Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method

In order to investigate the feasibility and reliability of the three-dimensional particle flow method in simulating the type I fracture toughness test, four types of numerical samples were established by particle flow code PFC3D: straight crack three-point bending (SC3PB), edge cracked flattened sem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ling Yue, Bangyong Yu, Chengxi Zhao, Fei Guo, Fei Huang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Advances in Civil Engineering
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8812205
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832561455039250432
author Ling Yue
Bangyong Yu
Chengxi Zhao
Fei Guo
Fei Huang
author_facet Ling Yue
Bangyong Yu
Chengxi Zhao
Fei Guo
Fei Huang
author_sort Ling Yue
collection DOAJ
description In order to investigate the feasibility and reliability of the three-dimensional particle flow method in simulating the type I fracture toughness test, four types of numerical samples were established by particle flow code PFC3D: straight crack three-point bending (SC3PB), edge cracked flattened semicircular disc (ECFSD), cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc (CCNBD), and edge cracked flattened ring (ECFR). Three models with different strength parameters (group A, group B, and group C) were established for each type, in which group A parameters are obtained from the concrete model, group B parameters are applied for simulating marble, and group C parameters are for granite. The type I fracture toughness and the failure form of each model are obtained by conducting the numerical test, and the curves of load versus displacement of loading point are recorded. The numerical test results show that, with the same strength parameter, the maximum difference in test results of each specimen type is 0.39 MPa·m1/2. The KIC of ECFR specimen is 0.13–0.28 MPa·m1/2 smaller than that of CCNBD specimen, and the KIC of ECFSD specimen is slightly higher than that of CCNBD sample. The KIC of SC3PB specimen is 0.06–0.21 MPa·m1/2 smaller than that of the CCNBD sample. When the loading rate is less than 0.01 m/s, the effect of loading rate on fracture toughness can be reduced to less than 0.1 MPa·m1/2.
format Article
id doaj-art-bc97fb6d8b7e460697f0ff8c971ec19a
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8086
1687-8094
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Advances in Civil Engineering
spelling doaj-art-bc97fb6d8b7e460697f0ff8c971ec19a2025-02-03T01:24:57ZengWileyAdvances in Civil Engineering1687-80861687-80942020-01-01202010.1155/2020/88122058812205Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow MethodLing Yue0Bangyong Yu1Chengxi Zhao2Fei Guo3Fei Huang4Institute of Construction Engineering, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Engineering, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, ChinaInstitute of Construction Engineering, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Engineering, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, ChinaInstitute of Construction Engineering, Changzhou Vocational Institute of Engineering, Changzhou 213164, Jiangsu, ChinaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory of Geological Disaster of Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, ChinaChina Design Group Co., Ltd., Nanjing 210014, Jiangsu, ChinaIn order to investigate the feasibility and reliability of the three-dimensional particle flow method in simulating the type I fracture toughness test, four types of numerical samples were established by particle flow code PFC3D: straight crack three-point bending (SC3PB), edge cracked flattened semicircular disc (ECFSD), cracked chevron notched Brazilian disc (CCNBD), and edge cracked flattened ring (ECFR). Three models with different strength parameters (group A, group B, and group C) were established for each type, in which group A parameters are obtained from the concrete model, group B parameters are applied for simulating marble, and group C parameters are for granite. The type I fracture toughness and the failure form of each model are obtained by conducting the numerical test, and the curves of load versus displacement of loading point are recorded. The numerical test results show that, with the same strength parameter, the maximum difference in test results of each specimen type is 0.39 MPa·m1/2. The KIC of ECFR specimen is 0.13–0.28 MPa·m1/2 smaller than that of CCNBD specimen, and the KIC of ECFSD specimen is slightly higher than that of CCNBD sample. The KIC of SC3PB specimen is 0.06–0.21 MPa·m1/2 smaller than that of the CCNBD sample. When the loading rate is less than 0.01 m/s, the effect of loading rate on fracture toughness can be reduced to less than 0.1 MPa·m1/2.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8812205
spellingShingle Ling Yue
Bangyong Yu
Chengxi Zhao
Fei Guo
Fei Huang
Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method
Advances in Civil Engineering
title Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method
title_full Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method
title_fullStr Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method
title_full_unstemmed Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method
title_short Type I Fracture Toughness Test of Rock-like Materials Based on the Particle Flow Method
title_sort type i fracture toughness test of rock like materials based on the particle flow method
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8812205
work_keys_str_mv AT lingyue typeifracturetoughnesstestofrocklikematerialsbasedontheparticleflowmethod
AT bangyongyu typeifracturetoughnesstestofrocklikematerialsbasedontheparticleflowmethod
AT chengxizhao typeifracturetoughnesstestofrocklikematerialsbasedontheparticleflowmethod
AT feiguo typeifracturetoughnesstestofrocklikematerialsbasedontheparticleflowmethod
AT feihuang typeifracturetoughnesstestofrocklikematerialsbasedontheparticleflowmethod