Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?

ABSTRACT Background and Aims Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high‐definition anorectal manometry (3D‐HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost‐effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Philippe Onana Ndong, Karine Baumstarck, Véronique Vitton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2025-01-01
Series:JGH Open
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70097
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583621674795008
author Philippe Onana Ndong
Karine Baumstarck
Véronique Vitton
author_facet Philippe Onana Ndong
Karine Baumstarck
Véronique Vitton
author_sort Philippe Onana Ndong
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Background and Aims Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high‐definition anorectal manometry (3D‐HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost‐effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This study aimed to assess DRE's capability to classify DD patients into the four subtypes outlined in Rao's classification. Methods This retrospective monocentric study involved patients diagnosed with DD through 3D‐HRAM. After initial 3D‐HRAM performed by one physician, patients underwent a clinical examination, including DRE by a second senior clinician blinded to DD subtypes. Statistical tests measured the correlation between DRE and HRAM in classifying the four DD subtypes. Results The study included 200 patients, revealing commendable overall agreement between DRE and 3D‐HRAM (Kappa = 0.658). For subtype diagnosis, correlation was substantial for Subtypes I, II, and IV (0.679, 0.741, 0.649, respectively) and moderate for Subtype III (Kappa = 0.325). Conclusion DRE demonstrates satisfactory performance in diagnosing the four subtypes of DD. Enhanced training in DRE, emphasizing functional information, has the potential to reduce reliance on additional tests, thereby mitigating economic and organizational impacts.
format Article
id doaj-art-d071ddcb7c2a4f839e913837a2ef043a
institution Kabale University
issn 2397-9070
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series JGH Open
spelling doaj-art-d071ddcb7c2a4f839e913837a2ef043a2025-01-28T09:24:32ZengWileyJGH Open2397-90702025-01-0191n/an/a10.1002/jgh3.70097Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?Philippe Onana Ndong0Karine Baumstarck1Véronique Vitton2Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital L'Archet 2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice Nice FranceService d'Epidémiologie et Economie en Santé, Direction de la Recherche en Santé AP‐HM Marseille FranceService de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital NORD, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille Aix‐Marseille Université Marseille FranceABSTRACT Background and Aims Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high‐definition anorectal manometry (3D‐HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost‐effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This study aimed to assess DRE's capability to classify DD patients into the four subtypes outlined in Rao's classification. Methods This retrospective monocentric study involved patients diagnosed with DD through 3D‐HRAM. After initial 3D‐HRAM performed by one physician, patients underwent a clinical examination, including DRE by a second senior clinician blinded to DD subtypes. Statistical tests measured the correlation between DRE and HRAM in classifying the four DD subtypes. Results The study included 200 patients, revealing commendable overall agreement between DRE and 3D‐HRAM (Kappa = 0.658). For subtype diagnosis, correlation was substantial for Subtypes I, II, and IV (0.679, 0.741, 0.649, respectively) and moderate for Subtype III (Kappa = 0.325). Conclusion DRE demonstrates satisfactory performance in diagnosing the four subtypes of DD. Enhanced training in DRE, emphasizing functional information, has the potential to reduce reliance on additional tests, thereby mitigating economic and organizational impacts.https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70097DREdyssynergic disordersHRAMsubtypes
spellingShingle Philippe Onana Ndong
Karine Baumstarck
Véronique Vitton
Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
JGH Open
DRE
dyssynergic disorders
HRAM
subtypes
title Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
title_full Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
title_fullStr Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
title_full_unstemmed Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
title_short Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
title_sort can digital rectal examination identify the subtype of dyssynergic disorders as well as high resolution anorectal manometry
topic DRE
dyssynergic disorders
HRAM
subtypes
url https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70097
work_keys_str_mv AT philippeonanandong candigitalrectalexaminationidentifythesubtypeofdyssynergicdisordersaswellashighresolutionanorectalmanometry
AT karinebaumstarck candigitalrectalexaminationidentifythesubtypeofdyssynergicdisordersaswellashighresolutionanorectalmanometry
AT veroniquevitton candigitalrectalexaminationidentifythesubtypeofdyssynergicdisordersaswellashighresolutionanorectalmanometry