Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases.
Animal studies generate valuable hypotheses that lead to the conduct of preventive or therapeutic clinical trials. We assessed whether there is evidence for excess statistical significance in results of animal studies on neurological disorders, suggesting biases. We used data from meta-analyses of i...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Konstantinos K Tsilidis, Orestis A Panagiotou, Emily S Sena, Eleni Aretouli, Evangelos Evangelou, David W Howells, Rustam Al-Shahi Salman, Malcolm R Macleod, John P A Ioannidis |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-07-01
|
| Series: | PLoS Biology |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001609 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy.
by: Emily S Sena, et al.
Published: (2010-03-01) -
A polygenic risk score model for psoriasis based on the protein interactions of psoriasis susceptibility loci
by: Charalabos Antonatos, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01) -
Studying Social Cognition in Patients with Schizophrenia and Patients with Frontotemporal Dementia: Theory of Mind and the Perception of Sarcasm
by: Mary H. Kosmidis, et al.
Published: (2008-01-01) -
Olfactory Ensheathing Cell Transplantation in Experimental Spinal Cord Injury: Effect size and Reporting Bias of 62 Experimental Treatments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
by: Ralf Watzlawick, et al.
Published: (2016-05-01) -
Risk of Bias in Reports of In Vivo Research: A Focus for Improvement.
by: Malcolm R Macleod, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)