A Systematic Review of Empirical Research on Payment of Ecosystem Services and Farm Household Income in China
The payment for ecosystem services (PES) scheme shows great poverty alleviation potential and recognizing this connection contributes to enhancing the development of residents in ecologically endowed areas. However, the literature has not clarified the extent of the promotion and moderating factors...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Bohao Jin, Heming Wang |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2024-11-01
|
| Series: | SAGE Open |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241301426 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
How Farm Machinery Rental Services and Off-Farm Work Affect Household Income in China
by: Weiwei Wang, et al.
Published: (2024-09-01) -
The impact of digital payments on the financial vulnerability of rural households: empirical evidence from China
by: Fan Xu, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01) -
Do transfer payments affect food loss in rural household? Empirical evidence from China
by: Xiaoxiao Li, et al.
Published: (2025-08-01) -
Impact of farm size on the function of landscape-level payments for ecosystem services: an agent-based model study
by: Vince Wu, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
How Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Shapes Perception of Ecosystem Services and Conservation Willingness
by: Zhenglin Qiao, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)