The Chinese Version of the DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) Instrument for Assessing Digital Health Competence of Health Care Professionals: Translation, Adaptation, and Validation Study
Abstract BackgroundDigital health competence is increasingly recognized as a core competence for health care professionals. A comprehensive evaluation of knowledge, skills, performance, values, and attitudes necessary to adapt to evolving digital health technologies is essenti...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2025-03-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Human Factors |
| Online Access: | https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2025/1/e65373 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | Abstract
BackgroundDigital health competence is increasingly recognized as a core competence for health care professionals. A comprehensive evaluation of knowledge, skills, performance, values, and attitudes necessary to adapt to evolving digital health technologies is essential. DigiHealthCom (Digital Health Competence) is a well-established instrument designed to assess digital health competence across diverse health care professionals.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to translate and culturally adapt DigiHealthCom into simplified Chinese (Mandarin) and verify its reliability and validity in assessing digital health competence of Chinese health care professionals.
MethodsDigiHealthCom was translated into Chinese following the guideline proposed by its original developers. The cultural adaptation involved expert review and cognitive interviewing. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and factor structure were examined. Item analysis tested item discrimination, item correlation, and item homogeneity. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach α, and test-retest reliability was measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Content validity was assessed through both item and scale content validity indices. Convergent validity was measured by the Average Variance Extracted and Composite Reliability, while discriminant validity was measured by the heterotrait-monotrait ratio. A five-dimension model of DigiHealthCom was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis.
ResultsThe finalized Chinese version of the DigiHealthCom was completed after addressing differences between the back-translations and the original version. No discrepancies affecting item clarity were reported during cognitive interviewing. The validation process involved 398 eligible health care professionals from 36 cities across 15 provinces in China, with 43 participants undergoing a retest after a 2-week interval. Critical ratio values (range 16.05‐23.77, P
ConclusionsThe Chinese version of DigiHealthCom has been proved to be reliable and valid. It is now available for assessing digital health competence among Chinese health care professionals. This assessment can be used to guide health care policy makers and educators in designing comprehensive and implementable educational programs and interventions. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2292-9495 |