Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI

Background. There is a paucity of real-world data regarding the clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) interruption (temporary or permanent) among patients at high ischemic risk. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of cardiovascular events after interruption of DAPT in high-ris...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hao-Yu Wang, Bo Xu, Chen-Xi Song, Chang-Dong Guan, Li-Hua Xie, Yan-Yan Zhao, Zhong-Xing Cai, Sheng Yuan, Ke-Fei Dou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3895205
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567487507464192
author Hao-Yu Wang
Bo Xu
Chen-Xi Song
Chang-Dong Guan
Li-Hua Xie
Yan-Yan Zhao
Zhong-Xing Cai
Sheng Yuan
Ke-Fei Dou
author_facet Hao-Yu Wang
Bo Xu
Chen-Xi Song
Chang-Dong Guan
Li-Hua Xie
Yan-Yan Zhao
Zhong-Xing Cai
Sheng Yuan
Ke-Fei Dou
author_sort Hao-Yu Wang
collection DOAJ
description Background. There is a paucity of real-world data regarding the clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) interruption (temporary or permanent) among patients at high ischemic risk. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of cardiovascular events after interruption of DAPT in high-risk PCI population. Methods. This study used data from the Fuwai PCI registry, a large, prospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent PCI. We assessed 3,931 patients with at least 1 high ischemic risk criteria of stent-related recurrent ischemic events proposed in the 2017 ESC guidelines for focused update on DAPT who were free of major cardiac events in the first 12 months. The primary ischemic endpoint was 30-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and the key safety endpoints were BARC class 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and net adverse clinical events. Results. DAPT interruption within 12 months occurred in 1,122 patients (28.5%), most of which were due to bleeding events or patients’ noncompliance to treatment. A multivariate Cox regression model, propensity score (PS) matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score demonstrated that DAPT interruption significantly increased the risk of primary ischemic endpoint compared with prolonged DAPT (3.9% vs. 2.2%; Cox-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.840; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.247 to 2.716; PS matching-HR: 2.049 [1.236–3.399]; IPTW-adjusted HR: 1.843 [1.250–2.717]). This difference was driven mainly by all-cause death (1.8% vs. 0.7%) and MI (1.3% vs. 0.5%). Furthermore, the rate of net adverse clinical events (4.9% vs. 3.2%; Cox-adjusted HR: 1.581 [1.128–2.216]; PS matching-HR: 1.639 [1.075–2.499]; IPTW-adjusted HR: 1.554 [1.110–2.177]) was also higher in patients with DAPT interruption (≤12 months), whereas no significant differences between groups were observed in terms of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. These findings were consistent across various stent-driven high-ischemic risk subsets with respect to the primary ischemic endpoints, with a greater magnitude of harm among patients with diffuse multivessel diabetic coronary artery disease. Conclusions. In patients undergoing high-risk PCI, interruption of DAPT in the first 12 months occurred infrequently and was associated with a significantly higher adjusted risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events. 2017 ESC stent-driven high ischemic risk criteria may help clinicians to discriminate patient selection in the use of long-term DAPT when the ischemic risk certainly overcomes the bleeding one.
format Article
id doaj-art-f2177b685d9745b28ff3fd42044d00a6
institution Kabale University
issn 1540-8183
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
spelling doaj-art-f2177b685d9745b28ff3fd42044d00a62025-02-03T01:01:29ZengWileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832022-01-01202210.1155/2022/3895205Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCIHao-Yu Wang0Bo Xu1Chen-Xi Song2Chang-Dong Guan3Li-Hua Xie4Yan-Yan Zhao5Zhong-Xing Cai6Sheng Yuan7Ke-Fei Dou8Department of CardiologyCatheterization LaboratoriesDepartment of CardiologyCatheterization LaboratoriesCatheterization LaboratoriesMedical Research and Biometrics CenterDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyBackground. There is a paucity of real-world data regarding the clinical impact of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) interruption (temporary or permanent) among patients at high ischemic risk. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of cardiovascular events after interruption of DAPT in high-risk PCI population. Methods. This study used data from the Fuwai PCI registry, a large, prospective cohort of consecutive patients who underwent PCI. We assessed 3,931 patients with at least 1 high ischemic risk criteria of stent-related recurrent ischemic events proposed in the 2017 ESC guidelines for focused update on DAPT who were free of major cardiac events in the first 12 months. The primary ischemic endpoint was 30-month major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, and the key safety endpoints were BARC class 2, 3, or 5 bleeding and net adverse clinical events. Results. DAPT interruption within 12 months occurred in 1,122 patients (28.5%), most of which were due to bleeding events or patients’ noncompliance to treatment. A multivariate Cox regression model, propensity score (PS) matching, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score demonstrated that DAPT interruption significantly increased the risk of primary ischemic endpoint compared with prolonged DAPT (3.9% vs. 2.2%; Cox-adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.840; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.247 to 2.716; PS matching-HR: 2.049 [1.236–3.399]; IPTW-adjusted HR: 1.843 [1.250–2.717]). This difference was driven mainly by all-cause death (1.8% vs. 0.7%) and MI (1.3% vs. 0.5%). Furthermore, the rate of net adverse clinical events (4.9% vs. 3.2%; Cox-adjusted HR: 1.581 [1.128–2.216]; PS matching-HR: 1.639 [1.075–2.499]; IPTW-adjusted HR: 1.554 [1.110–2.177]) was also higher in patients with DAPT interruption (≤12 months), whereas no significant differences between groups were observed in terms of BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding. These findings were consistent across various stent-driven high-ischemic risk subsets with respect to the primary ischemic endpoints, with a greater magnitude of harm among patients with diffuse multivessel diabetic coronary artery disease. Conclusions. In patients undergoing high-risk PCI, interruption of DAPT in the first 12 months occurred infrequently and was associated with a significantly higher adjusted risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events. 2017 ESC stent-driven high ischemic risk criteria may help clinicians to discriminate patient selection in the use of long-term DAPT when the ischemic risk certainly overcomes the bleeding one.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3895205
spellingShingle Hao-Yu Wang
Bo Xu
Chen-Xi Song
Chang-Dong Guan
Li-Hua Xie
Yan-Yan Zhao
Zhong-Xing Cai
Sheng Yuan
Ke-Fei Dou
Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
title Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI
title_full Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI
title_fullStr Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI
title_full_unstemmed Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI
title_short Thrombotic vs. Bleeding Events of Interruption of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy within 12 Months among Patients with Stent-Driven High Ischemic Risk Definition following PCI
title_sort thrombotic vs bleeding events of interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy within 12 months among patients with stent driven high ischemic risk definition following pci
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/3895205
work_keys_str_mv AT haoyuwang thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT boxu thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT chenxisong thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT changdongguan thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT lihuaxie thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT yanyanzhao thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT zhongxingcai thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT shengyuan thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci
AT kefeidou thromboticvsbleedingeventsofinterruptionofdualantiplatelettherapywithin12monthsamongpatientswithstentdrivenhighischemicriskdefinitionfollowingpci