Comparing In-Person and Remote Qualitative Data Collection Methods for Data Quality and Inclusion: A Scoping Review
Background: In-person data collection has long been considered the ‘gold standard’ for qualitative data collection. Societal changes and the rapid increase in the use of remote methods during the Covid-19 pandemic intensified debate about the limitations and opportunities of remote data collection,...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | Julie Roberts, Chinwe Onuegbu, Bronwyn Harris, Corinna Clark, Frances Griffiths, Kate Seers, Puren Aktas, Sophie Staniszewska, Felicity Boardman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2025-01-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Qualitative Methods |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251316745 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Systematic review of educational interventions to improve the menstrual health of young adolescent girls
by: Frances Griffiths, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01) -
A systematic review of passive data for remote monitoring in psychosis and schizophrenia
by: Siân Bladon, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01) -
Enhancing Vehicular Network Efficiency: The Impact of Object Data Inclusion in the Collective Perception Service
by: Andreia Figueiredo, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Landslide susceptibility assessment in scarce-data regions using remote sensing data
by: Edier Vicente Aristizábal-Giraldo, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
Towards Dynamic Remote Data Auditing in Computational Clouds
by: Mehdi Sookhak, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)