Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land

Coal surface mining in northern Great Plains USA led to reclamation experiments with soil respreading. Respread soil depth (RSD) and runoff of water redistribution (WR) effects interacted in original North Dakota studies, complicating interpretations. We determined WR and soil depth/soil quality (SQ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stephen D. Merrill, Mark A. Liebig, John D. Hendrickson, Abbey F. Wick
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Agronomy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1431054
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832552042780950528
author Stephen D. Merrill
Mark A. Liebig
John D. Hendrickson
Abbey F. Wick
author_facet Stephen D. Merrill
Mark A. Liebig
John D. Hendrickson
Abbey F. Wick
author_sort Stephen D. Merrill
collection DOAJ
description Coal surface mining in northern Great Plains USA led to reclamation experiments with soil respreading. Respread soil depth (RSD) and runoff of water redistribution (WR) effects interacted in original North Dakota studies, complicating interpretations. We determined WR and soil depth/soil quality (SQ) effects on hillslope production patterns for sites with soil wedges (2%–5% slope, 50-m length) over sodic mine spoils. At Zap, cool-season forages crested wheatgrass (CWG: Agropyron cristatum) and Russian wildrye (Psathyrostachys juncea) generally decreased as RSD increased upslope. At Stanton, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), native grasses (Bouteloua spp.), and CWG responded to RSD, increasing 70% to midslope and decreasing further. A SQ index (SQI) based on six indicator properties was highly correlated (r > 0.7) with RSD. Yield regressions with RSD or SQI were generally significant for Stanton forages and for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) at both sites. Yield regressions with WR index (catchment area-based) indicated dominance of WR effects at Zap. Cool-season forages at Zap evidently responded to springtime runoff, while Stanton forages and spring wheat at both sites used water later in the season and responded to soil depth/SQ effects. Results suggest models for interaction of SQ and landform WR affecting productivity should include plant community composition and water-use information.
format Article
id doaj-art-ba79cce1e37d4f8a90b55b3bd6248c3b
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-8159
1687-8167
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Agronomy
spelling doaj-art-ba79cce1e37d4f8a90b55b3bd6248c3b2025-02-03T05:59:44ZengWileyInternational Journal of Agronomy1687-81591687-81672018-01-01201810.1155/2018/14310541431054Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined LandStephen D. Merrill0Mark A. Liebig1John D. Hendrickson2Abbey F. Wick3Northern Great Plains Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 459, 1701 10th Ave. SW, Mandan, ND 58554, USANorthern Great Plains Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 459, 1701 10th Ave. SW, Mandan, ND 58554, USANorthern Great Plains Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, P.O. Box 459, 1701 10th Ave. SW, Mandan, ND 58554, USADepartment of Soil Science, Walster Hall, North Dakota State University, Department 7680, P.O. Box 6050, Fargo, ND 58108-6050, USACoal surface mining in northern Great Plains USA led to reclamation experiments with soil respreading. Respread soil depth (RSD) and runoff of water redistribution (WR) effects interacted in original North Dakota studies, complicating interpretations. We determined WR and soil depth/soil quality (SQ) effects on hillslope production patterns for sites with soil wedges (2%–5% slope, 50-m length) over sodic mine spoils. At Zap, cool-season forages crested wheatgrass (CWG: Agropyron cristatum) and Russian wildrye (Psathyrostachys juncea) generally decreased as RSD increased upslope. At Stanton, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), native grasses (Bouteloua spp.), and CWG responded to RSD, increasing 70% to midslope and decreasing further. A SQ index (SQI) based on six indicator properties was highly correlated (r > 0.7) with RSD. Yield regressions with RSD or SQI were generally significant for Stanton forages and for spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) at both sites. Yield regressions with WR index (catchment area-based) indicated dominance of WR effects at Zap. Cool-season forages at Zap evidently responded to springtime runoff, while Stanton forages and spring wheat at both sites used water later in the season and responded to soil depth/SQ effects. Results suggest models for interaction of SQ and landform WR affecting productivity should include plant community composition and water-use information.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1431054
spellingShingle Stephen D. Merrill
Mark A. Liebig
John D. Hendrickson
Abbey F. Wick
Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land
International Journal of Agronomy
title Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land
title_full Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land
title_fullStr Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land
title_full_unstemmed Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land
title_short Soil Quality and Water Redistribution Influences on Plant Production over Low Hillslopes on Reclaimed Mined Land
title_sort soil quality and water redistribution influences on plant production over low hillslopes on reclaimed mined land
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/1431054
work_keys_str_mv AT stephendmerrill soilqualityandwaterredistributioninfluencesonplantproductionoverlowhillslopesonreclaimedminedland
AT markaliebig soilqualityandwaterredistributioninfluencesonplantproductionoverlowhillslopesonreclaimedminedland
AT johndhendrickson soilqualityandwaterredistributioninfluencesonplantproductionoverlowhillslopesonreclaimedminedland
AT abbeyfwick soilqualityandwaterredistributioninfluencesonplantproductionoverlowhillslopesonreclaimedminedland