Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM

The maximum fuel temperature under accident condition is the most important parameter of inherently safe characteristics of HTR-PM, and the DLOFC accident may lead to a peak accident fuel temperature. And there are a variety of uncertainty sources in the maximum fuel temperature calculations, and th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Hao, Peijun Li, Ding She, Xiaoyu Zhou, Rongrui Yang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9235783
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832567971025780736
author Chen Hao
Peijun Li
Ding She
Xiaoyu Zhou
Rongrui Yang
author_facet Chen Hao
Peijun Li
Ding She
Xiaoyu Zhou
Rongrui Yang
author_sort Chen Hao
collection DOAJ
description The maximum fuel temperature under accident condition is the most important parameter of inherently safe characteristics of HTR-PM, and the DLOFC accident may lead to a peak accident fuel temperature. And there are a variety of uncertainty sources in the maximum fuel temperature calculations, and thus the contributions of these uncertainty sources to the final calculated maximum fuel temperature should be quantified to check whether the peak value exceed the technological limit of 1620°C or not. Eight uncertainty input parameters are selected for inclusion in this uncertainty study, and their associated 2 standard deviation uncertainties and probability density functions are specified. Then, the DLOFC thermal analyses and uncertainty analysis are performed with the home-developed ATHENA and CUSA. The numerical results indicate that the pebble-bed effective conductivity and the decay heat contribute the most of the uncertainty in the DLOFC maximum fuel temperature while this peak fuel temperature is most sensitive to the initial reactor power and the decay heat. In short, uncertainties in these selected eight parameters lead to the two standard deviation (2σ) uncertainty of ±77.6°C (or 5.2%) around the mean value of 1493°C for the maximum fuel temperature under DLOFC accident of HTR-PM. At the same time, the LHS-SVDC method of CUSA is recommended to propagate uncertainties in inputs and 100–200 model simulations seem to be sufficient to get an uncertainty prediction with full confidence.
format Article
id doaj-art-dbb1fcb7f65043898c8db924348ef122
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6075
1687-6083
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
spelling doaj-art-dbb1fcb7f65043898c8db924348ef1222025-02-03T01:00:07ZengWileyScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations1687-60751687-60832020-01-01202010.1155/2020/92357839235783Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PMChen Hao0Peijun Li1Ding She2Xiaoyu Zhou3Rongrui Yang4Fundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, ChinaFundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, ChinaInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET), Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, ChinaFundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, ChinaFundamental Science on Nuclear Safety and Simulation Technology Laboratory, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, ChinaThe maximum fuel temperature under accident condition is the most important parameter of inherently safe characteristics of HTR-PM, and the DLOFC accident may lead to a peak accident fuel temperature. And there are a variety of uncertainty sources in the maximum fuel temperature calculations, and thus the contributions of these uncertainty sources to the final calculated maximum fuel temperature should be quantified to check whether the peak value exceed the technological limit of 1620°C or not. Eight uncertainty input parameters are selected for inclusion in this uncertainty study, and their associated 2 standard deviation uncertainties and probability density functions are specified. Then, the DLOFC thermal analyses and uncertainty analysis are performed with the home-developed ATHENA and CUSA. The numerical results indicate that the pebble-bed effective conductivity and the decay heat contribute the most of the uncertainty in the DLOFC maximum fuel temperature while this peak fuel temperature is most sensitive to the initial reactor power and the decay heat. In short, uncertainties in these selected eight parameters lead to the two standard deviation (2σ) uncertainty of ±77.6°C (or 5.2%) around the mean value of 1493°C for the maximum fuel temperature under DLOFC accident of HTR-PM. At the same time, the LHS-SVDC method of CUSA is recommended to propagate uncertainties in inputs and 100–200 model simulations seem to be sufficient to get an uncertainty prediction with full confidence.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9235783
spellingShingle Chen Hao
Peijun Li
Ding She
Xiaoyu Zhou
Rongrui Yang
Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM
Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations
title Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM
title_full Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM
title_fullStr Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM
title_short Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analysis of the Maximum Fuel Temperature under Accident Condition of HTR-PM
title_sort sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the maximum fuel temperature under accident condition of htr pm
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/9235783
work_keys_str_mv AT chenhao sensitivityanduncertaintyanalysisofthemaximumfueltemperatureunderaccidentconditionofhtrpm
AT peijunli sensitivityanduncertaintyanalysisofthemaximumfueltemperatureunderaccidentconditionofhtrpm
AT dingshe sensitivityanduncertaintyanalysisofthemaximumfueltemperatureunderaccidentconditionofhtrpm
AT xiaoyuzhou sensitivityanduncertaintyanalysisofthemaximumfueltemperatureunderaccidentconditionofhtrpm
AT rongruiyang sensitivityanduncertaintyanalysisofthemaximumfueltemperatureunderaccidentconditionofhtrpm