The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law

The rulemaking function of the executive branch of government is a fact of life in modern democratic states. In terms of development, the importance of secondary legislation is growing in both the quantitative and qualitative sense. Because it represents a deviation from the principle of the separat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iztok Rakar
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani) 2011-10-01
Series:Central European Public Administration Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20343
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832591554819129344
author Iztok Rakar
author_facet Iztok Rakar
author_sort Iztok Rakar
collection DOAJ
description The rulemaking function of the executive branch of government is a fact of life in modern democratic states. In terms of development, the importance of secondary legislation is growing in both the quantitative and qualitative sense. Because it represents a deviation from the principle of the separation of powers, secondary legislation receives a great deal of attention in both theory and case law. From a comparative standpoint, one can note a wide range of approaches to this question. It could be said that the American approach is pragmatic and flexible, while the Slovenian approach is dogmatic and rigid. In the former, the delegation of rulemaking authority to the executive branch is not problematic provided adequate mechanisms for legal and political oversight are in place; of these mechanisms, special emphasis is placed on the procedure for shaping secondary legislation and the public’s participation therein. In the latter, the executive branch is still always looked upon with distrust, which is why this approach persists in delegating as narrow and substantively precise powers as possible to the executive branch. Although the main burden of the democratic legitimization of the executive branch is still borne by the law, the importance of the procedure for shaping secondary legislation, and within its framework the possibilities for public participation, has been increasing.
format Article
id doaj-art-ec70305789ae47e7be21da3fb3604fa0
institution Kabale University
issn 2591-2240
2591-2259
language English
publishDate 2011-10-01
publisher University of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)
record_format Article
series Central European Public Administration Review
spelling doaj-art-ec70305789ae47e7be21da3fb3604fa02025-01-22T10:55:17ZengUniversity of Ljubljana Press (Založba Univerze v Ljubljani)Central European Public Administration Review2591-22402591-22592011-10-019310.17573/cepar.v9i3.185The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case LawIztok RakarThe rulemaking function of the executive branch of government is a fact of life in modern democratic states. In terms of development, the importance of secondary legislation is growing in both the quantitative and qualitative sense. Because it represents a deviation from the principle of the separation of powers, secondary legislation receives a great deal of attention in both theory and case law. From a comparative standpoint, one can note a wide range of approaches to this question. It could be said that the American approach is pragmatic and flexible, while the Slovenian approach is dogmatic and rigid. In the former, the delegation of rulemaking authority to the executive branch is not problematic provided adequate mechanisms for legal and political oversight are in place; of these mechanisms, special emphasis is placed on the procedure for shaping secondary legislation and the public’s participation therein. In the latter, the executive branch is still always looked upon with distrust, which is why this approach persists in delegating as narrow and substantively precise powers as possible to the executive branch. Although the main burden of the democratic legitimization of the executive branch is still borne by the law, the importance of the procedure for shaping secondary legislation, and within its framework the possibilities for public participation, has been increasing.https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20343executive branch of governmentsecondary legislationprocedurepublic participationlegitimacy
spellingShingle Iztok Rakar
The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law
Central European Public Administration Review
executive branch of government
secondary legislation
procedure
public participation
legitimacy
title The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law
title_full The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law
title_fullStr The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law
title_full_unstemmed The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law
title_short The Rulemaking Authority of the Executive Branch of Government – An Analysis of Slovenian and American Theory, Legislation and Case Law
title_sort rulemaking authority of the executive branch of government an analysis of slovenian and american theory legislation and case law
topic executive branch of government
secondary legislation
procedure
public participation
legitimacy
url https://journals.uni-lj.si/CEPAR/article/view/20343
work_keys_str_mv AT iztokrakar therulemakingauthorityoftheexecutivebranchofgovernmentananalysisofslovenianandamericantheorylegislationandcaselaw
AT iztokrakar rulemakingauthorityoftheexecutivebranchofgovernmentananalysisofslovenianandamericantheorylegislationandcaselaw