Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography
In this article it is shown that romantic Balticphilia (a historical, cultural concept of the authors who treat the past of the Balts, the first Paganism, as a separate, civilized, closed system, putting it in opposition to Western, Christian culture) takes root in Lithuanian historiography and doe...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Vilnius University Press
1997-12-01
|
| Series: | Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-istorijos-studijos/article/view/37429 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832593286396641280 |
|---|---|
| author | Zenonas Butkus |
| author_facet | Zenonas Butkus |
| author_sort | Zenonas Butkus |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
In this article it is shown that romantic Balticphilia (a historical, cultural concept of the authors who treat the past of the Balts, the first Paganism, as a separate, civilized, closed system, putting it in opposition to Western, Christian culture) takes root in Lithuanian historiography and doesn't induce its modernity, nor its overthrowing of historicism; it only weakly influences Latvian historiography.
Balticphilic works are clearly not plenty. They don't even make up a separate historiographical section. Latvians haven't had such a phenomenon as Daukantas who had, for a long time, traced the direction of foundational, historical thought. The very first Latvian nationalist, G. Merkelis, was not a romantic, but he supported the ideals of the Enlightenment. Many of the Latvian Renaissance men were only slightly interested in history, and they, therefore, drew their attention to the research of culture and art. The most notable XIX century Latvian historian, Janis Krodznieks, was not a romantic, but a critic.
Protestant ethics and the critical German historiographical influence encouraged the critical debates of the Latvian historians. Between the First and Second World Wars, Balticphilic idealization of the past was almost unprecedented, because Latvia didn't have international territorial problems. History, as well, didn't play such a big part in the revival of society nor such an educational role, as it did in Lithuania.
Balticphilic phenomena in Latvian historiography are, however, precedented. A number of Latvian historians, treating Livonia like a German state, idealized the Lithuanian Grand Duchy, indicating that it was not solely Lithuanian, but Latvian too; a pure state of the Balts. In 1858, J. Alunanas published a rather abstract Lithuanian historical work that covered the space of time up until the Battle of Zalgiris, and, in 1885, F. Veinberas published a joint Latvian and Lithuanian history, up until Lithuania's unionization with Poland. In these works, Lithuanian princes were extolled, while the reception of Christianity was valued as the largest misfortune.
The most distinct Balticphilic phenomenon in Latvian historiography is the demonstration that, until the German arrival at the end of the XII century and the beginning of the XIII century, Latvians didn't have a real, fully-worthy state system. Kuoknese and Jersika were real states, but they were divided, not united.
Of the most solid, most valuable Latvian historical Balticphilic texts, A. Svalis' are the most distinguished: „True Latvian History," „Latvian History" (a course manual), and „Latvian Cultural History" (two volumes).
|
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-abfd63ce58b043329423d23acad1d455 |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1392-0448 1648-9101 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 1997-12-01 |
| publisher | Vilnius University Press |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos |
| spelling | doaj-art-abfd63ce58b043329423d23acad1d4552025-01-20T18:13:45ZengVilnius University PressLietuvos Istorijos Studijos1392-04481648-91011997-12-01410.15388/LIS.1997.37429Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriographyZenonas Butkus In this article it is shown that romantic Balticphilia (a historical, cultural concept of the authors who treat the past of the Balts, the first Paganism, as a separate, civilized, closed system, putting it in opposition to Western, Christian culture) takes root in Lithuanian historiography and doesn't induce its modernity, nor its overthrowing of historicism; it only weakly influences Latvian historiography. Balticphilic works are clearly not plenty. They don't even make up a separate historiographical section. Latvians haven't had such a phenomenon as Daukantas who had, for a long time, traced the direction of foundational, historical thought. The very first Latvian nationalist, G. Merkelis, was not a romantic, but he supported the ideals of the Enlightenment. Many of the Latvian Renaissance men were only slightly interested in history, and they, therefore, drew their attention to the research of culture and art. The most notable XIX century Latvian historian, Janis Krodznieks, was not a romantic, but a critic. Protestant ethics and the critical German historiographical influence encouraged the critical debates of the Latvian historians. Between the First and Second World Wars, Balticphilic idealization of the past was almost unprecedented, because Latvia didn't have international territorial problems. History, as well, didn't play such a big part in the revival of society nor such an educational role, as it did in Lithuania. Balticphilic phenomena in Latvian historiography are, however, precedented. A number of Latvian historians, treating Livonia like a German state, idealized the Lithuanian Grand Duchy, indicating that it was not solely Lithuanian, but Latvian too; a pure state of the Balts. In 1858, J. Alunanas published a rather abstract Lithuanian historical work that covered the space of time up until the Battle of Zalgiris, and, in 1885, F. Veinberas published a joint Latvian and Lithuanian history, up until Lithuania's unionization with Poland. In these works, Lithuanian princes were extolled, while the reception of Christianity was valued as the largest misfortune. The most distinct Balticphilic phenomenon in Latvian historiography is the demonstration that, until the German arrival at the end of the XII century and the beginning of the XIII century, Latvians didn't have a real, fully-worthy state system. Kuoknese and Jersika were real states, but they were divided, not united. Of the most solid, most valuable Latvian historical Balticphilic texts, A. Svalis' are the most distinguished: „True Latvian History," „Latvian History" (a course manual), and „Latvian Cultural History" (two volumes). https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-istorijos-studijos/article/view/37429- |
| spellingShingle | Zenonas Butkus Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography Lietuvos Istorijos Studijos - |
| title | Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography |
| title_full | Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography |
| title_fullStr | Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography |
| title_full_unstemmed | Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography |
| title_short | Romantic balticphilia in Latvian istoriography |
| title_sort | romantic balticphilia in latvian istoriography |
| topic | - |
| url | https://www.journals.vu.lt/lietuvos-istorijos-studijos/article/view/37429 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zenonasbutkus romanticbalticphiliainlatvianistoriography |