Maintaining the integrity of the scientific record: corrections and best practices at The Lancet group
A transparent corrections process is essential to assist in the maintenance of public confidence in scientific and medical research. In the era of preprints, fast-paced peer review, and early-access publication, errors and oversights from both authors and editors might be more common. The swift and...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Ashley N Cooper, Jessica E Dwyer |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Association of Science Editors
2021-02-01
|
| Series: | European Science Editing |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ese.arphahub.com/article/62065/download/pdf/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Place of Error Correction in English Language Teaching
by: Ali Akbar Khansir, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01) -
Error Correction for Check Digit Systems over p-Groups and Applications to DNA Sequences
by: Louis Beaugris
Published: (2025-01-01) -
“Non-Markovian” and “directional” errors inhibit scientific self-correction and can lead fields of study astray: an illustration using gardening and obesity-related outcomes
by: Jon Agley, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01) -
The effects of corrective feedback on Iranian EFL students' writing
by: Amir Rezaei, et al.
Published: (2016-03-01) -
THE TEACHERS’ TECHNIQUES IN PROVIDING CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK ON STUDENTS’ PRONUNCIATION ERROR
by: Khairil Razali, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)