Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.

<h4>Background</h4>Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Musculoskeletal trauma results in the majority of post-traumatic morbidity and disability globally. The literature has reported many performance indicat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Dworkin, K J Agarwal-Harding, M Joseph, G Cahill, D Konadu-Yeboah, E Makasa, C Mock, MSK Indicator Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2023-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290816&type=printable
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832540135461224448
author M Dworkin
K J Agarwal-Harding
M Joseph
G Cahill
D Konadu-Yeboah
E Makasa
C Mock
MSK Indicator Group
author_facet M Dworkin
K J Agarwal-Harding
M Joseph
G Cahill
D Konadu-Yeboah
E Makasa
C Mock
MSK Indicator Group
author_sort M Dworkin
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Musculoskeletal trauma results in the majority of post-traumatic morbidity and disability globally. The literature has reported many performance indicators relating to trauma care, but few specific to musculoskeletal injuries.<h4>Study objectives</h4>The purpose of this study was to establish a practical list of performance indicators to evaluate and monitor the quality and equity of musculoskeletal trauma care delivery in health systems worldwide.<h4>Methods</h4>A scoping review was performed that identified performance indicators related to musculoskeletal trauma care. Indicators were organized by phase of care (general, prevention, pre-hospital, hospital, post-hospital) within a modified Donabedian model (structure, process, outcome, equity). A panel of 21 experts representing 45 countries was assembled to identify priority indicators utilizing a modified Delphi approach.<h4>Results</h4>The scoping review identified 1,206 articles and 114 underwent full text review. We included 95 articles which reported 498 unique performance indicators. Most indicators related to the hospital phase of care (n = 303, 60%) and structural characteristics (n = 221, 44%). Mortality (n = 50 articles) and presence of trauma registries (n = 16 articles) were the most frequently reported indicators. After 3 rounds of surveys our panel reached consensus on a parsimonious list of priority performance indicators. These focused on access to trauma care; processes and key resources for polytrauma triage, patient stabilization, and hemorrhage control; reduction and immobilization of fractures and dislocations; and management of compartment syndrome and open fractures.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The literature has reported many performance indicators relating to trauma care, but few specific to musculoskeletal injuries. To create quality and equitable trauma systems, musculoskeletal care must be incorporated into development plans with continuous monitoring and improvement. The performance indicators identified by our expert panel and organized in a modified Donabedian model can serve as a method for evaluating musculoskeletal trauma care.
format Article
id doaj-art-b3aacea65f7c40b4b8ea80e72d93186d
institution Kabale University
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj-art-b3aacea65f7c40b4b8ea80e72d93186d2025-02-05T05:32:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01188e029081610.1371/journal.pone.0290816Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.M DworkinK J Agarwal-HardingM JosephG CahillD Konadu-YeboahE MakasaC MockMSK Indicator Group<h4>Background</h4>Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity, disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries. Musculoskeletal trauma results in the majority of post-traumatic morbidity and disability globally. The literature has reported many performance indicators relating to trauma care, but few specific to musculoskeletal injuries.<h4>Study objectives</h4>The purpose of this study was to establish a practical list of performance indicators to evaluate and monitor the quality and equity of musculoskeletal trauma care delivery in health systems worldwide.<h4>Methods</h4>A scoping review was performed that identified performance indicators related to musculoskeletal trauma care. Indicators were organized by phase of care (general, prevention, pre-hospital, hospital, post-hospital) within a modified Donabedian model (structure, process, outcome, equity). A panel of 21 experts representing 45 countries was assembled to identify priority indicators utilizing a modified Delphi approach.<h4>Results</h4>The scoping review identified 1,206 articles and 114 underwent full text review. We included 95 articles which reported 498 unique performance indicators. Most indicators related to the hospital phase of care (n = 303, 60%) and structural characteristics (n = 221, 44%). Mortality (n = 50 articles) and presence of trauma registries (n = 16 articles) were the most frequently reported indicators. After 3 rounds of surveys our panel reached consensus on a parsimonious list of priority performance indicators. These focused on access to trauma care; processes and key resources for polytrauma triage, patient stabilization, and hemorrhage control; reduction and immobilization of fractures and dislocations; and management of compartment syndrome and open fractures.<h4>Conclusions</h4>The literature has reported many performance indicators relating to trauma care, but few specific to musculoskeletal injuries. To create quality and equitable trauma systems, musculoskeletal care must be incorporated into development plans with continuous monitoring and improvement. The performance indicators identified by our expert panel and organized in a modified Donabedian model can serve as a method for evaluating musculoskeletal trauma care.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290816&type=printable
spellingShingle M Dworkin
K J Agarwal-Harding
M Joseph
G Cahill
D Konadu-Yeboah
E Makasa
C Mock
MSK Indicator Group
Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
PLoS ONE
title Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
title_full Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
title_fullStr Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
title_full_unstemmed Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
title_short Indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems: A scoping review and Delphi study.
title_sort indicators for the evaluation of musculoskeletal trauma systems a scoping review and delphi study
url https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0290816&type=printable
work_keys_str_mv AT mdworkin indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT kjagarwalharding indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT mjoseph indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT gcahill indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT dkonaduyeboah indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT emakasa indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT cmock indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy
AT mskindicatorgroup indicatorsfortheevaluationofmusculoskeletaltraumasystemsascopingreviewanddelphistudy