The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education
For democracy to thrive, citizens must be engaged participants. Higher education must foster the growth of citizens through experience. This will enable undergraduates to develop their individual Civic Identities, whereby they see themselves as “active participants in society with a strong commitmen...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Michigan Publishing
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/mjcsl/article/id/5133/ |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1850066811862646784 |
|---|---|
| author | Annie Jonas Brooke Millsaps Langdon J. Martin |
| author_facet | Annie Jonas Brooke Millsaps Langdon J. Martin |
| author_sort | Annie Jonas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | For democracy to thrive, citizens must be engaged participants. Higher education must foster the growth of citizens through experience. This will enable undergraduates to develop their individual Civic Identities, whereby they see themselves as “active participants in society with a strong commitment and responsibility to work with others towards public purposes,” as defined by the AAC&U.;
In A Framework for Understanding Student Engagement and Outcomes, Schnaubelt et al. ask whether it’s important to have a definition of civic identity, and what that definition might be. These questions are similar to questions our campus has been discussing for many years. The answer we have found is that, paradoxically, while a clear definition is important, the specific term (i.e. “civic identity”) does not need to be explicitly in that definition.
Herein, we describe the multi-year, democratic process of creating and supporting an across-campus movement to centralize civic identity development into a higher education curriculum. The work was framed through a new model that provided specific developmental stages for students. Through this model, students and campus educators better understood and embraced college-wide civic learning outcomes that embrace the Building Blocks One and Two described by Schnaubelt: Capacity to engage constructively across differences and Democratic knowledge and skills.
This ongoing work has been successful precisely because we engaged constructively in a democratic process of generating buy-in across campus. For example, we found that the term “civic identity” did not resonate on our campus as an outcome per se. Instead, it became a lens to focus discussion: What does civic identity mean in the context of our ethos? At our institution, it means “fostering a just, equitable, and sustainable world.” Our work gave rise to an update to the college’s Mission Statement, revisions to General Education requirements, and a common writing prompt across First-Year Seminars.
We have also begun using our model for assessment: How do we measure a student’s capacity to engage across differences, and their development of democratic knowledge, habit, and skills? With foundational pieces built into First-Year Seminars, all incoming students engaged with civic learning in their first semester, and the common writing prompt became a useful tool for assessment. Annual retreats dedicated to evaluation of the student responses to this prompt became an ongoing opportunity to discuss and maintain buy-in, as well as a place to understand how students are developing their civic identities; we present data collected over four years of this work. This article provides a map as well as lessons learned to support other colleges’ work to live into the call from A Crucible Moment (2012) to make civic learning an integral part of a college education. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e14e2f5db8bd4dfbb2b91cae0431bb5b |
| institution | DOAJ |
| issn | 1944-0219 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Michigan Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning |
| spelling | doaj-art-e14e2f5db8bd4dfbb2b91cae0431bb5b2025-08-20T02:48:38ZengMichigan PublishingMichigan Journal of Community Service Learning1944-02192023-12-0129210.3998/mjcsl.5133The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate EducationAnnie Jonas0Brooke Millsaps1Langdon J. Martin2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3154-5081Education, Warren Wilson CollegeWarren Wilson CollegeChemistry, Warren Wilson CollegeFor democracy to thrive, citizens must be engaged participants. Higher education must foster the growth of citizens through experience. This will enable undergraduates to develop their individual Civic Identities, whereby they see themselves as “active participants in society with a strong commitment and responsibility to work with others towards public purposes,” as defined by the AAC&U.; In A Framework for Understanding Student Engagement and Outcomes, Schnaubelt et al. ask whether it’s important to have a definition of civic identity, and what that definition might be. These questions are similar to questions our campus has been discussing for many years. The answer we have found is that, paradoxically, while a clear definition is important, the specific term (i.e. “civic identity”) does not need to be explicitly in that definition. Herein, we describe the multi-year, democratic process of creating and supporting an across-campus movement to centralize civic identity development into a higher education curriculum. The work was framed through a new model that provided specific developmental stages for students. Through this model, students and campus educators better understood and embraced college-wide civic learning outcomes that embrace the Building Blocks One and Two described by Schnaubelt: Capacity to engage constructively across differences and Democratic knowledge and skills. This ongoing work has been successful precisely because we engaged constructively in a democratic process of generating buy-in across campus. For example, we found that the term “civic identity” did not resonate on our campus as an outcome per se. Instead, it became a lens to focus discussion: What does civic identity mean in the context of our ethos? At our institution, it means “fostering a just, equitable, and sustainable world.” Our work gave rise to an update to the college’s Mission Statement, revisions to General Education requirements, and a common writing prompt across First-Year Seminars. We have also begun using our model for assessment: How do we measure a student’s capacity to engage across differences, and their development of democratic knowledge, habit, and skills? With foundational pieces built into First-Year Seminars, all incoming students engaged with civic learning in their first semester, and the common writing prompt became a useful tool for assessment. Annual retreats dedicated to evaluation of the student responses to this prompt became an ongoing opportunity to discuss and maintain buy-in, as well as a place to understand how students are developing their civic identities; we present data collected over four years of this work. This article provides a map as well as lessons learned to support other colleges’ work to live into the call from A Crucible Moment (2012) to make civic learning an integral part of a college education.https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/mjcsl/article/id/5133/Civic identity developmentcivic identity assesmentmission statement revision |
| spellingShingle | Annie Jonas Brooke Millsaps Langdon J. Martin The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning Civic identity development civic identity assesment mission statement revision |
| title | The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education |
| title_full | The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education |
| title_fullStr | The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education |
| title_short | The Lens of Civic Identity: A Developmental Model for Undergraduate Education |
| title_sort | lens of civic identity a developmental model for undergraduate education |
| topic | Civic identity development civic identity assesment mission statement revision |
| url | https://journals.publishing.umich.edu/mjcsl/article/id/5133/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT anniejonas thelensofcivicidentityadevelopmentalmodelforundergraduateeducation AT brookemillsaps thelensofcivicidentityadevelopmentalmodelforundergraduateeducation AT langdonjmartin thelensofcivicidentityadevelopmentalmodelforundergraduateeducation AT anniejonas lensofcivicidentityadevelopmentalmodelforundergraduateeducation AT brookemillsaps lensofcivicidentityadevelopmentalmodelforundergraduateeducation AT langdonjmartin lensofcivicidentityadevelopmentalmodelforundergraduateeducation |