Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?

This paper addresses the question of animal remains (isolated bones and complete skeletons) discovered in the fill of Roman sanctuary wells in northern France and their links with the dismantling of places of worship from the 3rd c. onwards. Several recently excavated sites (Vieil-Évreux, Mesnil-Sai...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sébastien Lepetz, Alice Bourgois
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: CNRS Éditions 2018-12-01
Series:Gallia
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/gallia/2946
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832096493904855040
author Sébastien Lepetz
Alice Bourgois
author_facet Sébastien Lepetz
Alice Bourgois
author_sort Sébastien Lepetz
collection DOAJ
description This paper addresses the question of animal remains (isolated bones and complete skeletons) discovered in the fill of Roman sanctuary wells in northern France and their links with the dismantling of places of worship from the 3rd c. onwards. Several recently excavated sites (Vieil-Évreux, Mesnil-Saint-Nicaise and Ménestreau) and some comparative sites are presented. The main objective of the paper is to determine to what extent the animal remains are linked to the process of destruction and deconsecration. It demonstrates different animal deposits: those trapped naturally, those thrown away voluntarily and those from raptor pellets. For the latter, it appears that some rare habitation site species (raptors, corvids) played a particular role in the abandonment of these wells. The question of their prophylactic or magical role is also addressed. Alongside these wild species, the paper also considers the role of domestic animals (e.g., ox, pig, dog and cat) found in the assemblages. It appears that the principal objective of these deposits was to render the structure unsuitable and to prevent any subsequent use by contaminating the wells and making the water inaccessible and impure.
format Article
id doaj-art-f08e50a9c8dd4469bbcd180a246df751
institution Kabale University
issn 0016-4119
2109-9588
language English
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher CNRS Éditions
record_format Article
series Gallia
spelling doaj-art-f08e50a9c8dd4469bbcd180a246df7512025-02-05T15:46:36ZengCNRS ÉditionsGallia0016-41192109-95882018-12-017517318810.4000/gallia.2946Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?Sébastien LepetzAlice BourgoisThis paper addresses the question of animal remains (isolated bones and complete skeletons) discovered in the fill of Roman sanctuary wells in northern France and their links with the dismantling of places of worship from the 3rd c. onwards. Several recently excavated sites (Vieil-Évreux, Mesnil-Saint-Nicaise and Ménestreau) and some comparative sites are presented. The main objective of the paper is to determine to what extent the animal remains are linked to the process of destruction and deconsecration. It demonstrates different animal deposits: those trapped naturally, those thrown away voluntarily and those from raptor pellets. For the latter, it appears that some rare habitation site species (raptors, corvids) played a particular role in the abandonment of these wells. The question of their prophylactic or magical role is also addressed. Alongside these wild species, the paper also considers the role of domestic animals (e.g., ox, pig, dog and cat) found in the assemblages. It appears that the principal objective of these deposits was to render the structure unsuitable and to prevent any subsequent use by contaminating the wells and making the water inaccessible and impure.https://journals.openedition.org/gallia/2946
spellingShingle Sébastien Lepetz
Alice Bourgois
Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?
Gallia
title Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?
title_full Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?
title_fullStr Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?
title_full_unstemmed Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?
title_short Were sanctuary wells in Roman Gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses (3rd–4th c. AD)?
title_sort were sanctuary wells in roman gaul intentionally contaminated using animal carcasses 3rd 4th c ad
url https://journals.openedition.org/gallia/2946
work_keys_str_mv AT sebastienlepetz weresanctuarywellsinromangaulintentionallycontaminatedusinganimalcarcasses3rd4thcad
AT alicebourgois weresanctuarywellsinromangaulintentionallycontaminatedusinganimalcarcasses3rd4thcad