Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice

Introduction: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are vital for continuous rhythm monitoring; however, post-implantation migration can impair device function. ILR migration may range from minor positional shifts causing discomfort to severe displacement, potentially resulting in device malfunction or...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Allam Harfoush
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2025-03-01
Series:American Heart Journal Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602225000084
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540421380636672
author Allam Harfoush
author_facet Allam Harfoush
author_sort Allam Harfoush
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are vital for continuous rhythm monitoring; however, post-implantation migration can impair device function. ILR migration may range from minor positional shifts causing discomfort to severe displacement, potentially resulting in device malfunction or requiring surgical intervention. This review examines migration patterns to identify factors associated with ILR migration. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE for case reports on ILR migration from inception to October 2024. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, device models, implantation sites, detection times, and interventions were qualitatively synthesised to identify factors linked to migration. Results: Older age, female gender, and specific comorbidities emerged as migration risk factors. Device implantation angulation and depth were common contributors. Migration typically followed a posterior or inferior direction and was detected within 5–35 days, often presenting as loss of connection or continuous chest pain. Migration was also observed following patient manipulation of the device. Although migration is rare, cases requiring video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) highlight the significant morbidity associated with this complication. Conclusion: Optimising implantation techniques and employing effective follow-up strategies can reduce the risk of migration and improve migration detection. Further studies with standardised reporting are needed to better understand this complication.
format Article
id doaj-art-c6de858e79cb48bb80698d0ab0e37579
institution Kabale University
issn 2666-6022
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series American Heart Journal Plus
spelling doaj-art-c6de858e79cb48bb80698d0ab0e375792025-02-05T04:32:42ZengElsevierAmerican Heart Journal Plus2666-60222025-03-0151100505Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practiceAllam Harfoush0The Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Society, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK; The Countess of Chester Hospital, Liverpool Road, Chester CH2 1UL, UK; The Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Chester, Chester CH1 4BJ, UK.Introduction: Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are vital for continuous rhythm monitoring; however, post-implantation migration can impair device function. ILR migration may range from minor positional shifts causing discomfort to severe displacement, potentially resulting in device malfunction or requiring surgical intervention. This review examines migration patterns to identify factors associated with ILR migration. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE for case reports on ILR migration from inception to October 2024. Data on patient demographics, comorbidities, device models, implantation sites, detection times, and interventions were qualitatively synthesised to identify factors linked to migration. Results: Older age, female gender, and specific comorbidities emerged as migration risk factors. Device implantation angulation and depth were common contributors. Migration typically followed a posterior or inferior direction and was detected within 5–35 days, often presenting as loss of connection or continuous chest pain. Migration was also observed following patient manipulation of the device. Although migration is rare, cases requiring video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) highlight the significant morbidity associated with this complication. Conclusion: Optimising implantation techniques and employing effective follow-up strategies can reduce the risk of migration and improve migration detection. Further studies with standardised reporting are needed to better understand this complication.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602225000084Implantable loop recorder migrationArrhythmia monitoringDevice displacementPost-implantation complications
spellingShingle Allam Harfoush
Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice
American Heart Journal Plus
Implantable loop recorder migration
Arrhythmia monitoring
Device displacement
Post-implantation complications
title Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice
title_full Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice
title_fullStr Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice
title_short Implantable loop recorder migration: Case-based review and implications for clinical practice
title_sort implantable loop recorder migration case based review and implications for clinical practice
topic Implantable loop recorder migration
Arrhythmia monitoring
Device displacement
Post-implantation complications
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666602225000084
work_keys_str_mv AT allamharfoush implantablelooprecordermigrationcasebasedreviewandimplicationsforclinicalpractice