Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics

Telemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the org...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Todd Molfenter, Roger Brown, Andrew O’Neill, Ed Kopetsky, Alexander Toy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3932643
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832560005067309056
author Todd Molfenter
Roger Brown
Andrew O’Neill
Ed Kopetsky
Alexander Toy
author_facet Todd Molfenter
Roger Brown
Andrew O’Neill
Ed Kopetsky
Alexander Toy
author_sort Todd Molfenter
collection DOAJ
description Telemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the organizations expressed high rates of interest in seven of the telemedicine applications, demonstrating the appeal of telemedicine within this field. The top three self-reported telemedicine applications being used were (1) computerized screening/assessments (44.6%), (2) telephone-based recovery supports (29.5%), and (3) telephone-based therapy (28.37%). The greatest gaps between interest and use were for (1) texting appointment reminders (55.2% differential), (2) mobile apps for posttreatment recovery (46.6% differential), and (3) recovery support chats (46.6% differential). A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) of the organizations’ telemedicine use behavior identified three groupings: “Innovators” that were using a range of technologies (n=27, 7.4%); “Technology Traditionalists” that limited their use to telephone, video, and web portal technologies (n=101, 27.8%); and “Low Tech” that had low overall technology use (n=235, 64.7%). Future studies should build on how telemedicine could be applied in SUD settings, organizational behaviors towards its adoption, and telemedicine’s effect on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-e23358941b304542b907f14d1c83582f
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6415
1687-6423
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
spelling doaj-art-e23358941b304542b907f14d1c83582f2025-02-03T01:28:41ZengWileyInternational Journal of Telemedicine and Applications1687-64151687-64232018-01-01201810.1155/2018/39326433932643Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation CharacteristicsTodd Molfenter0Roger Brown1Andrew O’Neill2Ed Kopetsky3Alexander Toy4Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USASchools of Nursing, Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 4187 Cooper Hall, 701 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USAStanford Children’s Hospital, 725 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USATelemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the organizations expressed high rates of interest in seven of the telemedicine applications, demonstrating the appeal of telemedicine within this field. The top three self-reported telemedicine applications being used were (1) computerized screening/assessments (44.6%), (2) telephone-based recovery supports (29.5%), and (3) telephone-based therapy (28.37%). The greatest gaps between interest and use were for (1) texting appointment reminders (55.2% differential), (2) mobile apps for posttreatment recovery (46.6% differential), and (3) recovery support chats (46.6% differential). A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) of the organizations’ telemedicine use behavior identified three groupings: “Innovators” that were using a range of technologies (n=27, 7.4%); “Technology Traditionalists” that limited their use to telephone, video, and web portal technologies (n=101, 27.8%); and “Low Tech” that had low overall technology use (n=235, 64.7%). Future studies should build on how telemedicine could be applied in SUD settings, organizational behaviors towards its adoption, and telemedicine’s effect on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3932643
spellingShingle Todd Molfenter
Roger Brown
Andrew O’Neill
Ed Kopetsky
Alexander Toy
Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications
title Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
title_full Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
title_fullStr Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
title_full_unstemmed Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
title_short Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
title_sort use of telemedicine in addiction treatment current practices and organizational implementation characteristics
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3932643
work_keys_str_mv AT toddmolfenter useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics
AT rogerbrown useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics
AT andrewoneill useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics
AT edkopetsky useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics
AT alexandertoy useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics