The cognitive motivation and purposes of playful blending in English

The motivation of playful blending is circumscribed by the combination of source words with a recognized linguistic similarity (either semantic or morphological), or an oxymoronic effect. Interlocutors may then remotivate the consonant clusters of these forms, if they associate semantic features to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Boris Lefilliâtre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO 2020-01-01
Series:Corela
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/corela/9518
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The motivation of playful blending is circumscribed by the combination of source words with a recognized linguistic similarity (either semantic or morphological), or an oxymoronic effect. Interlocutors may then remotivate the consonant clusters of these forms, if they associate semantic features to them so as to coin other blends.The use of playful blending is aimed at reinforcing cognitive salience (a heightened attention is needed to read the output form). The output form therefore stands out from its environing text of monomorphemic lexemes, derivatives and unclipped compounds. It changes the way one focuses on a referent, either by emphasizing a lexeme which is given high attention, or minimizing its impact on the audience who has to reconstitute the possibly unpleasant source words mentally. This main approach unveils a tree of possible purposes (illustrated with representative samples of data), among which are humour, commercial attractiveness, witticisms to defend an idea, literary aestheticism, euphemism, dysphemism, or idiosyncrasy to be creative or express one’s individuality.Coreferential forms inside and outside playful blending are examined in corpus-based tools, which demonstrates that purpose is utterance-based (i.e. purely pragmatic). Utterances of the same playfully blended forms are analysed in various situations, which proves that while motivation is usage-based and situated on the semantic-pragmatic interface. However, pragmatics sometimes has to take over semantics’ limits to shed light on the motivation of a blend, since the form may remain ambiguous.
ISSN:1638-573X