Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2

From 1998, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted a new Celestial Reference System: the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). The first optical materialization was the Hipparcos catalogue, defining the Hipparcos Celestial Reference Frame (HCRF). The compilation of subsequent r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: María José Martínez Usó, Francisco J. Marco Castillo, José Antonio López Ortí
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2014-01-01
Series:Abstract and Applied Analysis
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/917583
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832559869445537792
author María José Martínez Usó
Francisco J. Marco Castillo
José Antonio López Ortí
author_facet María José Martínez Usó
Francisco J. Marco Castillo
José Antonio López Ortí
author_sort María José Martínez Usó
collection DOAJ
description From 1998, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted a new Celestial Reference System: the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). The first optical materialization was the Hipparcos catalogue, defining the Hipparcos Celestial Reference Frame (HCRF). The compilation of subsequent radio sources catalogues culminated in the current representation of the ICRF, the ICRF2 catalogue that is not sufficiently dense to cover all astrometrical purposes. Linking Hipparcos and ICRF2 is essential to uniformize the reference regardless of whether it is visible (HCRF) or not (ICRF). Many working groups provide their own complementary catalogs, some of whose sources are also in the ICRF2, with different reduction processes for positions. The point is that they provide information in more than one reference for a small number of objects. Some of these projects have been used by us to study the Hipparcos-ICRF2 differences: a certain number of couples of catalogs can be interrelated using a set of parameters. With these couples, we build a closed cycle with the same ending and departure couple. The parameters obtained from each couple affect the next; thus we have an iterative process whose fixed point is the solution that stabilizes it, providing a preliminary link for Hipparcos-ICRF2.
format Article
id doaj-art-e66eb460d4d144fe938f31a016ffed0c
institution Kabale University
issn 1085-3375
1687-0409
language English
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Abstract and Applied Analysis
spelling doaj-art-e66eb460d4d144fe938f31a016ffed0c2025-02-03T01:29:11ZengWileyAbstract and Applied Analysis1085-33751687-04092014-01-01201410.1155/2014/917583917583Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2María José Martínez Usó0Francisco J. Marco Castillo1José Antonio López Ortí2Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, IUMPA, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 46022 Valencia, SpainDepartamento de Matemáticas, IMAC, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, SpainDepartamento de Matemáticas, IMAC, Universitat Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, SpainFrom 1998, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) adopted a new Celestial Reference System: the International Celestial Reference System (ICRS). The first optical materialization was the Hipparcos catalogue, defining the Hipparcos Celestial Reference Frame (HCRF). The compilation of subsequent radio sources catalogues culminated in the current representation of the ICRF, the ICRF2 catalogue that is not sufficiently dense to cover all astrometrical purposes. Linking Hipparcos and ICRF2 is essential to uniformize the reference regardless of whether it is visible (HCRF) or not (ICRF). Many working groups provide their own complementary catalogs, some of whose sources are also in the ICRF2, with different reduction processes for positions. The point is that they provide information in more than one reference for a small number of objects. Some of these projects have been used by us to study the Hipparcos-ICRF2 differences: a certain number of couples of catalogs can be interrelated using a set of parameters. With these couples, we build a closed cycle with the same ending and departure couple. The parameters obtained from each couple affect the next; thus we have an iterative process whose fixed point is the solution that stabilizes it, providing a preliminary link for Hipparcos-ICRF2.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/917583
spellingShingle María José Martínez Usó
Francisco J. Marco Castillo
José Antonio López Ortí
Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2
Abstract and Applied Analysis
title Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2
title_full Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2
title_fullStr Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2
title_full_unstemmed Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2
title_short Fixed Point Method to Analyze Differences between Hipparcos and ICRF2
title_sort fixed point method to analyze differences between hipparcos and icrf2
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/917583
work_keys_str_mv AT mariajosemartinezuso fixedpointmethodtoanalyzedifferencesbetweenhipparcosandicrf2
AT franciscojmarcocastillo fixedpointmethodtoanalyzedifferencesbetweenhipparcosandicrf2
AT joseantoniolopezorti fixedpointmethodtoanalyzedifferencesbetweenhipparcosandicrf2