Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma

Aim. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and software-based image fusion of both modalities in the imaging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: B. Henninger, D. Putzer, D. Kendler, C. Uprimny, I. Virgolini, E. Gunsilius, R. Bale
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2012-01-01
Series:The Scientific World Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/821694
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832551214341947392
author B. Henninger
D. Putzer
D. Kendler
C. Uprimny
I. Virgolini
E. Gunsilius
R. Bale
author_facet B. Henninger
D. Putzer
D. Kendler
C. Uprimny
I. Virgolini
E. Gunsilius
R. Bale
author_sort B. Henninger
collection DOAJ
description Aim. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and software-based image fusion of both modalities in the imaging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD). Methods. 77 patients with NHL (𝑛=58) or HD (𝑛=19) underwent a FDG PET scan, a contrast-enhanced CT, and a subsequent digital image fusion during initial staging or followup. 109 examinations of each modality were evaluated and compared to each other. Conventional staging procedures, other imaging techniques, laboratory screening, and follow-up data constituted the reference standard for comparison with image fusion. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for CT and PET separately. Results. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting malignant lymphoma were 90% and 76% for CT and 94% and 91% for PET, respectively. A lymph node region-based analysis (comprising 14 defined anatomical regions) revealed a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 97% for CT and 96% and 99% for FDG PET, respectively. Only three of 109 image fusion findings needed further evaluation (false positive). Conclusion. Digital fusion of PET and CT improves the accuracy of staging, restaging, and therapy monitoring in patients with malignant lymphoma and may reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures.
format Article
id doaj-art-c6242800dacc48788dd33d0d3d59b65b
institution Kabale University
issn 1537-744X
language English
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series The Scientific World Journal
spelling doaj-art-c6242800dacc48788dd33d0d3d59b65b2025-02-03T06:04:42ZengWileyThe Scientific World Journal1537-744X2012-01-01201210.1100/2012/821694821694Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant LymphomaB. Henninger0D. Putzer1D. Kendler2C. Uprimny3I. Virgolini4E. Gunsilius5R. Bale6Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaAim. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET), computed tomography (CT), and software-based image fusion of both modalities in the imaging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and Hodgkin's disease (HD). Methods. 77 patients with NHL (𝑛=58) or HD (𝑛=19) underwent a FDG PET scan, a contrast-enhanced CT, and a subsequent digital image fusion during initial staging or followup. 109 examinations of each modality were evaluated and compared to each other. Conventional staging procedures, other imaging techniques, laboratory screening, and follow-up data constituted the reference standard for comparison with image fusion. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for CT and PET separately. Results. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting malignant lymphoma were 90% and 76% for CT and 94% and 91% for PET, respectively. A lymph node region-based analysis (comprising 14 defined anatomical regions) revealed a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 97% for CT and 96% and 99% for FDG PET, respectively. Only three of 109 image fusion findings needed further evaluation (false positive). Conclusion. Digital fusion of PET and CT improves the accuracy of staging, restaging, and therapy monitoring in patients with malignant lymphoma and may reduce the need for invasive diagnostic procedures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/821694
spellingShingle B. Henninger
D. Putzer
D. Kendler
C. Uprimny
I. Virgolini
E. Gunsilius
R. Bale
Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
The Scientific World Journal
title Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
title_full Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
title_fullStr Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
title_short Diagnostic Value of Software-Based Image Fusion of Computed Tomography and F18-FDG PET Scans in Patients with Malignant Lymphoma
title_sort diagnostic value of software based image fusion of computed tomography and f18 fdg pet scans in patients with malignant lymphoma
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/821694
work_keys_str_mv AT bhenninger diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma
AT dputzer diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma
AT dkendler diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma
AT cuprimny diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma
AT ivirgolini diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma
AT egunsilius diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma
AT rbale diagnosticvalueofsoftwarebasedimagefusionofcomputedtomographyandf18fdgpetscansinpatientswithmalignantlymphoma