Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream

Mimesis, the art of imitating the real world on the stage, is all the more difficult if this real world consists of a beast—a wild, dangerous, supposedly “obscene” animal in the Latin sense: literally off-stage. Such is the challenge faced by the amateur company of mechanicals who are producing the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mathilde La Cassagnère
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte" 2016-06-01
Series:Sillages Critiques
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/4413
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832578505878011904
author Mathilde La Cassagnère
author_facet Mathilde La Cassagnère
author_sort Mathilde La Cassagnère
collection DOAJ
description Mimesis, the art of imitating the real world on the stage, is all the more difficult if this real world consists of a beast—a wild, dangerous, supposedly “obscene” animal in the Latin sense: literally off-stage. Such is the challenge faced by the amateur company of mechanicals who are producing the love tragedy of Pyramus and Thisbe, A Midsummer Night’s Dream’s play within the play featuring a fearful lion. For all the efforts the mechanicals have engaged in the project, their rendition of the lion is such a failure that it has the on-stage spectators roar with laughter. This is a fairly convincing anticipation of Gaston Bachelard’s statement in Water and Dreams, “a ghost [a beast in this particular instance] complacently described loses its effect.” Thus, through the mechanicals’ theatrical misadventure, Shakespeare ironically includes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream a “how-not-to” guide for mimesis, a reversed mise en abyme of his own challenging conception of a play teeming with an unstageable and infinite variety of creatures great and small, wild and tame, familiar and fantastical, its presence all the more haunting as it is never staged strictly speaking. Neither staged nor completely off-scene, the bestiary of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, emblematized by the “enamel skin” shed “there” by the elusive “snake” (2.1.254), is featured on a subliminal and simultaneous scene, a sub-stage as it were, an Other Scene, involving humankind in a liminal confrontation with its own animality. This paper aims to explore the strategies—whether rooted in the Elizabethan worldview, or amazingly modern—through which Shakespeare stages this inward confrontation, while involving us in vertiginous reflexions on the theatre.
format Article
id doaj-art-b4d0cb22dc534f318a5ec3d8f45e29cb
institution Kabale University
issn 1272-3819
1969-6302
language English
publishDate 2016-06-01
publisher Centre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"
record_format Article
series Sillages Critiques
spelling doaj-art-b4d0cb22dc534f318a5ec3d8f45e29cb2025-01-30T13:48:06ZengCentre de Recherche "Texte et Critique de Texte"Sillages Critiques1272-38191969-63022016-06-012010.4000/sillagescritiques.4413Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s DreamMathilde La CassagnèreMimesis, the art of imitating the real world on the stage, is all the more difficult if this real world consists of a beast—a wild, dangerous, supposedly “obscene” animal in the Latin sense: literally off-stage. Such is the challenge faced by the amateur company of mechanicals who are producing the love tragedy of Pyramus and Thisbe, A Midsummer Night’s Dream’s play within the play featuring a fearful lion. For all the efforts the mechanicals have engaged in the project, their rendition of the lion is such a failure that it has the on-stage spectators roar with laughter. This is a fairly convincing anticipation of Gaston Bachelard’s statement in Water and Dreams, “a ghost [a beast in this particular instance] complacently described loses its effect.” Thus, through the mechanicals’ theatrical misadventure, Shakespeare ironically includes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream a “how-not-to” guide for mimesis, a reversed mise en abyme of his own challenging conception of a play teeming with an unstageable and infinite variety of creatures great and small, wild and tame, familiar and fantastical, its presence all the more haunting as it is never staged strictly speaking. Neither staged nor completely off-scene, the bestiary of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, emblematized by the “enamel skin” shed “there” by the elusive “snake” (2.1.254), is featured on a subliminal and simultaneous scene, a sub-stage as it were, an Other Scene, involving humankind in a liminal confrontation with its own animality. This paper aims to explore the strategies—whether rooted in the Elizabethan worldview, or amazingly modern—through which Shakespeare stages this inward confrontation, while involving us in vertiginous reflexions on the theatre.https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/4413Unstageable beastbeast within speechobscenescene / un-seensub-stageOther Scene
spellingShingle Mathilde La Cassagnère
Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
Sillages Critiques
Unstageable beast
beast within speech
obscene
scene / un-seen
sub-stage
Other Scene
title Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
title_full Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
title_fullStr Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
title_full_unstemmed Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
title_short Obscene beasts: the stage behind the scenes in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
title_sort obscene beasts the stage behind the scenes in a midsummer night s dream
topic Unstageable beast
beast within speech
obscene
scene / un-seen
sub-stage
Other Scene
url https://journals.openedition.org/sillagescritiques/4413
work_keys_str_mv AT mathildelacassagnere obscenebeaststhestagebehindthescenesinamidsummernightsdream