Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.

<h4>Objectives</h4>The COVID-19 pandemic placed health care personnel (HCP) at risk for stress, anxiety, burnout, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address this, hospitals developed programs to mitigate risk. The objectives of the current study were to measure the availabilit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karin F Hoth, Patrick Ten Eyck, Karisa K Harland, Anusha Krishnadasan, Robert M Rodriguez, Juan Carlos C Montoy, Linder H Wendt, William Mower, Kelli Wallace, Scott Santibañez, David A Talan, Nicholas M Mohr, Project COVERED Emergency Department Network
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2024-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298807&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832589940321419264
author Karin F Hoth
Patrick Ten Eyck
Karisa K Harland
Anusha Krishnadasan
Robert M Rodriguez
Juan Carlos C Montoy
Linder H Wendt
William Mower
Kelli Wallace
Scott Santibañez
David A Talan
Nicholas M Mohr
Project COVERED Emergency Department Network
author_facet Karin F Hoth
Patrick Ten Eyck
Karisa K Harland
Anusha Krishnadasan
Robert M Rodriguez
Juan Carlos C Montoy
Linder H Wendt
William Mower
Kelli Wallace
Scott Santibañez
David A Talan
Nicholas M Mohr
Project COVERED Emergency Department Network
author_sort Karin F Hoth
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>The COVID-19 pandemic placed health care personnel (HCP) at risk for stress, anxiety, burnout, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address this, hospitals developed programs to mitigate risk. The objectives of the current study were to measure the availability and use of these programs in a cohort of academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States early in the pandemic and identify factors associated with program use.<h4>Methods</h4>Cross-sectional survey of ED HCP in 21 academic EDs in 15 states between June and September 2020. Site investigators provided data on the availability of 28 programs grouped into 9 categories. Individual support programs included: financial, workload mitigation, individual COVID-19 testing, emotional (e.g., mental health hotline), and instrumental (e.g., childcare) Clinical work support programs included: COVID-19 team communication (e.g., debriefing critical incident), patient-family communication facilitation, patient services (e.g., social work, ethics consultation), and system-level exposure reduction. Participants provided corresponding data on whether they used the programs. We used generalized linear mixed models clustered on site to measure the association between demographic and facility characteristics and program use.<h4>Results</h4>We received 1,541 survey responses (96% response rate) from emergency physicians or advanced practice providers, nurses, and nonclinical staff. Program availability in each of the 9 categories was high (>95% of hospitals). Program use was variable, with clinical work support programs used more frequently (28-50% of eligible HCP across categories) than individual employee support programs (6-13% of eligible HCP across categories). Fifty-seven percent of respondents reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had affected their stress and anxiety, and 12% were at elevated risk for PTSD. Program use did not significantly differ for HCP who reported symptoms of anxiety and/or stress compared to those who did not.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Early in the pandemic, support programs were widely available to ED HCP, but program use was low. Future work will focus on identifying barriers and facilitators to use and specific programs most likely to be effective during periods of highest occupational stress.
format Article
id doaj-art-d063d4c29aae4d3e8fbea74c0fd89494
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-d063d4c29aae4d3e8fbea74c0fd894942025-01-24T05:31:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032024-01-01194e029880710.1371/journal.pone.0298807Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.Karin F HothPatrick Ten EyckKarisa K HarlandAnusha KrishnadasanRobert M RodriguezJuan Carlos C MontoyLinder H WendtWilliam MowerKelli WallaceScott SantibañezDavid A TalanNicholas M MohrProject COVERED Emergency Department Network<h4>Objectives</h4>The COVID-19 pandemic placed health care personnel (HCP) at risk for stress, anxiety, burnout, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). To address this, hospitals developed programs to mitigate risk. The objectives of the current study were to measure the availability and use of these programs in a cohort of academic emergency departments (EDs) in the United States early in the pandemic and identify factors associated with program use.<h4>Methods</h4>Cross-sectional survey of ED HCP in 21 academic EDs in 15 states between June and September 2020. Site investigators provided data on the availability of 28 programs grouped into 9 categories. Individual support programs included: financial, workload mitigation, individual COVID-19 testing, emotional (e.g., mental health hotline), and instrumental (e.g., childcare) Clinical work support programs included: COVID-19 team communication (e.g., debriefing critical incident), patient-family communication facilitation, patient services (e.g., social work, ethics consultation), and system-level exposure reduction. Participants provided corresponding data on whether they used the programs. We used generalized linear mixed models clustered on site to measure the association between demographic and facility characteristics and program use.<h4>Results</h4>We received 1,541 survey responses (96% response rate) from emergency physicians or advanced practice providers, nurses, and nonclinical staff. Program availability in each of the 9 categories was high (>95% of hospitals). Program use was variable, with clinical work support programs used more frequently (28-50% of eligible HCP across categories) than individual employee support programs (6-13% of eligible HCP across categories). Fifty-seven percent of respondents reported that the COVID-19 pandemic had affected their stress and anxiety, and 12% were at elevated risk for PTSD. Program use did not significantly differ for HCP who reported symptoms of anxiety and/or stress compared to those who did not.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Early in the pandemic, support programs were widely available to ED HCP, but program use was low. Future work will focus on identifying barriers and facilitators to use and specific programs most likely to be effective during periods of highest occupational stress.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298807&type=printable
spellingShingle Karin F Hoth
Patrick Ten Eyck
Karisa K Harland
Anusha Krishnadasan
Robert M Rodriguez
Juan Carlos C Montoy
Linder H Wendt
William Mower
Kelli Wallace
Scott Santibañez
David A Talan
Nicholas M Mohr
Project COVERED Emergency Department Network
Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
PLoS ONE
title Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_full Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_fullStr Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_full_unstemmed Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_short Availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
title_sort availability and use of institutional support programs for emergency department healthcare personnel during the covid 19 pandemic
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0298807&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT karinfhoth availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT patrickteneyck availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT karisakharland availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT anushakrishnadasan availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT robertmrodriguez availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT juancarloscmontoy availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT linderhwendt availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT williammower availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT kelliwallace availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT scottsantibanez availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT davidatalan availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT nicholasmmohr availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic
AT projectcoveredemergencydepartmentnetwork availabilityanduseofinstitutionalsupportprogramsforemergencydepartmenthealthcarepersonnelduringthecovid19pandemic