Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée
This study seeks to understand the motives and issues at stake in Lukács’s reception of Flaubert throughout his career as a philosopher and critic. In particular, we want to know whether there is a form of continuity beyond the rupture of 1917, or whether this hypothesis is completely invalid. From...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | fra |
| Published: |
Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)
2024-06-01
|
| Series: | Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/5680 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1832095841318338560 |
|---|---|
| author | François Vanoosthuyse |
| author_facet | François Vanoosthuyse |
| author_sort | François Vanoosthuyse |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This study seeks to understand the motives and issues at stake in Lukács’s reception of Flaubert throughout his career as a philosopher and critic. In particular, we want to know whether there is a form of continuity beyond the rupture of 1917, or whether this hypothesis is completely invalid. From beginning to end, Flaubert is at least at the heart of a very consistent reflection on the relationship between epic and novel. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-a877203abe664041836c4de9fa645f6f |
| institution | Kabale University |
| issn | 1969-6191 |
| language | fra |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Institut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique |
| spelling | doaj-art-a877203abe664041836c4de9fa645f6f2025-02-05T16:29:14ZfraInstitut des Textes & Manuscrits Modernes (ITEM)Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique1969-61912024-06-013110.4000/12fd8Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopéeFrançois VanoosthuyseThis study seeks to understand the motives and issues at stake in Lukács’s reception of Flaubert throughout his career as a philosopher and critic. In particular, we want to know whether there is a form of continuity beyond the rupture of 1917, or whether this hypothesis is completely invalid. From beginning to end, Flaubert is at least at the heart of a very consistent reflection on the relationship between epic and novel.https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/5680romanticismrealismLukács Georgnovelepos |
| spellingShingle | François Vanoosthuyse Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée Flaubert: Revue Critique et Génétique romanticism realism Lukács Georg novel epos |
| title | Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée |
| title_full | Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée |
| title_fullStr | Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée |
| title_full_unstemmed | Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée |
| title_short | Quand le roman s’est détourné de l’épopée |
| title_sort | quand le roman s est detourne de l epopee |
| topic | romanticism realism Lukács Georg novel epos |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/flaubert/5680 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT francoisvanoosthuyse quandleromansestdetournedelepopee |