The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength
This study investigated whether the use of superimposed whole-body vibration (WBV) during cross-education strength training would optimise strength transfer compared to conventional cross-education strength training. Twenty-one healthy, dominant right leg volunteers (21±3 years) were allocated to a...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2012-01-01
|
| Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/504837 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832563258016399360 |
|---|---|
| author | Alicia M. Goodwill Dawson J. Kidgell |
| author_facet | Alicia M. Goodwill Dawson J. Kidgell |
| author_sort | Alicia M. Goodwill |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study investigated whether the use of superimposed whole-body vibration (WBV) during cross-education strength training would optimise strength transfer compared to conventional cross-education strength training. Twenty-one healthy, dominant right leg volunteers (21±3 years) were allocated to a strength training (ST, m=3, f=4), a strength training with WBV (ST + V, m=3, f=4), or a control group (no training, m=3, f=4). Training groups performed 9 sessions over 3 weeks, involving unilateral squats for the right leg, with or without WBV (35 Hz; 2.5 mm amplitude). All groups underwent dynamic single leg maximum strength testing (1RM) and single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) prior to and following training. Strength increased in the trained limb for the ST (41%; ES=1.14) and ST + V (55%; ES=1.03) groups, which resulted in a 35% (ES=0.99) strength transfer to the untrained left leg for the ST group and a 52% (ES=0.97) strength transfer to the untrained leg for the ST + V group, when compared to the control group. No differences in strength transfer between training groups were observed (P=0.15). For the untrained leg, no differences in the peak height of recruitment curves or SICI were observed between ST and ST + V groups (P=1.00). Strength training with WBV does not appear to modulate the cross-transfer of strength to a greater magnitude when compared to conventional cross-education strength training. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-f4c1885b0ad64e6dadb3697ec6f353b8 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1537-744X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Scientific World Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-f4c1885b0ad64e6dadb3697ec6f353b82025-02-03T01:20:45ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2012-01-01201210.1100/2012/504837504837The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of StrengthAlicia M. Goodwill0Dawson J. Kidgell1Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, AustraliaCentre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC 3125, AustraliaThis study investigated whether the use of superimposed whole-body vibration (WBV) during cross-education strength training would optimise strength transfer compared to conventional cross-education strength training. Twenty-one healthy, dominant right leg volunteers (21±3 years) were allocated to a strength training (ST, m=3, f=4), a strength training with WBV (ST + V, m=3, f=4), or a control group (no training, m=3, f=4). Training groups performed 9 sessions over 3 weeks, involving unilateral squats for the right leg, with or without WBV (35 Hz; 2.5 mm amplitude). All groups underwent dynamic single leg maximum strength testing (1RM) and single and paired pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) prior to and following training. Strength increased in the trained limb for the ST (41%; ES=1.14) and ST + V (55%; ES=1.03) groups, which resulted in a 35% (ES=0.99) strength transfer to the untrained left leg for the ST group and a 52% (ES=0.97) strength transfer to the untrained leg for the ST + V group, when compared to the control group. No differences in strength transfer between training groups were observed (P=0.15). For the untrained leg, no differences in the peak height of recruitment curves or SICI were observed between ST and ST + V groups (P=1.00). Strength training with WBV does not appear to modulate the cross-transfer of strength to a greater magnitude when compared to conventional cross-education strength training.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/504837 |
| spellingShingle | Alicia M. Goodwill Dawson J. Kidgell The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength The Scientific World Journal |
| title | The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength |
| title_full | The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength |
| title_fullStr | The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength |
| title_short | The Effects of Whole-Body Vibration on the Cross-Transfer of Strength |
| title_sort | effects of whole body vibration on the cross transfer of strength |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/504837 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT aliciamgoodwill theeffectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength AT dawsonjkidgell theeffectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength AT aliciamgoodwill effectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength AT dawsonjkidgell effectsofwholebodyvibrationonthecrosstransferofstrength |