3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE

Abstract Background This study compared the image quality and diagnostic utility of stack-of-stars echo-unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (SOS echo-uT1RESS) with the widely used magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence in brain tumor imaging. Methods In this prospect...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adrienn Tóth, Robert R. Edelman, Dmitrij Kravchenko, Justin A. Chetta, Jennifer Joyce, James Ira Griggers, Ruoxun Zi, Kai Tobias Block, M. Vittoria Spampinato, Akos Varga-Szemes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2025-08-01
Series:Cancer Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00924-7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1849234877219602432
author Adrienn Tóth
Robert R. Edelman
Dmitrij Kravchenko
Justin A. Chetta
Jennifer Joyce
James Ira Griggers
Ruoxun Zi
Kai Tobias Block
M. Vittoria Spampinato
Akos Varga-Szemes
author_facet Adrienn Tóth
Robert R. Edelman
Dmitrij Kravchenko
Justin A. Chetta
Jennifer Joyce
James Ira Griggers
Ruoxun Zi
Kai Tobias Block
M. Vittoria Spampinato
Akos Varga-Szemes
author_sort Adrienn Tóth
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background This study compared the image quality and diagnostic utility of stack-of-stars echo-unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (SOS echo-uT1RESS) with the widely used magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence in brain tumor imaging. Methods In this prospective, two-center observational study, each participant underwent 3T contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain with both standard MPRAGE and prototype SOS echo-uT1RESS sequences. Lesion size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and tumor-to-brain contrast were quantitatively analyzed. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and image artifacts were scored on a 4-point Likert scale, while diagnostic performance and assessment of the vascular and dural involvement were compared side-by-side by three readers. Results Thirty-four adult patients (mean age, 64 years ± 13 [SD], 12 men) with known brain tumors (N = 6 intra-axial primary tumors; N = 14 intra-axial metastases; N = 14 extra-axial tumors) were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in CNR between MPRAGE and SOS echo-uT1RESS (29.4 ± 21.4 vs. 28.2 ± 16.5, respectively; p = 0.80, r = 0.03). SOS echo-uT1RESS demonstrated a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared with MPRAGE (0.7 ± 0.4 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3, respectively; p < 0.001, r = 0.81). While overall image quality and image artifacts were similar for both sequences, SOS echo-uT1RESS showed improved lesion conspicuity (p < 0.001, r = 0.51) and improved diagnostic performance (p < 0.001, r = 0.53), particularly for small metastases. Conclusion SOS echo-uT1RESS enhanced lesion visibility, achieving approximately a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared to MPRAGE, although this finding may reflect both sequence properties and timing-related effects. The sequence maintained comparable overall image quality and robustness, making it a promising tool for brain tumor imaging.
format Article
id doaj-art-b64be6468d0c4579b5e8ac959ed0f1e5
institution Kabale University
issn 1470-7330
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Cancer Imaging
spelling doaj-art-b64be6468d0c4579b5e8ac959ed0f1e52025-08-20T04:03:00ZengBMCCancer Imaging1470-73302025-08-0125111110.1186/s40644-025-00924-73 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGEAdrienn Tóth0Robert R. Edelman1Dmitrij Kravchenko2Justin A. Chetta3Jennifer Joyce4James Ira Griggers5Ruoxun Zi6Kai Tobias Block7M. Vittoria Spampinato8Akos Varga-Szemes9Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaDepartment of Radiology, NorthShore University Health SystemDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaThe Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of MedicineThe Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of MedicineDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Medical University of South CarolinaAbstract Background This study compared the image quality and diagnostic utility of stack-of-stars echo-unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state (SOS echo-uT1RESS) with the widely used magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo (MPRAGE) sequence in brain tumor imaging. Methods In this prospective, two-center observational study, each participant underwent 3T contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain with both standard MPRAGE and prototype SOS echo-uT1RESS sequences. Lesion size, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and tumor-to-brain contrast were quantitatively analyzed. Overall image quality, lesion conspicuity, and image artifacts were scored on a 4-point Likert scale, while diagnostic performance and assessment of the vascular and dural involvement were compared side-by-side by three readers. Results Thirty-four adult patients (mean age, 64 years ± 13 [SD], 12 men) with known brain tumors (N = 6 intra-axial primary tumors; N = 14 intra-axial metastases; N = 14 extra-axial tumors) were enrolled in this study. There was no significant difference in CNR between MPRAGE and SOS echo-uT1RESS (29.4 ± 21.4 vs. 28.2 ± 16.5, respectively; p = 0.80, r = 0.03). SOS echo-uT1RESS demonstrated a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared with MPRAGE (0.7 ± 0.4 vs. 0.4 ± 0.3, respectively; p < 0.001, r = 0.81). While overall image quality and image artifacts were similar for both sequences, SOS echo-uT1RESS showed improved lesion conspicuity (p < 0.001, r = 0.51) and improved diagnostic performance (p < 0.001, r = 0.53), particularly for small metastases. Conclusion SOS echo-uT1RESS enhanced lesion visibility, achieving approximately a 1.8-fold improvement in tumor-to-brain contrast compared to MPRAGE, although this finding may reflect both sequence properties and timing-related effects. The sequence maintained comparable overall image quality and robustness, making it a promising tool for brain tumor imaging.https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00924-7BrainTumorMetastases3TMRIPulse sequence
spellingShingle Adrienn Tóth
Robert R. Edelman
Dmitrij Kravchenko
Justin A. Chetta
Jennifer Joyce
James Ira Griggers
Ruoxun Zi
Kai Tobias Block
M. Vittoria Spampinato
Akos Varga-Szemes
3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE
Cancer Imaging
Brain
Tumor
Metastases
3T
MRI
Pulse sequence
title 3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE
title_full 3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE
title_fullStr 3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE
title_full_unstemmed 3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE
title_short 3 Tesla stack-of-stars echo unbalanced T1 relaxation-enhanced steady-state MRI for brain tumor imaging: post-contrast comparison with MPRAGE
title_sort 3 tesla stack of stars echo unbalanced t1 relaxation enhanced steady state mri for brain tumor imaging post contrast comparison with mprage
topic Brain
Tumor
Metastases
3T
MRI
Pulse sequence
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-025-00924-7
work_keys_str_mv AT adrienntoth 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT robertredelman 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT dmitrijkravchenko 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT justinachetta 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT jenniferjoyce 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT jamesiragriggers 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT ruoxunzi 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT kaitobiasblock 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT mvittoriaspampinato 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage
AT akosvargaszemes 3teslastackofstarsechounbalancedt1relaxationenhancedsteadystatemriforbraintumorimagingpostcontrastcomparisonwithmprage