The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Background. Enteral nutrition (EN) is often used in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but some studies have shown that EN has its disadvantages. However, it is not clear which nutritional support is appropriate to reduce mortality, improve prognosis, and improve nutritional status in patie...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Emergency Medicine International |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8867614 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832547945746006016 |
|---|---|
| author | Yan Qin Maoxia Liu Fengbao Guo Du Chen Peng Yang Xionghui Chen Feng Xu |
| author_facet | Yan Qin Maoxia Liu Fengbao Guo Du Chen Peng Yang Xionghui Chen Feng Xu |
| author_sort | Yan Qin |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background. Enteral nutrition (EN) is often used in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but some studies have shown that EN has its disadvantages. However, it is not clear which nutritional support is appropriate to reduce mortality, improve prognosis, and improve nutritional status in patients with TBI. We performed this Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the improvement of nutritional indicators and the clinical outcomes of patients with TBI. Methods. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception until December 2021. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effects of different nutritional supports on clinical outcomes and nutritional indicators in patients with TBI were included. The co-primary outcomes included mortality and the value of serum albumin. The secondary outcomes were nitrogen balance, the length of study (LOS) in the ICU, and feeding-related complications. The network meta-analysis was performed to adjust for indirect comparison and mixed treatment analysis. Results. 7 studies enroll a total of 456 patients who received different nutritional supports including parenteral nutrition (PN), enteral nutrition (EN), and PN + EN. No effects on in-hospital mortality (Median RR = 1.06, 95% Crl = 0.12 to 1.77) and the value of 0-1 days of serum albumin were found between the included regimens. However, the value of 11–13 days of serum albumin of EN was better than that of PN (WMD = −4.95, 95% CI = −7.18 to −2.72, P<0.0001, I2 = 0%), and 16–20 days of serum albumin of EN + PN was better than that of EN (WMD = −7.42, 95% CI = −14.51 to −0.34, P=0.04, I2 = 90%). No effects on the 5–7 day nitrogen balance were found between the included regimens. In addition, the complications including pneumonia and sepsis have no statistical difference between EN and PN. EN was superior to PN in terms of LOS in the ICU and the incidence rate of stress ulcers. Although the difference in indirect comparisons between the included regimens was not statistically significant, the results showed that PN seemed to rank behind other regimens, and the difference between them was extremely small. Conclusion. Available evidence suggests that EN + PN appears to be the most effective strategy for patients with TBI in improving clinical outcomes and nutritional support compared with other nutritional supports. Further trials are required. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-c3551a9335a04efe8559f1e60696c653 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2090-2859 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Emergency Medicine International |
| spelling | doaj-art-c3551a9335a04efe8559f1e60696c6532025-02-03T06:42:49ZengWileyEmergency Medicine International2090-28592023-01-01202310.1155/2023/8867614The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-AnalysisYan Qin0Maoxia Liu1Fengbao Guo2Du Chen3Peng Yang4Xionghui Chen5Feng Xu6Department of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineDepartment of Emergency MedicineBackground. Enteral nutrition (EN) is often used in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI), but some studies have shown that EN has its disadvantages. However, it is not clear which nutritional support is appropriate to reduce mortality, improve prognosis, and improve nutritional status in patients with TBI. We performed this Bayesian network meta-analysis to evaluate the improvement of nutritional indicators and the clinical outcomes of patients with TBI. Methods. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception until December 2021. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the effects of different nutritional supports on clinical outcomes and nutritional indicators in patients with TBI were included. The co-primary outcomes included mortality and the value of serum albumin. The secondary outcomes were nitrogen balance, the length of study (LOS) in the ICU, and feeding-related complications. The network meta-analysis was performed to adjust for indirect comparison and mixed treatment analysis. Results. 7 studies enroll a total of 456 patients who received different nutritional supports including parenteral nutrition (PN), enteral nutrition (EN), and PN + EN. No effects on in-hospital mortality (Median RR = 1.06, 95% Crl = 0.12 to 1.77) and the value of 0-1 days of serum albumin were found between the included regimens. However, the value of 11–13 days of serum albumin of EN was better than that of PN (WMD = −4.95, 95% CI = −7.18 to −2.72, P<0.0001, I2 = 0%), and 16–20 days of serum albumin of EN + PN was better than that of EN (WMD = −7.42, 95% CI = −14.51 to −0.34, P=0.04, I2 = 90%). No effects on the 5–7 day nitrogen balance were found between the included regimens. In addition, the complications including pneumonia and sepsis have no statistical difference between EN and PN. EN was superior to PN in terms of LOS in the ICU and the incidence rate of stress ulcers. Although the difference in indirect comparisons between the included regimens was not statistically significant, the results showed that PN seemed to rank behind other regimens, and the difference between them was extremely small. Conclusion. Available evidence suggests that EN + PN appears to be the most effective strategy for patients with TBI in improving clinical outcomes and nutritional support compared with other nutritional supports. Further trials are required.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8867614 |
| spellingShingle | Yan Qin Maoxia Liu Fengbao Guo Du Chen Peng Yang Xionghui Chen Feng Xu The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Emergency Medicine International |
| title | The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_full | The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_fullStr | The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_short | The Efficacy of Parenteral Nutrition and Enteral Nutrition Supports in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systemic Review and Network Meta-Analysis |
| title_sort | efficacy of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition supports in traumatic brain injury a systemic review and network meta analysis |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/8867614 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yanqin theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maoxialiu theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fengbaoguo theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT duchen theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT pengyang theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xionghuichen theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fengxu theefficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT yanqin efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT maoxialiu efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fengbaoguo efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT duchen efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT pengyang efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT xionghuichen efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis AT fengxu efficacyofparenteralnutritionandenteralnutritionsupportsintraumaticbraininjuryasystemicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis |