Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit

This paper aims to develop an effective tool for quantifying the risk of slope failure and identifying the sources of failure risk by combining the limit equilibrium method and the assumption of maximum area of sliding mass with factor of safety = 1. The assumption adopted in this study is firstly v...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xuesong Chu, Liang Li, Yung-ming Cheng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6268079
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559042795405312
author Xuesong Chu
Liang Li
Yung-ming Cheng
author_facet Xuesong Chu
Liang Li
Yung-ming Cheng
author_sort Xuesong Chu
collection DOAJ
description This paper aims to develop an effective tool for quantifying the risk of slope failure and identifying the sources of failure risk by combining the limit equilibrium method and the assumption of maximum area of sliding mass with factor of safety = 1. The assumption adopted in this study is firstly validated through the results from the homogeneous slope model, the laboratory experiment, and the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) program, respectively. Secondly, the proposed method is implemented through the quantification of slope failure risk and the identification of failure sources for a homogeneous slope and a cohesive slope. The conventional method which quantifies the failure risk based on the slip surface with minimum factor of safety (FS) is also performed to enable the comparison with the proposed method. The comparative study has demonstrated that the conventional method tends to underestimate the failure risk due to the negligence of the whole failure process as compared with the proposed method. The failure risk has a tendency to increase as vertical spatial variability of friction angle and Su grow less significant for both proposed method and conventional method. However, the failure sources identified by the conventional method are more likely to decrease as the vertical spatial variability of Su becomes less significant for cohesive slope, whereas the proposed method is able to find a nearly constant number of failure sources by considering the whole process of slope failure. As a result, it is worthwhile to point out that attention is highly recommended to be focused on the failure sources when the spatial variability is less significant, even if it is not considered during the risk mitigation and reinforcing works.
format Article
id doaj-art-f559fed9f7714d5f8903a84962c9f2f7
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-f559fed9f7714d5f8903a84962c9f2f72025-02-03T01:31:01ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942019-01-01201910.1155/2019/62680796268079Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to UnitXuesong Chu0Liang Li1Yung-ming Cheng2School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, ChinaSchool of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, ChinaThis paper aims to develop an effective tool for quantifying the risk of slope failure and identifying the sources of failure risk by combining the limit equilibrium method and the assumption of maximum area of sliding mass with factor of safety = 1. The assumption adopted in this study is firstly validated through the results from the homogeneous slope model, the laboratory experiment, and the smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) program, respectively. Secondly, the proposed method is implemented through the quantification of slope failure risk and the identification of failure sources for a homogeneous slope and a cohesive slope. The conventional method which quantifies the failure risk based on the slip surface with minimum factor of safety (FS) is also performed to enable the comparison with the proposed method. The comparative study has demonstrated that the conventional method tends to underestimate the failure risk due to the negligence of the whole failure process as compared with the proposed method. The failure risk has a tendency to increase as vertical spatial variability of friction angle and Su grow less significant for both proposed method and conventional method. However, the failure sources identified by the conventional method are more likely to decrease as the vertical spatial variability of Su becomes less significant for cohesive slope, whereas the proposed method is able to find a nearly constant number of failure sources by considering the whole process of slope failure. As a result, it is worthwhile to point out that attention is highly recommended to be focused on the failure sources when the spatial variability is less significant, even if it is not considered during the risk mitigation and reinforcing works.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6268079
spellingShingle Xuesong Chu
Liang Li
Yung-ming Cheng
Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit
title_full Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit
title_fullStr Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit
title_full_unstemmed Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit
title_short Risk Assessment of Slope Failure Using Assumption of Maximum Area of Sliding Mass and Factor of Safety Equal to Unit
title_sort risk assessment of slope failure using assumption of maximum area of sliding mass and factor of safety equal to unit
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/6268079
work_keys_str_mv AT xuesongchu riskassessmentofslopefailureusingassumptionofmaximumareaofslidingmassandfactorofsafetyequaltounit
AT liangli riskassessmentofslopefailureusingassumptionofmaximumareaofslidingmassandfactorofsafetyequaltounit
AT yungmingcheng riskassessmentofslopefailureusingassumptionofmaximumareaofslidingmassandfactorofsafetyequaltounit