Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review

Objectives Incentives have been effectively used in several healthcare contexts. This systematic review aimed to ascertain whether incentives can improve antipsychotic adherence, what ethical and practical issues arise and whether existing evidence resolves these issues.Design Systematic review of M...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nathan Hodson, Ivo Vlaev, Madiha Majid, Swaran Preet Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-01
Series:BMJ Open
Online Access:https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059526.full
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832583894764879872
author Nathan Hodson
Ivo Vlaev
Madiha Majid
Swaran Preet Singh
author_facet Nathan Hodson
Ivo Vlaev
Madiha Majid
Swaran Preet Singh
author_sort Nathan Hodson
collection DOAJ
description Objectives Incentives have been effectively used in several healthcare contexts. This systematic review aimed to ascertain whether incentives can improve antipsychotic adherence, what ethical and practical issues arise and whether existing evidence resolves these issues.Design Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Searches on 13 January 2021 (no start date) found papers on incentives for antipsychotics. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, qualitative research and ethical analyses were included. Papers measuring impact on adherence were synthesised, then a typology of ethical and policy issues was compiled, finally the empirical literature was compared with this typology to describe current evidence and identify remaining research questions.Results 26 papers were included. 2 RCTs used contingent financial incentives for long-acting injectable antipsychotic preparations. Over 12 months, there were significantly larger increases in adherence among the intervention groups versus control groups in both RCTs. There were no consistently positive secondary outcomes. 39 ethical and practical issues were identified. 12 of these are amenable to empirical study but have not been researched and for 7 the current evidence is mixed.Conclusions In keeping with other areas of healthcare, antipsychotic adherence can be increased with financial incentives. Payments of 2.5 times minimum wage changed behaviour. The typology of issues reported in this systematic review provides a template for future policy and ethical analysis. The persistence of the effect and the impact of incentives on intrinsic motivation require further research.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020222702.
format Article
id doaj-art-ae774ebb868f4539a141f66c03fa54f4
institution Kabale University
issn 2044-6055
language English
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format Article
series BMJ Open
spelling doaj-art-ae774ebb868f4539a141f66c03fa54f42025-01-28T02:55:09ZengBMJ Publishing GroupBMJ Open2044-60552022-06-0112610.1136/bmjopen-2021-059526Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic reviewNathan Hodson0Ivo Vlaev1Madiha Majid2Swaran Preet Singh3Mental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UKNIHR Policy Research Unit in Behavioural Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UKMental Health and Wellbeing, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UKMental Health and Wellbeing, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UKObjectives Incentives have been effectively used in several healthcare contexts. This systematic review aimed to ascertain whether incentives can improve antipsychotic adherence, what ethical and practical issues arise and whether existing evidence resolves these issues.Design Systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Searches on 13 January 2021 (no start date) found papers on incentives for antipsychotics. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, qualitative research and ethical analyses were included. Papers measuring impact on adherence were synthesised, then a typology of ethical and policy issues was compiled, finally the empirical literature was compared with this typology to describe current evidence and identify remaining research questions.Results 26 papers were included. 2 RCTs used contingent financial incentives for long-acting injectable antipsychotic preparations. Over 12 months, there were significantly larger increases in adherence among the intervention groups versus control groups in both RCTs. There were no consistently positive secondary outcomes. 39 ethical and practical issues were identified. 12 of these are amenable to empirical study but have not been researched and for 7 the current evidence is mixed.Conclusions In keeping with other areas of healthcare, antipsychotic adherence can be increased with financial incentives. Payments of 2.5 times minimum wage changed behaviour. The typology of issues reported in this systematic review provides a template for future policy and ethical analysis. The persistence of the effect and the impact of incentives on intrinsic motivation require further research.PROSPERO registration number CRD42020222702.https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059526.full
spellingShingle Nathan Hodson
Ivo Vlaev
Madiha Majid
Swaran Preet Singh
Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review
BMJ Open
title Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review
title_full Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review
title_fullStr Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review
title_short Can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness? A mixed-methods systematic review
title_sort can incentives improve antipsychotic adherence in major mental illness a mixed methods systematic review
url https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/6/e059526.full
work_keys_str_mv AT nathanhodson canincentivesimproveantipsychoticadherenceinmajormentalillnessamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT ivovlaev canincentivesimproveantipsychoticadherenceinmajormentalillnessamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT madihamajid canincentivesimproveantipsychoticadherenceinmajormentalillnessamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT swaranpreetsingh canincentivesimproveantipsychoticadherenceinmajormentalillnessamixedmethodssystematicreview