A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma

Background. Multiple modalities have been used in the treatment of melasma with variable success. Niacinamide has anti-inflammatory properties and is able to decrease the transfer of melanosomes. Objective. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of topical niacinamide versus hydroquinone (HQ) in melasma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Josefina Navarrete-Solís, Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cázares, Bertha Torres-µlvarez, Cuauhtemoc Oros-Ovalle, Cornelia Fuentes-Ahumada, Francisco Javier González, Juan David Martínez-Ramírez, Benjamin Moncada
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2011-01-01
Series:Dermatology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/379173
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832556922782351360
author Josefina Navarrete-Solís
Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cázares
Bertha Torres-µlvarez
Cuauhtemoc Oros-Ovalle
Cornelia Fuentes-Ahumada
Francisco Javier González
Juan David Martínez-Ramírez
Benjamin Moncada
author_facet Josefina Navarrete-Solís
Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cázares
Bertha Torres-µlvarez
Cuauhtemoc Oros-Ovalle
Cornelia Fuentes-Ahumada
Francisco Javier González
Juan David Martínez-Ramírez
Benjamin Moncada
author_sort Josefina Navarrete-Solís
collection DOAJ
description Background. Multiple modalities have been used in the treatment of melasma with variable success. Niacinamide has anti-inflammatory properties and is able to decrease the transfer of melanosomes. Objective. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of topical niacinamide versus hydroquinone (HQ) in melasma patients. Patients and Methods. Twenty-seven melasma patients were randomized to receive for eight weeks 4% niacinamide cream on one side of the face, and 4% HQ cream on the other. Sunscreen was applied along the observation period. They were assessed by noninvasive techniques for the evaluation of skin color, as well as subjective scales and histological sections initially and after the treatment with niacinamide. Results. All patients showed pigment improvement with both treatments. Colorimetric measures did not show statistical differences between both sides. However, good to excellent improvement was observed with niacinamide in 44% of patients, compared to 55% with HQ. Niacinamide reduced importantly the mast cell infiltrate and showed improvement of solar elastosis in melasma skin. Side effects were present in 18% with niacinamide versus 29% with HQ. Conclusion. Niacinamide induces a decrease in pigmentation, inflammatory infiltrate, and solar elastosis. Niacinamide is a safe and effective therapeutic agent for this condition.
format Article
id doaj-art-e97a19d4f56c4a5c97a6f6ea3889fa2d
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6105
1687-6113
language English
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Dermatology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-e97a19d4f56c4a5c97a6f6ea3889fa2d2025-02-03T05:44:10ZengWileyDermatology Research and Practice1687-61051687-61132011-01-01201110.1155/2011/379173379173A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of MelasmaJosefina Navarrete-Solís0Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cázares1Bertha Torres-µlvarez2Cuauhtemoc Oros-Ovalle3Cornelia Fuentes-Ahumada4Francisco Javier González5Juan David Martínez-Ramírez6Benjamin Moncada7Department of Dermatology, Hospital Central, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, MexicoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Central, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, MexicoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Central, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, MexicoDepartment of Pathology, Hospital Central, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, SLP, MexicoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Central, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, MexicoCoordinación para la Innovación y la Aplicación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, SLP, MexicoCoordinación para la Innovación y la Aplicación de la Ciencia y la Tecnología, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, SLP, MexicoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Central, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, San Luis Potosí, MexicoBackground. Multiple modalities have been used in the treatment of melasma with variable success. Niacinamide has anti-inflammatory properties and is able to decrease the transfer of melanosomes. Objective. To evaluate the therapeutic effect of topical niacinamide versus hydroquinone (HQ) in melasma patients. Patients and Methods. Twenty-seven melasma patients were randomized to receive for eight weeks 4% niacinamide cream on one side of the face, and 4% HQ cream on the other. Sunscreen was applied along the observation period. They were assessed by noninvasive techniques for the evaluation of skin color, as well as subjective scales and histological sections initially and after the treatment with niacinamide. Results. All patients showed pigment improvement with both treatments. Colorimetric measures did not show statistical differences between both sides. However, good to excellent improvement was observed with niacinamide in 44% of patients, compared to 55% with HQ. Niacinamide reduced importantly the mast cell infiltrate and showed improvement of solar elastosis in melasma skin. Side effects were present in 18% with niacinamide versus 29% with HQ. Conclusion. Niacinamide induces a decrease in pigmentation, inflammatory infiltrate, and solar elastosis. Niacinamide is a safe and effective therapeutic agent for this condition.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/379173
spellingShingle Josefina Navarrete-Solís
Juan Pablo Castanedo-Cázares
Bertha Torres-µlvarez
Cuauhtemoc Oros-Ovalle
Cornelia Fuentes-Ahumada
Francisco Javier González
Juan David Martínez-Ramírez
Benjamin Moncada
A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma
Dermatology Research and Practice
title A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma
title_full A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma
title_fullStr A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma
title_full_unstemmed A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma
title_short A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial of Niacinamide 4% versus Hydroquinone 4% in the Treatment of Melasma
title_sort double blind randomized clinical trial of niacinamide 4 versus hydroquinone 4 in the treatment of melasma
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/379173
work_keys_str_mv AT josefinanavarretesolis adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT juanpablocastanedocazares adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT berthatorresμlvarez adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT cuauhtemocorosovalle adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT corneliafuentesahumada adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT franciscojaviergonzalez adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT juandavidmartinezramirez adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT benjaminmoncada adoubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT josefinanavarretesolis doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT juanpablocastanedocazares doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT berthatorresμlvarez doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT cuauhtemocorosovalle doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT corneliafuentesahumada doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT franciscojaviergonzalez doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT juandavidmartinezramirez doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma
AT benjaminmoncada doubleblindrandomizedclinicaltrialofniacinamide4versushydroquinone4inthetreatmentofmelasma