Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada

Introduction. The use of cognitive aids (CAs) during critical events is thought to be useful. However, whether CAs are known and used by French and Canadian anaesthesia providers is not clear. Methods. A survey was emailed to French and Canadian anaesthesia providers in 2017 through their respective...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Antonia Blanié, Matthieu Kurrek, Sophie Gorse, Dimitri Baudrier, Dan Benhamou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1346051
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832566090701471744
author Antonia Blanié
Matthieu Kurrek
Sophie Gorse
Dimitri Baudrier
Dan Benhamou
author_facet Antonia Blanié
Matthieu Kurrek
Sophie Gorse
Dimitri Baudrier
Dan Benhamou
author_sort Antonia Blanié
collection DOAJ
description Introduction. The use of cognitive aids (CAs) during critical events is thought to be useful. However, whether CAs are known and used by French and Canadian anaesthesia providers is not clear. Methods. A survey was emailed to French and Canadian anaesthesia providers in 2017 through their respective national societies. It consisted of 23 questions about the participants’ demographics and their knowledge, use, and impact of CAs. A second survey was sent to French simulation centres. Results. 912 responses were recorded in France and 278 in Canada (overall response rate: 7% and 11%, respectively). Among the respondents, 700/899 in France (78%) versus 249/273 (91%) in Canada were familiar with the concept of cognitive dysfunction during a crisis and 501/893 (56%) in France versus 250/271 (92%) in Canada knew the concept of CAs. Amongst those respondents who knew about CAs, 189/492 (38%) in France versus 108/244 (44%) in Canada stated that they had already used a CA in real life and 225/493 (45%) in France versus 126/245 (51%) in Canada had received training in their use. Simulation was the principal modality for training in 150/225 (67%) of cases in France versus 47/126 (37%) in Canada. Among the 28/50 French simulation centres which responded (2018 January), 27 organised sessions in anaesthesia and 22 used CAs. Conclusion. CAs were better known in Canada than in France, but their actual use in real life was low in both countries. Simulation appears to play a potentially important role training anaesthesia providers in the use of CAs.
format Article
id doaj-art-b325292f62e847be992115dd00270b24
institution Kabale University
issn 1687-6962
1687-6970
language English
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Anesthesiology Research and Practice
spelling doaj-art-b325292f62e847be992115dd00270b242025-02-03T01:05:09ZengWileyAnesthesiology Research and Practice1687-69621687-69702020-01-01202010.1155/2020/13460511346051Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and CanadaAntonia Blanié0Matthieu Kurrek1Sophie Gorse2Dimitri Baudrier3Dan Benhamou4Centre de simulation LabForSIMS, Faculté de médecine Paris Saclay, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, FranceComité Analyse et Maîtrise du Risque, Société Française d’Anesthésie et de Réanimation (SFAR), Paris, FranceDépartement d’Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Bicêtre, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, FranceCentre de simulation LabForSIMS, Faculté de médecine Paris Saclay, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, FranceCentre de simulation LabForSIMS, Faculté de médecine Paris Saclay, 94275 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, FranceIntroduction. The use of cognitive aids (CAs) during critical events is thought to be useful. However, whether CAs are known and used by French and Canadian anaesthesia providers is not clear. Methods. A survey was emailed to French and Canadian anaesthesia providers in 2017 through their respective national societies. It consisted of 23 questions about the participants’ demographics and their knowledge, use, and impact of CAs. A second survey was sent to French simulation centres. Results. 912 responses were recorded in France and 278 in Canada (overall response rate: 7% and 11%, respectively). Among the respondents, 700/899 in France (78%) versus 249/273 (91%) in Canada were familiar with the concept of cognitive dysfunction during a crisis and 501/893 (56%) in France versus 250/271 (92%) in Canada knew the concept of CAs. Amongst those respondents who knew about CAs, 189/492 (38%) in France versus 108/244 (44%) in Canada stated that they had already used a CA in real life and 225/493 (45%) in France versus 126/245 (51%) in Canada had received training in their use. Simulation was the principal modality for training in 150/225 (67%) of cases in France versus 47/126 (37%) in Canada. Among the 28/50 French simulation centres which responded (2018 January), 27 organised sessions in anaesthesia and 22 used CAs. Conclusion. CAs were better known in Canada than in France, but their actual use in real life was low in both countries. Simulation appears to play a potentially important role training anaesthesia providers in the use of CAs.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1346051
spellingShingle Antonia Blanié
Matthieu Kurrek
Sophie Gorse
Dimitri Baudrier
Dan Benhamou
Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
title Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada
title_full Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada
title_fullStr Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada
title_full_unstemmed Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada
title_short Use of Cognitive Aids: Results from a National Survey among Anaesthesia Providers in France and Canada
title_sort use of cognitive aids results from a national survey among anaesthesia providers in france and canada
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1346051
work_keys_str_mv AT antoniablanie useofcognitiveaidsresultsfromanationalsurveyamonganaesthesiaprovidersinfranceandcanada
AT matthieukurrek useofcognitiveaidsresultsfromanationalsurveyamonganaesthesiaprovidersinfranceandcanada
AT sophiegorse useofcognitiveaidsresultsfromanationalsurveyamonganaesthesiaprovidersinfranceandcanada
AT dimitribaudrier useofcognitiveaidsresultsfromanationalsurveyamonganaesthesiaprovidersinfranceandcanada
AT danbenhamou useofcognitiveaidsresultsfromanationalsurveyamonganaesthesiaprovidersinfranceandcanada