<i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review

This review provides a data analysis of the test results for farm animal feeds. The analysis is based on the articles published from 1955 to 2020. It was found that the overall pooled prevalence estimates of Salmonella was 0.14: with a prevalence of 0.18 in raw feed components, 0.09 – in finished fe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. B. Shadrova, O. V. Pruntova, G. S. Skitovich, О. А. Akulich
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Da Vinci Media 2022-12-01
Series:Ветеринария сегодня
Subjects:
Online Access:https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/672
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832086776491016192
author N. B. Shadrova
O. V. Pruntova
G. S. Skitovich
О. А. Akulich
author_facet N. B. Shadrova
O. V. Pruntova
G. S. Skitovich
О. А. Akulich
author_sort N. B. Shadrova
collection DOAJ
description This review provides a data analysis of the test results for farm animal feeds. The analysis is based on the articles published from 1955 to 2020. It was found that the overall pooled prevalence estimates of Salmonella was 0.14: with a prevalence of 0.18 in raw feed components, 0.09 – in finished feed and 0.08 – in swabs from the surfaces of feed production equipment. The probability of contaminating raw animal feed components with Salmonella is 3.9 times higher than that for raw vegetable feeds. There is a tendency for Salmonella to be less detected in raw feed components; however, in finished feeds Salmonella detectability has remained unchanged for decades. The Salmonella prevalence in samples taken from environmental objects and surfaces of feed mill production equipment was 0.08. The risk of Salmonella detection at feed mills in the pre-heat treatment zone was 1.5 times higher than the risk of detection in the post-heat treatment zone. The analysis of Salmonella serovariants revealed that S. senftenberg, S. montevideo, S. typhimurium, S. anatum, S. havana, S. enteritidis, S. cerro are isolated everywhere. The S. salford serotype is found only on the African continent. A research into antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates demonstrated resistance to such medicinalproducts as ceftriaxone, carbopenem and imipenem; and full genome sequencing showed at least one antibiotic resistance gene in 40% of Salmonella isolates detected at pig feed production plants.
format Article
id doaj-art-eeff5b0b58434ceeb0959585e9615a4b
institution Kabale University
issn 2304-196X
2658-6959
language English
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Da Vinci Media
record_format Article
series Ветеринария сегодня
spelling doaj-art-eeff5b0b58434ceeb0959585e9615a4b2025-02-06T09:52:09ZengDa Vinci MediaВетеринария сегодня2304-196X2658-69592022-12-0111429029510.29326/2304-196X-2022-11-4-290-295583<i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. ReviewN. B. Shadrova0O. V. Pruntova1G. S. Skitovich2О. А. Akulich3FGBI «Federal Centre for Animal Health» (FGBI «ARRIAH»)FGBI «Federal Centre for Animal Health» (FGBI «ARRIAH»)FGBI «Federal Centre for Animal Health» (FGBI «ARRIAH»)Rosselkhoznadzor Territorial Administration for Vladimir, Kostroma and Ivanovo OblastsThis review provides a data analysis of the test results for farm animal feeds. The analysis is based on the articles published from 1955 to 2020. It was found that the overall pooled prevalence estimates of Salmonella was 0.14: with a prevalence of 0.18 in raw feed components, 0.09 – in finished feed and 0.08 – in swabs from the surfaces of feed production equipment. The probability of contaminating raw animal feed components with Salmonella is 3.9 times higher than that for raw vegetable feeds. There is a tendency for Salmonella to be less detected in raw feed components; however, in finished feeds Salmonella detectability has remained unchanged for decades. The Salmonella prevalence in samples taken from environmental objects and surfaces of feed mill production equipment was 0.08. The risk of Salmonella detection at feed mills in the pre-heat treatment zone was 1.5 times higher than the risk of detection in the post-heat treatment zone. The analysis of Salmonella serovariants revealed that S. senftenberg, S. montevideo, S. typhimurium, S. anatum, S. havana, S. enteritidis, S. cerro are isolated everywhere. The S. salford serotype is found only on the African continent. A research into antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolates demonstrated resistance to such medicinalproducts as ceftriaxone, carbopenem and imipenem; and full genome sequencing showed at least one antibiotic resistance gene in 40% of Salmonella isolates detected at pig feed production plants.https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/672reviewsalmonellafarm animal feedsalmonella prevalenceantimicrobial resistance
spellingShingle N. B. Shadrova
O. V. Pruntova
G. S. Skitovich
О. А. Akulich
<i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review
Ветеринария сегодня
review
salmonella
farm animal feed
salmonella prevalence
antimicrobial resistance
title <i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review
title_full <i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review
title_fullStr <i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review
title_full_unstemmed <i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review
title_short <i>Salmonella</i> bacteria in farm animal feeds. Review
title_sort i salmonella i bacteria in farm animal feeds review
topic review
salmonella
farm animal feed
salmonella prevalence
antimicrobial resistance
url https://veterinary.arriah.ru/jour/article/view/672
work_keys_str_mv AT nbshadrova isalmonellaibacteriainfarmanimalfeedsreview
AT ovpruntova isalmonellaibacteriainfarmanimalfeedsreview
AT gsskitovich isalmonellaibacteriainfarmanimalfeedsreview
AT oaakulich isalmonellaibacteriainfarmanimalfeedsreview