Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?
ABSTRACT Background and Aims Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high‐definition anorectal manometry (3D‐HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost‐effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This s...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2025-01-01
|
Series: | JGH Open |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70097 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
_version_ | 1832583621674795008 |
---|---|
author | Philippe Onana Ndong Karine Baumstarck Véronique Vitton |
author_facet | Philippe Onana Ndong Karine Baumstarck Véronique Vitton |
author_sort | Philippe Onana Ndong |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ABSTRACT Background and Aims Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high‐definition anorectal manometry (3D‐HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost‐effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This study aimed to assess DRE's capability to classify DD patients into the four subtypes outlined in Rao's classification. Methods This retrospective monocentric study involved patients diagnosed with DD through 3D‐HRAM. After initial 3D‐HRAM performed by one physician, patients underwent a clinical examination, including DRE by a second senior clinician blinded to DD subtypes. Statistical tests measured the correlation between DRE and HRAM in classifying the four DD subtypes. Results The study included 200 patients, revealing commendable overall agreement between DRE and 3D‐HRAM (Kappa = 0.658). For subtype diagnosis, correlation was substantial for Subtypes I, II, and IV (0.679, 0.741, 0.649, respectively) and moderate for Subtype III (Kappa = 0.325). Conclusion DRE demonstrates satisfactory performance in diagnosing the four subtypes of DD. Enhanced training in DRE, emphasizing functional information, has the potential to reduce reliance on additional tests, thereby mitigating economic and organizational impacts. |
format | Article |
id | doaj-art-d071ddcb7c2a4f839e913837a2ef043a |
institution | Kabale University |
issn | 2397-9070 |
language | English |
publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | JGH Open |
spelling | doaj-art-d071ddcb7c2a4f839e913837a2ef043a2025-01-28T09:24:32ZengWileyJGH Open2397-90702025-01-0191n/an/a10.1002/jgh3.70097Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry?Philippe Onana Ndong0Karine Baumstarck1Véronique Vitton2Service de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital L'Archet 2 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice Nice FranceService d'Epidémiologie et Economie en Santé, Direction de la Recherche en Santé AP‐HM Marseille FranceService de Gastroentérologie, Hôpital NORD, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille Aix‐Marseille Université Marseille FranceABSTRACT Background and Aims Diagnosing dyssynergic disorders (DD) often requires 3D high‐definition anorectal manometry (3D‐HRAM), raising concerns about cost, availability, and delayed referral. Digital rectal examination (DRE) offers a reliable, cost‐effective alternative for DD diagnosis. This study aimed to assess DRE's capability to classify DD patients into the four subtypes outlined in Rao's classification. Methods This retrospective monocentric study involved patients diagnosed with DD through 3D‐HRAM. After initial 3D‐HRAM performed by one physician, patients underwent a clinical examination, including DRE by a second senior clinician blinded to DD subtypes. Statistical tests measured the correlation between DRE and HRAM in classifying the four DD subtypes. Results The study included 200 patients, revealing commendable overall agreement between DRE and 3D‐HRAM (Kappa = 0.658). For subtype diagnosis, correlation was substantial for Subtypes I, II, and IV (0.679, 0.741, 0.649, respectively) and moderate for Subtype III (Kappa = 0.325). Conclusion DRE demonstrates satisfactory performance in diagnosing the four subtypes of DD. Enhanced training in DRE, emphasizing functional information, has the potential to reduce reliance on additional tests, thereby mitigating economic and organizational impacts.https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70097DREdyssynergic disordersHRAMsubtypes |
spellingShingle | Philippe Onana Ndong Karine Baumstarck Véronique Vitton Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry? JGH Open DRE dyssynergic disorders HRAM subtypes |
title | Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry? |
title_full | Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry? |
title_fullStr | Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry? |
title_short | Can Digital Rectal Examination Identify the Subtype of Dyssynergic Disorders as Well as High Resolution Anorectal Manometry? |
title_sort | can digital rectal examination identify the subtype of dyssynergic disorders as well as high resolution anorectal manometry |
topic | DRE dyssynergic disorders HRAM subtypes |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT philippeonanandong candigitalrectalexaminationidentifythesubtypeofdyssynergicdisordersaswellashighresolutionanorectalmanometry AT karinebaumstarck candigitalrectalexaminationidentifythesubtypeofdyssynergicdisordersaswellashighresolutionanorectalmanometry AT veroniquevitton candigitalrectalexaminationidentifythesubtypeofdyssynergicdisordersaswellashighresolutionanorectalmanometry |