic stent in catheter dependent men with comorbidities
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7367851
work_keys_str_mv AT angelojcambio extendeduseofthespannertemporaryprostaticstentincatheterdependentmenwithcomorbidities
AT richardmroach extendeduseofthespannertemporaryprostaticstentincatheterdependentmenwithcomorbidities
AT paularnold extendeduseofthespannertemporaryprostaticstentincatheterdependentmenwithcomorbidities
AT josephcambio extendeduseofthespannertemporaryprostaticstentincatheterdependentmenwithcomorbidities
AT clifforddgluck extendeduseofthespannertemporaryprostaticstentincatheterdependentmenwithcomorbidities
AT seanpheron extendeduseofthespannertemporaryprostaticstentincatheterdependentmenwithcomorbidities