Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams

Abstract Surfactant chemistry can affect the phenolic foam (PF) properties by controlling the collision and combination of the created bubbles during foam production. The study was accomplished using two surfactant families, nonionic: polysorbate (Tween80) and anionic: sodium and ammonium lauryl sul...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Hamid Shadnia, Sajad Rasouli, Mohammad Fasihi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2025-01-01
Series:Scientific Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87255-6
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832585865656795136
author Mohammad Hamid Shadnia
Sajad Rasouli
Mohammad Fasihi
author_facet Mohammad Hamid Shadnia
Sajad Rasouli
Mohammad Fasihi
author_sort Mohammad Hamid Shadnia
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Surfactant chemistry can affect the phenolic foam (PF) properties by controlling the collision and combination of the created bubbles during foam production. The study was accomplished using two surfactant families, nonionic: polysorbate (Tween80) and anionic: sodium and ammonium lauryl sulfates (SLS30 and ALS70) and sodium laureth sulfate (SLES270) to manufacture PF foams. Tween80 and SLS30 resulted in foams with the lowest and highest densities, 20.2 ± 0.2 and 42.72 ± 0.4 kg/m3, respectively. All the surfactants created an open-cell morphology, except Tween80 with a semi-open-cell structure consisting of large cells and thicker cell wall thickness. The anionic surfactant had better performance, the foams made by SLS30 had cells with diameters of 338.5 ± 18.5 and cell density of 2.5 cell/mm3 × 105. While the SLES270 made foam with the highest cell density and the smallest cell size that caused higher compressive strength. The SLES270 led to keeping the foam flexibility even under the fire exposition, and it increased the thermal insulation by 50% while the other samples were turned into fragile foam. A higher level of polarity in SLES270 caused better micelle production and then better bubble formation, followed by the bubble coalition.
format Article
id doaj-art-af7832cfef3c43819334eb26cbee24e4
institution Kabale University
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
series Scientific Reports
spelling doaj-art-af7832cfef3c43819334eb26cbee24e42025-01-26T12:25:34ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222025-01-0115111510.1038/s41598-025-87255-6Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foamsMohammad Hamid Shadnia0Sajad Rasouli1Mohammad Fasihi2School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST)Polymer Research Group, Department of Chemical, Polymeric and Petrochemical Technologies Development, Research Institute of Petroleum Industry (RIPI)School of Chemical, Petroleum and Gas Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST)Abstract Surfactant chemistry can affect the phenolic foam (PF) properties by controlling the collision and combination of the created bubbles during foam production. The study was accomplished using two surfactant families, nonionic: polysorbate (Tween80) and anionic: sodium and ammonium lauryl sulfates (SLS30 and ALS70) and sodium laureth sulfate (SLES270) to manufacture PF foams. Tween80 and SLS30 resulted in foams with the lowest and highest densities, 20.2 ± 0.2 and 42.72 ± 0.4 kg/m3, respectively. All the surfactants created an open-cell morphology, except Tween80 with a semi-open-cell structure consisting of large cells and thicker cell wall thickness. The anionic surfactant had better performance, the foams made by SLS30 had cells with diameters of 338.5 ± 18.5 and cell density of 2.5 cell/mm3 × 105. While the SLES270 made foam with the highest cell density and the smallest cell size that caused higher compressive strength. The SLES270 led to keeping the foam flexibility even under the fire exposition, and it increased the thermal insulation by 50% while the other samples were turned into fragile foam. A higher level of polarity in SLES270 caused better micelle production and then better bubble formation, followed by the bubble coalition.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87255-6Phenolic foamNonionic surfactantAnionic surfactantsThermal stabilityCompressive strengthFire resistance
spellingShingle Mohammad Hamid Shadnia
Sajad Rasouli
Mohammad Fasihi
Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
Scientific Reports
Phenolic foam
Nonionic surfactant
Anionic surfactants
Thermal stability
Compressive strength
Fire resistance
title Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
title_full Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
title_fullStr Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
title_full_unstemmed Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
title_short Influence of surfactant type on the microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
title_sort influence of surfactant type on the microstructure mechanical and thermal properties of phenolic foams
topic Phenolic foam
Nonionic surfactant
Anionic surfactants
Thermal stability
Compressive strength
Fire resistance
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87255-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadhamidshadnia influenceofsurfactanttypeonthemicrostructuremechanicalandthermalpropertiesofphenolicfoams
AT sajadrasouli influenceofsurfactanttypeonthemicrostructuremechanicalandthermalpropertiesofphenolicfoams
AT mohammadfasihi influenceofsurfactanttypeonthemicrostructuremechanicalandthermalpropertiesofphenolicfoams