Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model
Sixty-four years have passed since the announcement of the cellulose acetate membrane for seawater desalination by Loeb and Sourirajan at UCLA on 23 Aug 1960. Reverse osmosis (RO) is now well established as a process for desalination of seawater, brackish water, as well as for wastewater treatment....
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2025-02-01
|
| Series: | Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frmst.2025.1513591/full |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832542330643546112 |
|---|---|
| author | Takeshi Matsuura Michael D. Guiver Woei Jye Lau Ahmad Fauzi Ismail |
| author_facet | Takeshi Matsuura Michael D. Guiver Woei Jye Lau Ahmad Fauzi Ismail |
| author_sort | Takeshi Matsuura |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Sixty-four years have passed since the announcement of the cellulose acetate membrane for seawater desalination by Loeb and Sourirajan at UCLA on 23 Aug 1960. Reverse osmosis (RO) is now well established as a process for desalination of seawater, brackish water, as well as for wastewater treatment. The number of research papers on RO is growing. In contrast to the numerous publications on RO membrane preparation and applications, studies on transport mechanisms have been largely neglected. However, this changed recently when M. Elimelech’s research group from Yale University published several papers challenging the applicability of the solution‒diffusion (S‒D) model. Especially, in the most recent paper published in 2024, they have shown seven reasons why the well-accepted S‒D model appears to be wrong. It is interesting to note that, according to Srinivasa Sourirajan, one of the co-inventors of cellulose acetate RO membrane, their work was guided by the Preferential Sorption‒Capillary Flow model. Moreover, he wrote that this pore model was based on the presence of a pure water layer at the salt solution‒air interface, which could be predicted by the Gibbs Adsorption Isotherm. The purpose of this short communication is to present some observations and discussion in response to the 2024 paper published by Elimelech’s group in Desalination journal. In addition, the Gibbs Adsorption Isotherm was revisited to examine if there is a pure water layer at the sodium chloride‒cellulose acetate membrane interface. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-bbe946a01eb741b7ad6c60775c7c011b |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2813-1010 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-02-01 |
| publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology |
| spelling | doaj-art-bbe946a01eb741b7ad6c60775c7c011b2025-02-04T06:31:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology2813-10102025-02-01410.3389/frmst.2025.15135911513591Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion modelTakeshi Matsuura0Michael D. Guiver1Woei Jye Lau2Ahmad Fauzi Ismail3Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, CanadaState Key Laboratory of Engines, School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, ChinaAdvanced Membrane Technology Research Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, MalaysiaAdvanced Membrane Technology Research Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor, MalaysiaSixty-four years have passed since the announcement of the cellulose acetate membrane for seawater desalination by Loeb and Sourirajan at UCLA on 23 Aug 1960. Reverse osmosis (RO) is now well established as a process for desalination of seawater, brackish water, as well as for wastewater treatment. The number of research papers on RO is growing. In contrast to the numerous publications on RO membrane preparation and applications, studies on transport mechanisms have been largely neglected. However, this changed recently when M. Elimelech’s research group from Yale University published several papers challenging the applicability of the solution‒diffusion (S‒D) model. Especially, in the most recent paper published in 2024, they have shown seven reasons why the well-accepted S‒D model appears to be wrong. It is interesting to note that, according to Srinivasa Sourirajan, one of the co-inventors of cellulose acetate RO membrane, their work was guided by the Preferential Sorption‒Capillary Flow model. Moreover, he wrote that this pore model was based on the presence of a pure water layer at the salt solution‒air interface, which could be predicted by the Gibbs Adsorption Isotherm. The purpose of this short communication is to present some observations and discussion in response to the 2024 paper published by Elimelech’s group in Desalination journal. In addition, the Gibbs Adsorption Isotherm was revisited to examine if there is a pure water layer at the sodium chloride‒cellulose acetate membrane interface.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frmst.2025.1513591/fullreverse osmosissolution-diffusion modelGibbs Adsorption Isothermpreferential sorption-capillary flow modelmembrane desalination |
| spellingShingle | Takeshi Matsuura Michael D. Guiver Woei Jye Lau Ahmad Fauzi Ismail Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model Frontiers in Membrane Science and Technology reverse osmosis solution-diffusion model Gibbs Adsorption Isotherm preferential sorption-capillary flow model membrane desalination |
| title | Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model |
| title_full | Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model |
| title_fullStr | Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model |
| title_full_unstemmed | Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model |
| title_short | Transport in reverse osmosis membranes: observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution‒diffusion model |
| title_sort | transport in reverse osmosis membranes observations and comments on the pore flow model versus the solution diffusion model |
| topic | reverse osmosis solution-diffusion model Gibbs Adsorption Isotherm preferential sorption-capillary flow model membrane desalination |
| url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frmst.2025.1513591/full |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT takeshimatsuura transportinreverseosmosismembranesobservationsandcommentsontheporeflowmodelversusthesolutiondiffusionmodel AT michaeldguiver transportinreverseosmosismembranesobservationsandcommentsontheporeflowmodelversusthesolutiondiffusionmodel AT woeijyelau transportinreverseosmosismembranesobservationsandcommentsontheporeflowmodelversusthesolutiondiffusionmodel AT ahmadfauziismail transportinreverseosmosismembranesobservationsandcommentsontheporeflowmodelversusthesolutiondiffusionmodel |