Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension

The paper analyses the phenomenon of populism and its impact on Turkish foreign policy in three dimensions: institutional, instrumental and ideological. The research scrutinizes a wide selection of party manifestos and public speeches of Turkish politicians with primarily focus on Recep Tayyip Erdoğ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: P. V. Shlykov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moscow University Press 2021-07-01
Series:Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
Subjects:
Online Access:https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/105
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832572234309304320
author P. V. Shlykov
author_facet P. V. Shlykov
author_sort P. V. Shlykov
collection DOAJ
description The paper analyses the phenomenon of populism and its impact on Turkish foreign policy in three dimensions: institutional, instrumental and ideological. The research scrutinizes a wide selection of party manifestos and public speeches of Turkish politicians with primarily focus on Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s statements during his incumbency as the prime-minister and the president. The embeddedness of populism in political culture of Turkey provided it with ideological flexibility and made populism almost a universal instrument for engaging with electorate. Starting from Turkey’s transition to multiparty system the majority of political actors have resorted to populism in one or another way. Erdoğan has not only continued this tendency but mastered the populist rhetoric. The character and content of Erdoğan’s populism fluctuated following the changing domestic and international environment. In the 2000s it was hinged on the loose concept of conservative democracy. At the turn of the 2000s and 2010s the dreams for the EU membership gave way to ideas of ‘civilizational expansionism’ which had the concept of Islamic/Ottoman civilization as its core. From the mid-2010s ultra nationalism has come to the forefront of the populist rhetoric. Eventually, the populist binary opposition of ‘us’ and ‘they’ took a definite shape of global confrontation between Turkey as a defender of Islam and the ‘adverse’ West. Populist rhetoric helped Erdoğan to justify his almost two-decades-long incumbency and evade direct responsibility for economic hardships of the 2010s. Populism has become an effective instrument to monopolize the foreign policy in the hands of Erdoğan. Utilizing negative rhetoric against Turkish professional diplomats within the last decade Erdoğan has managed to cement his clout over the foreign-policy making. Institutionally the expansion of populism in the sphere of foreign policy led to its ‘domestication’ and ‘nationalization’ while its impact on the foreign policy discourse manifested itself in the spread of civilizationism. Making both domestic and foreign policy process more personalized Erdoğan has reinforced ‘personal authoritarianism’ at the expense of the state institutions. Thus their decline led to the ‘Erdoğanization of the Turkish politics’. The declarative pursuit of Turkey to get more independent and autonomous position in the international system resulted in the strategy of development with primarily focus on the bilateral relations with different states. Consequently Turkey, previously known as a consistent advocate of regional cooperation and integration, in many respects has become a regionally isolated state.
format Article
id doaj-art-c9fb601e3dc241e3a2c7e678a81e0167
institution Kabale University
issn 2076-7404
language English
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Moscow University Press
record_format Article
series Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
spelling doaj-art-c9fb601e3dc241e3a2c7e678a81e01672025-02-02T11:10:31ZengMoscow University PressВестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика2076-74042021-07-0113212617010.48015/2076-7404-2021-13-2-126-170104Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimensionP. V. Shlykov0Lomonosov Moscow State UniversityThe paper analyses the phenomenon of populism and its impact on Turkish foreign policy in three dimensions: institutional, instrumental and ideological. The research scrutinizes a wide selection of party manifestos and public speeches of Turkish politicians with primarily focus on Recep Tayyip Erdoğan’s statements during his incumbency as the prime-minister and the president. The embeddedness of populism in political culture of Turkey provided it with ideological flexibility and made populism almost a universal instrument for engaging with electorate. Starting from Turkey’s transition to multiparty system the majority of political actors have resorted to populism in one or another way. Erdoğan has not only continued this tendency but mastered the populist rhetoric. The character and content of Erdoğan’s populism fluctuated following the changing domestic and international environment. In the 2000s it was hinged on the loose concept of conservative democracy. At the turn of the 2000s and 2010s the dreams for the EU membership gave way to ideas of ‘civilizational expansionism’ which had the concept of Islamic/Ottoman civilization as its core. From the mid-2010s ultra nationalism has come to the forefront of the populist rhetoric. Eventually, the populist binary opposition of ‘us’ and ‘they’ took a definite shape of global confrontation between Turkey as a defender of Islam and the ‘adverse’ West. Populist rhetoric helped Erdoğan to justify his almost two-decades-long incumbency and evade direct responsibility for economic hardships of the 2010s. Populism has become an effective instrument to monopolize the foreign policy in the hands of Erdoğan. Utilizing negative rhetoric against Turkish professional diplomats within the last decade Erdoğan has managed to cement his clout over the foreign-policy making. Institutionally the expansion of populism in the sphere of foreign policy led to its ‘domestication’ and ‘nationalization’ while its impact on the foreign policy discourse manifested itself in the spread of civilizationism. Making both domestic and foreign policy process more personalized Erdoğan has reinforced ‘personal authoritarianism’ at the expense of the state institutions. Thus their decline led to the ‘Erdoğanization of the Turkish politics’. The declarative pursuit of Turkey to get more independent and autonomous position in the international system resulted in the strategy of development with primarily focus on the bilateral relations with different states. Consequently Turkey, previously known as a consistent advocate of regional cooperation and integration, in many respects has become a regionally isolated state.https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/105political culture of turkeypopulismauthoritarianismdemocracyturkish foreign policypivot to asiaturkey-euturkey-usrussia-turkey relations
spellingShingle P. V. Shlykov
Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension
Вестник Московского Университета. Серия XXV: Международные отношения и мировая политика
political culture of turkey
populism
authoritarianism
democracy
turkish foreign policy
pivot to asia
turkey-eu
turkey-us
russia-turkey relations
title Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension
title_full Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension
title_fullStr Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension
title_full_unstemmed Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension
title_short Populism in the political culture of Turkey: The foreign policy dimension
title_sort populism in the political culture of turkey the foreign policy dimension
topic political culture of turkey
populism
authoritarianism
democracy
turkish foreign policy
pivot to asia
turkey-eu
turkey-us
russia-turkey relations
url https://fmp.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/105
work_keys_str_mv AT pvshlykov populisminthepoliticalcultureofturkeytheforeignpolicydimension