The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study

Background Pedagogically sound curricula are needed for occupational therapy (OT) students to adopt evidence-based practice (EBP) principles and internalise EBP within their professional identities. Exploring students’ perceptions of this knowledge area can contribute to effective curriculum design....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tanya Rihtman, Mike Morgan, Julie Booth
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2024-12-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11038128.2024.2391318
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832587170732310528
author Tanya Rihtman
Mike Morgan
Julie Booth
author_facet Tanya Rihtman
Mike Morgan
Julie Booth
author_sort Tanya Rihtman
collection DOAJ
description Background Pedagogically sound curricula are needed for occupational therapy (OT) students to adopt evidence-based practice (EBP) principles and internalise EBP within their professional identities. Exploring students’ perceptions of this knowledge area can contribute to effective curriculum design.Aims/Objectives To explore the evolution of pre-registration OT student perceptions of research and EBP over the course of their engagement with undergraduate teaching and learning.Materials and methods The Q-sort approach synthesises different viewpoints regarding a sample of statements, using by-person factor analysis (respondents = variables; statements = sample). Final year pre-registration OT students completed the same Q-sort at three timepoints (pre-dissertation [n = 18]; post-dissertation submission [n = 12]; post-student research conference [n = 6]). Q-sort responses were intercorrelated and factor-analysed; extraction of factors with an eigenvalue of ¬>0.9 and varimax rotation identified majority viewpoints.Results Significant factors were revealed at each timepoint: 1a: ‘Evidence–inseparable from OT practice’, 1b: ‘Research for research’s sake-inseparable from the occupational therapy identity’, 2: ‘Who am I to question the gurus?’, 3: ‘I can do it with confidence…but so what?’Conclusions Opportunities for completing ‘authentic’ student research projects, with ‘ownership’ of results, may enhance research and EBP confidence and professional identity.Significance Findings expand current knowledge regarding effective use of pre-registration educational opportunities to support future research and EBP.
format Article
id doaj-art-c662fa766d4b46b79102ae1298bb128c
institution Kabale University
issn 1103-8128
1651-2014
language English
publishDate 2024-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
spelling doaj-art-c662fa766d4b46b79102ae1298bb128c2025-01-24T17:53:18ZengTaylor & Francis GroupScandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy1103-81281651-20142024-12-0131110.1080/11038128.2024.2391318The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology studyTanya Rihtman0Mike Morgan1Julie Booth2Department of Sport, Health Sciences and Social Work, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Marston, Oxford, UKSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Coventry University, Coventry, UKSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Coventry University, Coventry, UKBackground Pedagogically sound curricula are needed for occupational therapy (OT) students to adopt evidence-based practice (EBP) principles and internalise EBP within their professional identities. Exploring students’ perceptions of this knowledge area can contribute to effective curriculum design.Aims/Objectives To explore the evolution of pre-registration OT student perceptions of research and EBP over the course of their engagement with undergraduate teaching and learning.Materials and methods The Q-sort approach synthesises different viewpoints regarding a sample of statements, using by-person factor analysis (respondents = variables; statements = sample). Final year pre-registration OT students completed the same Q-sort at three timepoints (pre-dissertation [n = 18]; post-dissertation submission [n = 12]; post-student research conference [n = 6]). Q-sort responses were intercorrelated and factor-analysed; extraction of factors with an eigenvalue of ¬>0.9 and varimax rotation identified majority viewpoints.Results Significant factors were revealed at each timepoint: 1a: ‘Evidence–inseparable from OT practice’, 1b: ‘Research for research’s sake-inseparable from the occupational therapy identity’, 2: ‘Who am I to question the gurus?’, 3: ‘I can do it with confidence…but so what?’Conclusions Opportunities for completing ‘authentic’ student research projects, with ‘ownership’ of results, may enhance research and EBP confidence and professional identity.Significance Findings expand current knowledge regarding effective use of pre-registration educational opportunities to support future research and EBP.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11038128.2024.2391318Attitudesevidence-based practiceoccupational therapypedagogyQ-methodologyresearch capability
spellingShingle Tanya Rihtman
Mike Morgan
Julie Booth
The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Attitudes
evidence-based practice
occupational therapy
pedagogy
Q-methodology
research capability
title The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
title_full The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
title_fullStr The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
title_full_unstemmed The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
title_short The development of pre-registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence-based practice: A Q-methodology study
title_sort development of pre registration occupational therapy student perceptions of research and evidence based practice a q methodology study
topic Attitudes
evidence-based practice
occupational therapy
pedagogy
Q-methodology
research capability
url https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/11038128.2024.2391318
work_keys_str_mv AT tanyarihtman thedevelopmentofpreregistrationoccupationaltherapystudentperceptionsofresearchandevidencebasedpracticeaqmethodologystudy
AT mikemorgan thedevelopmentofpreregistrationoccupationaltherapystudentperceptionsofresearchandevidencebasedpracticeaqmethodologystudy
AT juliebooth thedevelopmentofpreregistrationoccupationaltherapystudentperceptionsofresearchandevidencebasedpracticeaqmethodologystudy
AT tanyarihtman developmentofpreregistrationoccupationaltherapystudentperceptionsofresearchandevidencebasedpracticeaqmethodologystudy
AT mikemorgan developmentofpreregistrationoccupationaltherapystudentperceptionsofresearchandevidencebasedpracticeaqmethodologystudy
AT juliebooth developmentofpreregistrationoccupationaltherapystudentperceptionsofresearchandevidencebasedpracticeaqmethodologystudy