Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. For patients with end-stage HF who are not candidates for heart transplantation, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide mechanical circulatory support as a long-term solution, known as...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emad Ali Al Khoufi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2025-01-01
Series:Life
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/53
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1832588152687034368
author Emad Ali Al Khoufi
author_facet Emad Ali Al Khoufi
author_sort Emad Ali Al Khoufi
collection DOAJ
description Background: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. For patients with end-stage HF who are not candidates for heart transplantation, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide mechanical circulatory support as a long-term solution, known as destination therapy (DT). Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize evidence on the survival rates, complications, and quality-of-life improvements associated with LVADs used as destination therapy in patients with end-stage HF. Methods: A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus, was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from 12 studies were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model. Survival rates, complications (e.g., infection and bleeding), and quality-of-life measures were the primary outcomes evaluated. Results: The analysis showed significant improvements in survival, with a pooled effect size of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.306–1.390, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Complication rates varied, with infections and bleeding being the most common adverse events. Quality of life also improved significantly post-LVAD implantation, with a standardized mean difference of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.91). Conclusions: LVADs as destination therapy provide a viable option for improving the survival and quality of life of end-stage HF patients, despite the associated risks of complications. Further research is needed to refine patient selection and management strategies to optimize outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-a7fde238e5b84cdabaec02201a2fdbbf
institution Kabale University
issn 2075-1729
language English
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Life
spelling doaj-art-a7fde238e5b84cdabaec02201a2fdbbf2025-01-24T13:38:35ZengMDPI AGLife2075-17292025-01-011515310.3390/life15010053Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-AnalysisEmad Ali Al Khoufi0Internal Medicine Department, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa 31982, Saudi ArabiaBackground: Heart failure (HF) is a chronic condition that significantly affects morbidity and mortality. For patients with end-stage HF who are not candidates for heart transplantation, left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide mechanical circulatory support as a long-term solution, known as destination therapy (DT). Objective: This meta-analysis aims to synthesize evidence on the survival rates, complications, and quality-of-life improvements associated with LVADs used as destination therapy in patients with end-stage HF. Methods: A systematic search of databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus, was conducted to identify relevant studies. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from 12 studies were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model. Survival rates, complications (e.g., infection and bleeding), and quality-of-life measures were the primary outcomes evaluated. Results: The analysis showed significant improvements in survival, with a pooled effect size of 0.848 (95% CI: 0.306–1.390, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Complication rates varied, with infections and bleeding being the most common adverse events. Quality of life also improved significantly post-LVAD implantation, with a standardized mean difference of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.91). Conclusions: LVADs as destination therapy provide a viable option for improving the survival and quality of life of end-stage HF patients, despite the associated risks of complications. Further research is needed to refine patient selection and management strategies to optimize outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/53left ventricular assist deviceheart failuredestination therapysurvival ratequality of life
spellingShingle Emad Ali Al Khoufi
Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Life
left ventricular assist device
heart failure
destination therapy
survival rate
quality of life
title Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_short Outcomes of Left Ventricular Assist Devices as Destination Therapy: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_sort outcomes of left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy a systematic review with meta analysis
topic left ventricular assist device
heart failure
destination therapy
survival rate
quality of life
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/15/1/53
work_keys_str_mv AT emadalialkhoufi outcomesofleftventricularassistdevicesasdestinationtherapyasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis