Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity

Linear and quadratic discriminant analysis are two fundamental classification methods used in statistical learning. Moments (MM), maximum likelihood (ML), minimum volume ellipsoids (MVE), and t-distribution methods are used to estimate the parameter of independent variables on the multivariate norma...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Autcha Araveeporn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-01-01
Series:International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7829795
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562365180149760
author Autcha Araveeporn
author_facet Autcha Araveeporn
author_sort Autcha Araveeporn
collection DOAJ
description Linear and quadratic discriminant analysis are two fundamental classification methods used in statistical learning. Moments (MM), maximum likelihood (ML), minimum volume ellipsoids (MVE), and t-distribution methods are used to estimate the parameter of independent variables on the multivariate normal distribution in order to classify binary dependent variables. The MM and ML methods are popular and effective methods that approximate the distribution parameter and use observed data. However, the MVE and t-distribution methods focus on the resampling algorithm, a reliable tool for high resistance. This paper starts by explaining the concepts of linear and quadratic discriminant analysis and then presents the four other methods used to create the decision boundary. Our simulation study generated the independent variables by setting the coefficient correlation via multivariate normal distribution or multicollinearity, often through basic logistic regression used to construct the binary dependent variable. For application to Pima Indian diabetic dataset, we expressed the classification of diabetes as the dependent variable and used a dataset of eight independent variables. This paper aimed to determine the highest average percentage of accuracy. Our results showed that the MM and ML methods successfully used large independent variables for linear discriminant analysis (LDA). However, the t-distribution method of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) performed better when using small independent variables.
format Article
id doaj-art-c719fc37362b462e919c49d4c5444d44
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-0425
language English
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
spelling doaj-art-c719fc37362b462e919c49d4c5444d442025-02-03T01:22:48ZengWileyInternational Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences1687-04252022-01-01202210.1155/2022/7829795Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data MulticollinearityAutcha Araveeporn0Department of StatisticsLinear and quadratic discriminant analysis are two fundamental classification methods used in statistical learning. Moments (MM), maximum likelihood (ML), minimum volume ellipsoids (MVE), and t-distribution methods are used to estimate the parameter of independent variables on the multivariate normal distribution in order to classify binary dependent variables. The MM and ML methods are popular and effective methods that approximate the distribution parameter and use observed data. However, the MVE and t-distribution methods focus on the resampling algorithm, a reliable tool for high resistance. This paper starts by explaining the concepts of linear and quadratic discriminant analysis and then presents the four other methods used to create the decision boundary. Our simulation study generated the independent variables by setting the coefficient correlation via multivariate normal distribution or multicollinearity, often through basic logistic regression used to construct the binary dependent variable. For application to Pima Indian diabetic dataset, we expressed the classification of diabetes as the dependent variable and used a dataset of eight independent variables. This paper aimed to determine the highest average percentage of accuracy. Our results showed that the MM and ML methods successfully used large independent variables for linear discriminant analysis (LDA). However, the t-distribution method of quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA) performed better when using small independent variables.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7829795
spellingShingle Autcha Araveeporn
Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity
International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences
title Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity
title_full Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity
title_fullStr Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity
title_short Comparing the Linear and Quadratic Discriminant Analysis of Diabetes Disease Classification Based on Data Multicollinearity
title_sort comparing the linear and quadratic discriminant analysis of diabetes disease classification based on data multicollinearity
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7829795
work_keys_str_mv AT autchaaraveeporn comparingthelinearandquadraticdiscriminantanalysisofdiabetesdiseaseclassificationbasedondatamulticollinearity