Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell

Copper Indium Gallium Selenide- (CIGS-) based solar cells have become one of the most promising candidates among the thin film technologies for solar power generation. The current record efficiency of CIGS has reached 22.6% which is comparable to the crystalline silicon- (c-Si-) based solar cells. H...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kam Hoe Ong, Ramasamy Agileswari, Biancamaria Maniscalco, Panagiota Arnou, Chakrabarty Chandan Kumar, Jake W. Bowers, Marayati Bte Marsadek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018-01-01
Series:International Journal of Photoenergy
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9106269
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832562374159106048
author Kam Hoe Ong
Ramasamy Agileswari
Biancamaria Maniscalco
Panagiota Arnou
Chakrabarty Chandan Kumar
Jake W. Bowers
Marayati Bte Marsadek
author_facet Kam Hoe Ong
Ramasamy Agileswari
Biancamaria Maniscalco
Panagiota Arnou
Chakrabarty Chandan Kumar
Jake W. Bowers
Marayati Bte Marsadek
author_sort Kam Hoe Ong
collection DOAJ
description Copper Indium Gallium Selenide- (CIGS-) based solar cells have become one of the most promising candidates among the thin film technologies for solar power generation. The current record efficiency of CIGS has reached 22.6% which is comparable to the crystalline silicon- (c-Si-) based solar cells. However, material properties and efficiency on small area devices are crucial aspects to be considered before manufacturing into large scale. The process for each layer of the CIGS solar cells, including the type of substrate used and deposition condition for the molybdenum back contact, will give a direct impact to the efficiency of the fabricated device. In this paper, brief introduction on the production, efficiency, etc. of a-Si, CdTe, and CIGS thin film solar cells and c-Si solar cells are first reviewed, followed by the recent progress of substrates. Different deposition techniques’ influence on the properties of molybdenum back contact for CIGS are discussed. Then, the formation and thickness influence factors of the interfacial MoSe2 layer are reviewed; its role in forming ohmic contact, possible detrimental effects, and characterization of the barrier layers are specified. Scale-up challenges/issues of CIGS module production are also presented to give an insight into commercializing CIGS solar cells.
format Article
id doaj-art-a9756b621d0d4e7d84f822ca182ae5f7
institution Kabale University
issn 1110-662X
1687-529X
language English
publishDate 2018-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series International Journal of Photoenergy
spelling doaj-art-a9756b621d0d4e7d84f822ca182ae5f72025-02-03T01:22:47ZengWileyInternational Journal of Photoenergy1110-662X1687-529X2018-01-01201810.1155/2018/91062699106269Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar CellKam Hoe Ong0Ramasamy Agileswari1Biancamaria Maniscalco2Panagiota Arnou3Chakrabarty Chandan Kumar4Jake W. Bowers5Marayati Bte Marsadek6Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Selangor, MalaysiaDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Selangor, MalaysiaCentre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology (CREST), Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UKLaboratory for Energy Materials, University of Luxembourg, L-4422 Belvaux, LuxembourgDepartment of Electronics & Communication Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Selangor, MalaysiaCentre for Renewable Energy Systems Technology (CREST), Wolfson School of Mechanical, Electrical and Manufacturing Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire LE11 3TU, UKInstitute of Power Engineering, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Selangor, MalaysiaCopper Indium Gallium Selenide- (CIGS-) based solar cells have become one of the most promising candidates among the thin film technologies for solar power generation. The current record efficiency of CIGS has reached 22.6% which is comparable to the crystalline silicon- (c-Si-) based solar cells. However, material properties and efficiency on small area devices are crucial aspects to be considered before manufacturing into large scale. The process for each layer of the CIGS solar cells, including the type of substrate used and deposition condition for the molybdenum back contact, will give a direct impact to the efficiency of the fabricated device. In this paper, brief introduction on the production, efficiency, etc. of a-Si, CdTe, and CIGS thin film solar cells and c-Si solar cells are first reviewed, followed by the recent progress of substrates. Different deposition techniques’ influence on the properties of molybdenum back contact for CIGS are discussed. Then, the formation and thickness influence factors of the interfacial MoSe2 layer are reviewed; its role in forming ohmic contact, possible detrimental effects, and characterization of the barrier layers are specified. Scale-up challenges/issues of CIGS module production are also presented to give an insight into commercializing CIGS solar cells.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9106269
spellingShingle Kam Hoe Ong
Ramasamy Agileswari
Biancamaria Maniscalco
Panagiota Arnou
Chakrabarty Chandan Kumar
Jake W. Bowers
Marayati Bte Marsadek
Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell
International Journal of Photoenergy
title Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell
title_full Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell
title_fullStr Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell
title_full_unstemmed Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell
title_short Review on Substrate and Molybdenum Back Contact in CIGS Thin Film Solar Cell
title_sort review on substrate and molybdenum back contact in cigs thin film solar cell
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2018/9106269
work_keys_str_mv AT kamhoeong reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell
AT ramasamyagileswari reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell
AT biancamariamaniscalco reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell
AT panagiotaarnou reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell
AT chakrabartychandankumar reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell
AT jakewbowers reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell
AT marayatibtemarsadek reviewonsubstrateandmolybdenumbackcontactincigsthinfilmsolarcell