A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN
Fall detection is a major challenge in the development of technology-based healthcare systems, particularly in elderly care. This study aims to compare the performance of six classification algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Long Short-...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
EDP Sciences
2025-01-01
|
| Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
| Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/05/e3sconf_icenis2024_03051.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832098544860790784 |
|---|---|
| author | Afuan Lasmedi Isnanto R. Rizal |
| author_facet | Afuan Lasmedi Isnanto R. Rizal |
| author_sort | Afuan Lasmedi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Fall detection is a major challenge in the development of technology-based healthcare systems, particularly in elderly care. This study aims to compare the performance of six classification algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in detecting fall incidents using wearable sensor data such as accelerometers and gyroscopes. The research utilizes a dataset consisting of 1,428 training samples and 573 testing samples, evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation technique. The results show that CNN and LSTM deliver the best performance with accuracies of 94% and 92%, while Random Forest offers a good balance between accuracy and processing time. SVM and KNN exhibit faster processing times but slightly lower accuracies, at 87% and 84%, respectively. The superiority of CNN and LSTM in detecting more complex fall patterns aligns with previous studies emphasizing the capabilities of deep learning models in sensor data classification. The implications of these findings that the selection of fall detection algorithms must consider system priorities, whether focused on high accuracy or processing efficiency. Additionally, this research opens avenues for optimizing deep learning models and leveraging edge computing technologies to reduce response times in wearable device applications. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-b4d53fc4c2f44405ab90d3212e47d27d |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 2267-1242 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2025-01-01 |
| publisher | EDP Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | E3S Web of Conferences |
| spelling | doaj-art-b4d53fc4c2f44405ab90d3212e47d27d2025-02-05T10:49:10ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422025-01-016050305110.1051/e3sconf/202560503051e3sconf_icenis2024_03051A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNNAfuan Lasmedi0Isnanto R. Rizal1Department of Informatic, Engineering Faculty, Universitas Jenderal SoedirmanDepartment of Computer Engineering, Diponegoro UniversityFall detection is a major challenge in the development of technology-based healthcare systems, particularly in elderly care. This study aims to compare the performance of six classification algorithms: Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Decision Tree, Random Forest, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in detecting fall incidents using wearable sensor data such as accelerometers and gyroscopes. The research utilizes a dataset consisting of 1,428 training samples and 573 testing samples, evaluated using a 10-fold cross-validation technique. The results show that CNN and LSTM deliver the best performance with accuracies of 94% and 92%, while Random Forest offers a good balance between accuracy and processing time. SVM and KNN exhibit faster processing times but slightly lower accuracies, at 87% and 84%, respectively. The superiority of CNN and LSTM in detecting more complex fall patterns aligns with previous studies emphasizing the capabilities of deep learning models in sensor data classification. The implications of these findings that the selection of fall detection algorithms must consider system priorities, whether focused on high accuracy or processing efficiency. Additionally, this research opens avenues for optimizing deep learning models and leveraging edge computing technologies to reduce response times in wearable device applications.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/05/e3sconf_icenis2024_03051.pdf |
| spellingShingle | Afuan Lasmedi Isnanto R. Rizal A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN E3S Web of Conferences |
| title | A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN |
| title_full | A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN |
| title_fullStr | A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN |
| title_short | A comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology-based healthcare system: Analyzing SVM, KNN, decision tree, random forest, LSTM, and CNN |
| title_sort | comparative study of machine learning algorithms for fall detection in technology based healthcare system analyzing svm knn decision tree random forest lstm and cnn |
| url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2025/05/e3sconf_icenis2024_03051.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT afuanlasmedi acomparativestudyofmachinelearningalgorithmsforfalldetectionintechnologybasedhealthcaresystemanalyzingsvmknndecisiontreerandomforestlstmandcnn AT isnantorrizal acomparativestudyofmachinelearningalgorithmsforfalldetectionintechnologybasedhealthcaresystemanalyzingsvmknndecisiontreerandomforestlstmandcnn AT afuanlasmedi comparativestudyofmachinelearningalgorithmsforfalldetectionintechnologybasedhealthcaresystemanalyzingsvmknndecisiontreerandomforestlstmandcnn AT isnantorrizal comparativestudyofmachinelearningalgorithmsforfalldetectionintechnologybasedhealthcaresystemanalyzingsvmknndecisiontreerandomforestlstmandcnn |