Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics
Telemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the org...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2018-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3932643 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832560005067309056 |
---|---|
author | Todd Molfenter Roger Brown Andrew O’Neill Ed Kopetsky Alexander Toy |
author_facet | Todd Molfenter Roger Brown Andrew O’Neill Ed Kopetsky Alexander Toy |
author_sort | Todd Molfenter |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Telemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the organizations expressed high rates of interest in seven of the telemedicine applications, demonstrating the appeal of telemedicine within this field. The top three self-reported telemedicine applications being used were (1) computerized screening/assessments (44.6%), (2) telephone-based recovery supports (29.5%), and (3) telephone-based therapy (28.37%). The greatest gaps between interest and use were for (1) texting appointment reminders (55.2% differential), (2) mobile apps for posttreatment recovery (46.6% differential), and (3) recovery support chats (46.6% differential). A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) of the organizations’ telemedicine use behavior identified three groupings: “Innovators” that were using a range of technologies (n=27, 7.4%); “Technology Traditionalists” that limited their use to telephone, video, and web portal technologies (n=101, 27.8%); and “Low Tech” that had low overall technology use (n=235, 64.7%). Future studies should build on how telemedicine could be applied in SUD settings, organizational behaviors towards its adoption, and telemedicine’s effect on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-e23358941b304542b907f14d1c83582f |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 1687-6415 1687-6423 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications |
spelling | doaj-art-e23358941b304542b907f14d1c83582f2025-02-03T01:28:41ZengWileyInternational Journal of Telemedicine and Applications1687-64151687-64232018-01-01201810.1155/2018/39326433932643Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation CharacteristicsTodd Molfenter0Roger Brown1Andrew O’Neill2Ed Kopetsky3Alexander Toy4Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USASchools of Nursing, Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 4187 Cooper Hall, 701 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USAStanford Children’s Hospital, 725 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USADepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI 53706, USATelemedicine applications offer innovative approaches for treating and reducing the effects of substance use disorders (SUDs). This analysis assessed the interest in and use of 11 telemedicine applications in a sample of 363 SUD organizations in the United States of America. Fifty percent of the organizations expressed high rates of interest in seven of the telemedicine applications, demonstrating the appeal of telemedicine within this field. The top three self-reported telemedicine applications being used were (1) computerized screening/assessments (44.6%), (2) telephone-based recovery supports (29.5%), and (3) telephone-based therapy (28.37%). The greatest gaps between interest and use were for (1) texting appointment reminders (55.2% differential), (2) mobile apps for posttreatment recovery (46.6% differential), and (3) recovery support chats (46.6% differential). A Latent Class Analysis (LCA) of the organizations’ telemedicine use behavior identified three groupings: “Innovators” that were using a range of technologies (n=27, 7.4%); “Technology Traditionalists” that limited their use to telephone, video, and web portal technologies (n=101, 27.8%); and “Low Tech” that had low overall technology use (n=235, 64.7%). Future studies should build on how telemedicine could be applied in SUD settings, organizational behaviors towards its adoption, and telemedicine’s effect on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3932643 |
spellingShingle | Todd Molfenter Roger Brown Andrew O’Neill Ed Kopetsky Alexander Toy Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications |
title | Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics |
title_full | Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics |
title_fullStr | Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics |
title_full_unstemmed | Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics |
title_short | Use of Telemedicine in Addiction Treatment: Current Practices and Organizational Implementation Characteristics |
title_sort | use of telemedicine in addiction treatment current practices and organizational implementation characteristics |
url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/3932643 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT toddmolfenter useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics AT rogerbrown useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics AT andrewoneill useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics AT edkopetsky useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics AT alexandertoy useoftelemedicineinaddictiontreatmentcurrentpracticesandorganizationalimplementationcharacteristics |