Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations
Objectives. This study was carried out to compare the ability of two common brands of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), including New Tom and Planmeca, to detect the marginal leakage of class V composite resins. The ability of each of the two brands of CBCT to detect the marginal leakage of clas...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | The Scientific World Journal |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688554 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832556918305980416 |
|---|---|
| author | Mitra Karbasi Kheir Leili Khayam |
| author_facet | Mitra Karbasi Kheir Leili Khayam |
| author_sort | Mitra Karbasi Kheir |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objectives. This study was carried out to compare the ability of two common brands of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), including New Tom and Planmeca, to detect the marginal leakage of class V composite resins. The ability of each of the two brands of CBCT to detect the marginal leakage of class V composite resins was also compared with that of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of sixteen extracted caries-free human premolars. Cavities were conditioned and filled with composite resin. The teeth were immersed in 50% weight/weight aqueous silver nitrate solution for 24 hours. They were then taken out and rinsed with distilled water. Next, they were put in a developing solution. They were first viewed with New Tom and Planmeca CBCT units and were then sectioned and evaluated by an SEM. Results. The results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed no significant difference between the mean marginal leakage scores of New Tom and Planmeca CBCT images (p value = 0.157) and between those of New Tom CBCT and SEM images (p value = 0.098). However, there was a significant difference between the mean marginal leakage scores of Planmeca CBCT and SEM images (p value = 0.023). Conclusion. There were no significant differences between New Tom and Planmeca CBCT units in the detection of marginal leakage of class V composite resins. However, when these CBCT units were compared with the SEM, the New Tom CBCT unit could detect the marginal leakage better than Planmeca. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-cf11b623e60343eaac88e7ac8696d46a |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2356-6140 1537-744X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | The Scientific World Journal |
| spelling | doaj-art-cf11b623e60343eaac88e7ac8696d46a2025-02-03T05:44:09ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal2356-61401537-744X2021-01-01202110.1155/2021/66885546688554Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin RestorationsMitra Karbasi Kheir0Leili Khayam1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Isfahan (Khorasgan), Isfahan, IranDepartment of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Tabriz, Tabriz, IranObjectives. This study was carried out to compare the ability of two common brands of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), including New Tom and Planmeca, to detect the marginal leakage of class V composite resins. The ability of each of the two brands of CBCT to detect the marginal leakage of class V composite resins was also compared with that of scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Methods. Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surface of sixteen extracted caries-free human premolars. Cavities were conditioned and filled with composite resin. The teeth were immersed in 50% weight/weight aqueous silver nitrate solution for 24 hours. They were then taken out and rinsed with distilled water. Next, they were put in a developing solution. They were first viewed with New Tom and Planmeca CBCT units and were then sectioned and evaluated by an SEM. Results. The results of the Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed no significant difference between the mean marginal leakage scores of New Tom and Planmeca CBCT images (p value = 0.157) and between those of New Tom CBCT and SEM images (p value = 0.098). However, there was a significant difference between the mean marginal leakage scores of Planmeca CBCT and SEM images (p value = 0.023). Conclusion. There were no significant differences between New Tom and Planmeca CBCT units in the detection of marginal leakage of class V composite resins. However, when these CBCT units were compared with the SEM, the New Tom CBCT unit could detect the marginal leakage better than Planmeca.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688554 |
| spellingShingle | Mitra Karbasi Kheir Leili Khayam Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations The Scientific World Journal |
| title | Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations |
| title_full | Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations |
| title_short | Comparison of the Ability of Two Brands of CBCT with That of SEM to Detect the Marginal Leakage of Class V Composite Resin Restorations |
| title_sort | comparison of the ability of two brands of cbct with that of sem to detect the marginal leakage of class v composite resin restorations |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6688554 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mitrakarbasikheir comparisonoftheabilityoftwobrandsofcbctwiththatofsemtodetectthemarginalleakageofclassvcompositeresinrestorations AT leilikhayam comparisonoftheabilityoftwobrandsofcbctwiththatofsemtodetectthemarginalleakageofclassvcompositeresinrestorations |